Effect of surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength between resin cement and all-ceramic core materials
Source abstract
Abstract
This study compared the influence of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength between resin cement and lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. A series of 120 lithium disilicate ceramic samples were prepared to compare the effect of different surface treatments on the shear strength of a luting cement bonded to two all-ceramic systems. IPS Empress 2 and IPS e.max Press ceramic samples were fabricated according to the manufacturer`s instructions. The ceramic samples were divided into the following 6 surface treatment groups for each ceramic system: 1—no treatment (C), 2—airborne-particle abrasion (A), 3—acid etching (E), 4—airborne-particle abrasion + acid etching (AE), 5—Nd:YAG laser (L), 6—Nd:YAG laser + acid etching (LE). Resin cement was then bonded to the treated ceramic surfaces and light polymerized. The shear bond strengths of the specimens were measured using a universal testing machine. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD ( α = 0.05) test were used to determine differences in shear bond strength between the groups. The ANOVA revealed significant differences between the treatment groups and ceramic types ( p < 0.05). The shear bond strengths of IPS Empress 2 were significantly higher than those of IPS e.max Press.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions10.1080/000163598422992 ↗
2. A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial dentures
3. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<297::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
4. Research evaluations of a lithium disilicate restorative system
5. Dental ceramics: what's new?10.12968/denu.2002.29.1.25 ↗
6. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01401.x ↗
7. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0224 ↗
8. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth10.1038/sj.bdj.4813036 ↗
9. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60028-1 ↗
10. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8 ↗
11. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report10.1067/mpr.2002.124365 ↗
12. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature10.1067/mpr.2003.50 ↗
13. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9 ↗
14. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01027.x ↗
15. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02282-0 ↗
16. Effect of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8 ↗
17. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9 ↗
18. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3 ↗
19. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement10.1016/0022-3913(94)90216-X ↗
20. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70170-2 ↗
21. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core10.1067/mpr.2000.107337 ↗
22. Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: II—the relationship of surface treatment, bond strength, interfacial toughness and fractography10.1590/S1678-77572005000200002 ↗
23. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x ↗
24. Shear bond strength of resin luting cement to glass-infiltrated porous aluminum oxide cores10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80014-1 ↗
25. Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain
26. Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives
27. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatment and agents for composite porcelain repair10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90294-2 ↗
28. Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment10.1590/S0103-64402003000200011 ↗
29. Stimulated optical radiation in ruby10.1038/187493a0 ↗
30. The history and development of laser dentistry
31. A combined carbon dioxide/erbium laser for soft and hard tissue procedures
32. Schweissen mit CO2-Lasern
33. Misrendino LJ, Pick RM, editors. Lasers in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence;. p. 231–245
34. Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.021 ↗
35. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3 ↗
36. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain10.1177/00220345870660091001 ↗
37. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027 ↗
38. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics
39. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic
40. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching10.2341/06-52 ↗
41. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.012 ↗
42. Effect of different surface treatments on In-Ceram Alumina roughness. An AFM study10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.010 ↗
43. IPS e.max lithium disilicate; The future of all-ceramic dentistry. Ivoclar-Vivadent documentation, 2009.