journal article·2011-01

Composition and polyamorphism in supercooled yttria–alumina melts

G.N. Greaves, M.C. Wilding, D. Langstaff, F. Kargl, L. Hennet, C.J. Benmore, J.K.R. Weber, Q. Vu Van, O. Majérus, P.F. McMillan

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids· Volume 357· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

By extending recent work on liquid–liquid transitions in supercooled yttria–alumina AYx liquids we draw attention to the compositional dependence of the structure factor of the high density liquid, arguing that this is sufficiently sensitive to discriminate between liquids at the level of a few %. Comparing structure factor differences between liquids of different compositions and in the same liquid AY20 between high and low temperatures straddling the transition at 1788 K between a high density liquid (HDL) and a low density liquid (LDL) enables compositional phase separation to be ruled out. It points instead to kinetic changes in polyhedral configurational order being the drivers for this polyamorphic transformation. Rotor behaviour observed in levitated liquid drops used in the high temperature experiments enables the reversibility of the LLT transition (LLT) and the associated changes in entropy and density to be identified. Evidence for critical-like behaviour in the structural relaxation time and in the fluctuation correlation length is presented. By re-examining recent work which failed to find the structural and thermal signatures for the LLT in liquid AY20 at 1788 K we present evidence for the LLT occurring instead in liquid AY15 at 1940 K, suggesting that the liquid-liquid transition temperature in AYx liquids decreases with increasing yttria content.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications · Phase Change Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Zarzycki · 1991
2. Greaves · Adv. Phys. · 2007 · 56 · 110.1080/00018730601147426 ↗
3. McMillan · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 41510110.1088/0953-8984/19/41/415101 ↗
4. Angell · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A · 2004 · 363 · 41510.1098/rsta.2004.1500 ↗
5. Kurita · Science · 2004 · 306 · 84510.1126/science.1103073 ↗
6. Jakse · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 32710310.1063/1.3154368 ↗
7. Stanley · 1971
8. Debenedetti · 1997
9. Poole · Nature · 1992 · 360 · 32410.1038/360324a0 ↗
10. Poole · Science · 1997 · 275 · 32210.1126/science.275.5298.322 ↗
11. Sastry · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 73910.1038/nmat994 ↗
12. Jakse · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 20570210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.205702 ↗
13. Tanaka · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 02570110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.025701 ↗
14. Kurita · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 20450510.1063/1.2735625 ↗
15. Katayama · Nature · 2000 · 403 · 17010.1038/35003143 ↗
16. Katayama · Science · 2004 · 306 · 84810.1126/science.1102735 ↗
17. Wilson · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 5420610.1103/PhysRevB.69.054206 ↗
18. Aasland · Nature · 1994 · 369 · 63310.1038/369633a0 ↗
19. Wilding · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2001 · 293-295 · 35710.1016/S0022-3093(01)00686-X ↗
20. Wilding · J. Phys. Chem. Glasses · 2002 · 43 · 306
21. Ansell · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 46410.1103/PhysRevLett.78.464 ↗
22. Hennet · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 05390310.1063/1.2200756 ↗
23. Landron · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2000 · 71 · 174510.1063/1.1150531 ↗
24. Greaves · Science · 2008 · 322 · 56610.1126/science.1160766 ↗
25. Greaves · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 71510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.030 ↗
26. Landron · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 483910.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4839 ↗
27. Barnes · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 22570210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.225702 ↗
28. Bras · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2003 · 36 · 79110.1107/S002188980300400X ↗
29. Hennet · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 164310.1351/pac200779101643 ↗
30. Weber · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2000 · 83 · 186810.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01483.x ↗
31. Skinner · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 20510310.1088/0953-8984/20/20/205103 ↗
32. Fischer · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2006 · 69 · 23310.1088/0034-4885/69/1/R05 ↗
33. Du · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 20510210.1088/0953-8984/21/20/205102 ↗
34. V. Cristiglio, PhD Thesis, Université d'Orléans (2008).
35. L. Hennet, private communication.
36. Q. Vu Van, PhD thesis, Aberystwyth University (2008).
37. Richet · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1984 · 48 · 47110.1016/0016-7037(84)90275-8 ↗
38. In attempting to model the LLT in AY20 using our value for ΔHLL from Ref. [24], Barnes et al. [27] used integer stoichiometries rather than Al2O3 equivalent which created confusingly small (×1/5) values and incorrect exotherms.
39. Lin · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1999 · 243 · 27310.1016/S0022-3093(98)00814-X ↗
40. Paradis · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 43 · 439610.1143/JJAP.43.1496 ↗
41. Als-Nielsen · Phase Transitions Crit. Phenom. · 1976 · 5a · 87
42. L.B. Skinner, PhD Thesis, Bristol University (2009).
43. Although Barnes et al. do not make this clear, their Q1, values plotted in Fig. 2 in Ref. [27] were obtained from I(Q) not from S(Q) in contrast to our data that they have included from Ref [24]. This is the origin of the difference of 0.14Å−1 between the two sets of data [A.C. Barnes — private communication]. In compiling Fig. 3(b) in the present paper we have clarified this distinction. We have also corrected the apparent temperatures Ta in [27] to true temperatures [29] in Fig. 2(a), Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b), so that direct comparisons can be made between the results in Ref. [27] and in Ref. [24].