Residual entropy and structural disorder in glass: A review of history and an attempt to resolve two apparently conflicting views
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract With the aim of discussing recent conflicting views of configurational entropy in frozen-in systems, we begin this paper with a brief review of the history of the entropy concept. Whereas the ‘conventional’ view of entropy had been elaborated after long and heated debates, a recently proposed ‘kinetic’ view has denied the existence of residual entropy in amorphous systems. We thus examine the validity of the ‘conventional’ view and then propose a more complete picture of the glassy state from the complementary roles of two conflicting views. Above all, we analyze the consistency of the ‘spatial sampling’ method and the difference from the other two methods by using three simple models and thought experiments. Our first conclusion is that, as defined for non-equilibrium systems within the framework of thermodynamics, entropy remains an objective state variable for which an observation time needs not to be specified. The second is that, owing to its extensive nature, entropy is in fact strongly linked to the distribution in configuration and momentum space rather than to temporal integration. As an obvious consequence, the degree of structural disorder remains an essential issue in glass thermodynamics. The third is that the new concepts of magnitude and phase factor of entropy indicate that the ‘conventional’ view, according to which configurational entropy does not vanish in irreversibly frozen-in systems, is not only consistent with thermodynamic theory and available data, but also accounts for kinetic effects such as fluctuation phenomena. With the concept of phase factor of entropy, the number of phase factors visited during the observation time in the ‘conventional’ view turns to be almost equivalent to the entropy value defined by the ‘kinetic’ view. Finally, non-zero values of residual entropies measured by calorimetry based on the ‘conventional’ view are real and useful features that have a fundamental bearing on the physics and chemistry of real crystals and glasses. The ‘kinetic’ view is also a useful tool as well to understand the kinetic effects, such the rapid slowdown from liquids to glass and the glass transition. It is strongly hoped that a complete picture of the glassy state will be advanced further.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zachariasen · J. Chem. Soc. · 1932 · 54 · 384110.1021/ja01349a006 ↗
2. Greaves · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1985 · 71 · 20310.1016/0022-3093(85)90289-3 ↗
3. Elliott · 1990
4. Wright · Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. B · 2010 · 233
5. Zarzycki · 1982
6. Varshneya · 1994
7. Simon · Physica · 1937 · 4 · 108910.1016/S0031-8914(37)80205-0 ↗
8. Struik · 1978
9. Takada · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2013 · 360 · 1310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.10.002 ↗
10. Takada · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2013 · 365 · 5310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.01.027 ↗
11. Clausius · Ann. Phys. · 1865 · 125 · 426
12. Prigogine · 1998
13. 2002
14. Brush · 1976
15. Boltzmann · 1896
16. Encyclopedia of Physics (ed. by S. Flügge), Springer, Berlin (1959).
17. Bolzmann · Wien. Ber. · 1877 · 76 · 373
18. Tolman · 1979
19. Brush · 1976
20. Uffink · 2004
21. Sklar · 2009
22. Gibbs · 1960
23. Jaynes · Am. J. Phys. · 1965 · 33 · 39110.1119/1.1971557 ↗
24. Prigogine · 1980
25. Hill · 1956
26. Shannon · 1948
27. Jaynes · Phys. Rev. · 1957 · 106 · 62010.1103/PhysRev.106.620 ↗
28. Sethna · 2006
29. Penrose · 1970
30. Prigogine · 1984
31. Gutzow · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 58110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.026 ↗
32. Nemilov · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 60710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.11.022 ↗
33. Wilks · 1963
34. Nernst · 1969
35. Planck · 1945
36. Simon · 1956 · 1
37. Atkins · 1998
38. Moore · 1983
39. Castellan · 1983
40. Widom · 2002
41. McQuarrie · 2000
42. Sommerfeld · 1956
43. Gurney · 1949
44. Rushbrooke · 1951
45. Landau · 1964
46. Lewis · 1961
47. Fowler · 1949
48. Goldstein · 1993
49. Dugdale · 1996
50. Richet · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 62810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.027 ↗
51. Simon · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 1931 · 203 · 21910.1002/zaac.19312030120 ↗
52. Richet · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 1984 · 48 · 47110.1016/0016-7037(84)90275-8 ↗
53. Fotheringham · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 64210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.01.028 ↗
54. Richet · Rev. Geophys. · 1986 · 24 · 110.1029/RG024i001p00001 ↗
55. Richet · 1995 · vol. 32 · 67
56. Conradt · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 63610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.12.013 ↗
57. Flory · J. Chem. Phys. · 1942 · 10 · 5110.1063/1.1723621 ↗
58. Huggins · J. Phys. Chem. · 1942 · 46 · 15110.1021/j150415a018 ↗
59. Bragg · Proc. R. Soc. · 1934 · A145 · 699
60. Guggenheim · 1952
61. Shakhmatkin · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1994 · 177 · 24910.1016/0022-3093(94)90538-X ↗
62. Conradt · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 345&346 · 1610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.038 ↗
63. Haida · J. Chem. Thermodyn. · 1977 · 9 · 113310.1016/0021-9614(77)90115-X ↗
64. Johari · Thermochim. Acta · 2011 · 522 · 17310.1016/j.tca.2011.02.017 ↗
65. Gutzow · 1995
66. Langer · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 41 · 226110.1103/PhysRevB.41.2261 ↗
67. de Groot · 1984
68. Gujrati · Phys. Rev. E · 2010 · 81 · 0513010.1103/PhysRevE.81.051130 ↗
69. Mauro · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 18451110.1063/1.2731774 ↗
70. Gupta · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 22450410.1063/1.2738471 ↗
71. Kivelson · J. Chem. Phys. B · 1999 · 103 · 833710.1021/jp990960b ↗
72. Kac · 1957
73. Onsager · Phys. Rev. · 1931 · 37 · 40510.1103/PhysRev.37.405 ↗
74. J-P. Bouchaud and G. Birori, J. Chem. Phys. 121 (2004) 7347.10.1063/1.1796231 ↗
75. Sipp · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2002 · 298 · 20210.1016/S0022-3093(02)00948-1 ↗
76. Kittel · 1958
77. Terletskii · 1971
78. Gujrati · Symmetry · 2010 · 2 · 120110.3390/sym2031201 ↗
79. Hill · 1963
80. Gupta · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 129 · 06710110.1063/1.2965901 ↗
81. P.D. Gujrati, Is structural relaxation during vitrification the inverse of the glass transition? (Report number: UATP/1102) http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.0219v1/.
82. Takada · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2014 · 400 · 7210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.02.003 ↗
83. Mauro · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 60010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.09.044 ↗
84. Mauro · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 16450310.1063/1.3499326 ↗
85. Goldstein · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 134 · 12450210.1063/1.3570615 ↗
86. Tropin · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2011 · 357 · 129110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.11.111 ↗
87. Tropin · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2011 · 357 · 130310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.005 ↗
88. R. Conradt, P. Richet, A. Takada, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, submitted.
89. P. Richet, R.A. Robie, J. Rogez, B.S. Hemingway, P. Courtial, C. Téqui, Phys. Chem. Minerals 17 (1990) 385. (2001) 024206/1.10.1007/BF00212206 ↗
90. Lee · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 270 · 26010.1016/S0022-3093(00)00089-2 ↗
91. Goldstein · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2011 · 357 · 46310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.089 ↗
92. Johari · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 12450910.1063/1.3364999 ↗
93. Jordanov · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2012 · 123910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.02.031 ↗
94. Garden · Thermochim. Acta · 2007 · 452 · 8510.1016/j.tca.2006.08.017 ↗
95. Garden · Thermochim. Acta · 2007 · 461 · 5710.1016/j.tca.2007.05.022 ↗
96. Clausius · Ann. Phys. · 1857 · 100 · 35310.1002/andp.18571760302 ↗
97. Maxwell · 1883
98. Schrödinger · 1958
99. Gupta · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2009 · 355 · 59510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.11.021 ↗
100. Bohm · 1957