Indentation response of glass with temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical response of different glasses to a Vickers indentor has been investigated between room temperature and Tg þ 50 C. The permanent deformation, from which hardness is estimated, as well as the brittle fracture characteristics, allowing for an evaluation of the fracture toughness, were measured and analysed. Comparison between a standard float glass and advanced glasses such as chalcogenide (with mainly covalent bonding) and metallic glasses was made to get a more general insight into high temperature indentation behaviour. As temperature increases, the glass response becomes more and more time-dependent, and in the vicinity of Tg the permanent deformation was observed to increase rapidly for all glasses. Further, while the standard float glass showed an enhanced apparent toughness at elevated temperatures due to a brittle to ductile transition, almost no change in apparent toughness was revealed in the GeAsSe glass emphasizing the time-dependent response of glass at elevated temperature. 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Glass properties and applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Lawn, Fracture of Brittle Solids, in: Cambridge Solid State Science Series, Cambridge, 199310.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
2. Cook · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1990 · 73 · 78710.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05119.x ↗
3. Wiederhorn · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 1980 · 38&39 · 43310.1016/0022-3093(80)90457-3 ↗
4. Westbrook · Phys. Chem. Glasses · 1960 · 1 · 32
5. Watanabe · J. Mater. Sci. · 2001 · 36 · 242710.1023/A:1017973830342 ↗
6. Smith · Surf. Eng. · 2000 · 16 · 14310.1179/026708400101517044 ↗
7. Peter · Glasstech. Ber. · 1964 · 37 · 333
8. Le Bourhis · Verre · 1998 · 5 · 6
9. Le Bourhis · Scripta Mater. · 2001 · 45 · 31710.1016/S1359-6462(01)01034-X ↗
10. M.-L. Vaillant, V. Keryvin, T. Rouxel, Y. Kawamura, Scripta Mater., in press
11. Inoue · Mater. Trans. · 1996 · 37 · 133710.2320/matertrans1989.37.1337 ↗
12. Chaudhri · J. Phys. D · 1988 · 21 · 37010.1088/0022-3727/21/2/021 ↗
13. Yoshida · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2001 · 84 · 214110.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00976.x ↗
14. Kurkjian · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1995 · 78 · 73710.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08241.x ↗
15. Watanabe · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2001 · 286 · 14110.1016/S0022-3093(01)00521-X ↗
16. Argon · Acta. Metall. · 1979 · 27 · 4710.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 ↗
17. Anstis · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1981 · 64 · 53310.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
18. Sehgal · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1995 · 14 · 16710.1007/BF00318244 ↗
19. Rouxel · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2000 · 271 · 22410.1016/S0022-3093(00)00109-5 ↗
20. Wiederhorn · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1969 · 52 · 9910.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb13350.x ↗
21. Guin · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2002 · 298 · 26010.1016/S0022-3093(01)01053-5 ↗