Evaluation of the seawater desalination performance of the MXene composite membranes using thermo-responsive polymeric draw solution-driven forward osmosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Hantanasirisakul K, Gogotsi Y (2018) Electronic and optical properties of 2D transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes). Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180477910.1002/adma.201804779 ↗
2. Ding L, Wei Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Caro J, Wang H (2017) A two-dimensional lamellar membrane: MXene nanosheet stacks. Angew Chem 129(7):1851–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20160930610.1002/anie.201609306 ↗
3. Hojjati-Najafabadi A, Mansoorianfar M, Liang T, Shahin K, Wen Y, Bahrami A, Karaman C, Zare N, Karimi-Maleh H, Vasseghian Y (2022) Magnetic-MXene-based nanocomposites for water and wastewater treatment: a review. J Water Process Eng 47:102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.10269610.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102696 ↗
4. Wang X, Li Q, Zhang J, Huang H, Wu S, Yang Y (2020) Novel thin-film reverse osmosis membrane with Mxene Ti3C2Tx embedded in polyamide to enhance the water flux, anti-fouling and chlorine resistance for water desalination. J Membr Sci 603:118036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11803610.1016/j.memsci.2020.118036 ↗
5. Xue Q, Meng W, Zhu J, Fang Q, Zhang K (2023) Constructing carboxylated MXene interlayer in polyamide nanofiltration membrane for enhancing perm-selectivity and antifouling performance. J Membr Sci 683:121860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12186010.1016/j.memsci.2023.121860 ↗
6. Vahid Vatanpour V, Mahdiei S, Arefi-Oskoui S, Khataee A, Orooji Y (2023) Ti2NTx quasi-Mxene modified polyamide thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane with effective desalination and antifouling performance. Chemosphere 344:140309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.14030910.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140309 ↗
7. Singh SK, Pandey A, Maiti A (2024) Optimized preparation route for polyamide top-coated forward osmosis membrane for enhanced water flux using industrial wastewater as feed. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31:39454–39480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33742-810.1007/s11356-024-33742-8 ↗
8. Singh SK, Sharma C, Mahadeva R, Patole SP, Maiti A (2024) Predicting forward osmosis performance with synthesized polyamide-based membrane: an integrated machine learning (MATLAB and ANN) and economic analysis framework. J Clean Prod 444:141285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14128510.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141285 ↗
9. Singh SK, Sharma C (2023) Maiti, modeling and experimental validation of forward osmosis process: parameters selection, permeate flux prediction, and process optimization. J Membr Sci 672:121439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12143910.1016/j.memsci.2023.121439 ↗
10. Rai M, Pandey A, Singh SK, Maiti A (2024) Thermo-responsive polymer to clean fouled forward osmosis membrane after wastewater treatment: excellent flux recovery. Polym Eng Sci 64:2541–2553. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2670810.1002/pen.26708 ↗
11. Nie Y, Xie C, Wang Y (2022) Preparation and characterization of the forward osmosis membrane modified by MXene nano-sheets. Membranes 12:146. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1202014610.3390/membranes12020146 ↗
12. Alfahel R, Azzam RS, Hafiz M, Hawari AH, Pandey RP, Mahmoud KA, Hassan MK, Elzatahry AA (2020) Fabrication of fouling resistant Ti3C2Tx (MXene)/cellulose acetate nanocomposite membrane for forward osmosis application. J Water Process Eng 38:101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10155110.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101551 ↗
13. Wu X, Ding M, Xu H, Yang W, Zhang K, Tian H, Wang H, Xie Z (2020) Scalable Ti3C2Tx MXene interlayered forward osmosis membranes for enhanced water purification and organic solvent recovery. ACS Nano 14:9125–9135. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c0447110.1021/acsnano.0c04471 ↗
14. Sun P, Sarkar P, Yun E-T, Lee JH, Tang CY, Park HD (2023) Multi-layer structure toward simultaneous enhancement of forward osmosis membrane separation performance and anti-biofouling property. J Membr Sci 683:121804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12180410.1016/j.memsci.2023.121804 ↗
15. Jiang Y (2025) Applications and perspectives of Ti3C2Tx Mxene in electrochemical energy storage systems. Int J Electrochem Sci 20:100948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoes.2025.10094810.1016/j.ijoes.2025.100948 ↗
16. Fan Y, Wei L, Meng X, Zhang W, Yang N, Jin Y, Wang X, Zhao M, Liu S (2019) An unprecedented high-temperature-tolerance 2D laminar MXene membrane for ultrafast hydrogen sieving. J Membr Sci 569:117–12310.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.017 ↗
17. Wang Y, Nie Y, Chen C, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Jia Y, Li J, Li Z (2022) Preparation and characterization of a thin-film composite membrane modified by MXene nano-sheets. Membranes 12:368. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1204036810.3390/membranes12040368 ↗
18. Cheng J, Gier M, R-Rodriguez LU, Prasad V, Elliott JAW, Sputtek A (2013) Osmotic virial coefficients of hydroxyethyl starch from aqueous hydroxyethyl starch sodium chloride vapor pressure osmometry. J Phys Chem B 117:10231–10240. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp403377b10.1021/jp403377b ↗
19. Ahmed M, Kumar R, Garudachari B, Thomas JP (2019) Performance evaluation of a thermo-responsive polyelectrolyte draw solution in a pilot scale forward osmosis seawater desalination system. Desalination 452:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.11.01310.1016/j.desal.2018.11.013 ↗
20. Wang S, Liu Y, Liu Y, Shi Z, Zhou J, Zhu J, Hu W (2022) Identifying the surface properties of Ti3C2Tx Mxene through transmission electron microscopy. Cell Reports Physical Science 3:101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10115110.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101151 ↗
21. Zhou D, Gopinath SCB, Mohamed Saheed MS, Siva Sangu S, Lakshmipriya T (2020) MXene surface on multiple junction triangles for determining osteosarcoma cancer biomarker by dielectrode microgap sensor. Int J Nanomedicine 14:10171–10181. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S28475210.2147/IJN.S284752 ↗
22. Song X, Zhang Y, Abdel-Ghafar HM, Abdel-Aal E-SA, Huang M, Gul S, Jiang H (2021) Polyamide membrane with an ultrathin GO interlayer on macroporous substrate for minimizing internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis. Chem Eng J 412:128607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12860710.1016/j.cej.2021.128607 ↗
23. Emadzadeh D, Lau W, Rahbari-Sisakht M, Ilbeygi H, Rana D, Matsuura T, Ismail A (2015) Synthesis, modification and optimization of titanate nanotubes-polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane for forward osmosis (FO) application. Chem Eng J 281:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.03510.1016/j.cej.2015.06.035 ↗
24. Park MJ, Phuntsho S, He T, Nisola GM, Tijing L, Li X-M, Chen G, Chung W-J, Shon HK (2015) Graphene oxide incorporated polysulfone substrate for the fabrication of flat-sheet thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 493:496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.05310.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.053 ↗
25. Liu Q, Xu G-R (2016) Graphene oxide (GO) as functional material in tailoring polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Desalination 394:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.05.01710.1016/j.desal.2016.05.017 ↗
26. Ren X, Wang L, Fu H, Wang Y, Hu D, Feng X (2023) Interfacial polymerization process based on diffusion control: role of chemical composition and morphology on fouling resistance. J Environ Chem Eng 11:110511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.11051110.1016/j.jece.2023.110511 ↗
27. Almansouri HE, Edokali M, Seman MNA (2024) Flat sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes for water treatment and purification: a review on modification techniques and concepts. Desalin Water Treat 320:100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.10081510.1016/j.dwt.2024.100815 ↗
28. Azam RS, Almasri DA, Alfahel R, Hawari AH, Hassan MK, Elzatahry AA, Mahmoud KA (2022) MXene (Ti3C2Tx)/cellulose acetate mixed-matrix membrane enhances fouling resistance and rejection in the crossflow filtration process. Membranes 12:406. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1204040610.3390/membranes12040406 ↗
29. Pandey L, Liang W, Mohammadi AV, Zhang T, Gogotsid Y, Wanunu M (2024) Hydrophilicity and surface charge modulation of Ti3C2Tx Mxene based membranes for water desalination. RSC Adv 14:21635–21643. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA02678K10.1039/D4RA02678K ↗
30. Farahbakhsh J, Golgoli M, Khiadani M, Najafi M, Suwaileh W, Razmjou A, Zargar M (2024) Recent advances in surface tailoring of thin film forward osmosis membranes: a review. Chemosphere 346:140493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.14049310.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140493 ↗
31. Wang J, Wang Z, Liang J, He Z (2021) Electrolysis-assisted recovery of reverse-fluxed solutes in forward osmosis. Desalination 520:115346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.11534610.1016/j.desal.2021.115346 ↗
32. Usman J, Yogarathinam LT, Baig N, Abba SI, Chrystie R, Aljundi IH (2024) Mxene-enhanced sulfonated TFN nanofiltration membranes for improved desalination performance. Desalination 581:117566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.11756610.1016/j.desal.2024.117566 ↗
33. Nie Y, Xie C, Wang Y (2022) Preparation and characterization of the forward osmosis membrane modified by MXene nano-sheets. Membranes. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1202014610.3390/membranes12020146 ↗
34. Lei Y, Zhu L, Xu J, Liu S, Zeng Z, Li X, Wang G (2023) The metal organic framework of Uio-66-NH2 reinforced nanofiltration membrane for highly efficient ion sieving. J Environ Chem Eng 11:111222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.11122210.1016/j.jece.2023.111222 ↗
35. Zhao YY, Liu YL, Wang XM, Huang X, Xie YF (2019) Impacts of metal-organic frameworks on structure and performance of polyamide thin-film nanocomposite membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:13724–13734. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b0192310.1021/acsami.9b01923 ↗
36. Ahmed M (2024) A study on the influence of feed and draw solution concentrations on the performance of the pilot-scale forward osmosis-membrane distillation system. Desalin Water Treat 317:100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.10022510.1016/j.dwt.2024.100225 ↗
37. Carmignani G, Sitkiewitz S, Webley J (2012) Recovery of 448 retrograde soluble solute for forward osmosis water treatment. U S Patent 20120267308:A1
38. Thorat NM, Lele AK, Kharul UK (2024) ABPBI-based hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis (FO) possessing low reverse salt flux. Desalin Water Treat 320:100641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.10064110.1016/j.dwt.2024.100641 ↗
39. Ihsanullah I, Bilal M (2022) Potential of MXene-based membranes in water treatment and desalination: a critical review. Chemosphere 303:135234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13523410.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135234 ↗