journal article·2025-06

Role of the exchange and correlation interactions on the electronic and magnetic properties of small iron-oxide clusters

J. E. Rivera-Pérez, S. A. Saucedo-Anaya, P. Ruiz-Díaz

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 27· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract By utilizing the Becke 3-parameter Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) hybrid ex-change-correlation(XC) functional, which combines both local and non-local exchange-correlation terms, we conduct first-principles calculations to investigate the electronic, magnetic, and structural properties of small iron-oxide clusters (with N ≤ 8). Additionally, we employ the semi-local Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) XC-functional along with the PBE+U approximation, which accounts for on-site intra-atomic Coulomb repulsion interactions. We compare the results with those obtained using the non-local functional. Our findings show that the choice of the XC-functional strongly influences the physical properties of the iron-oxide clusters. The clusters adopt planar structures with Fe-O-Fe bonding angles close to 90◦ degrees, facilitating the emergence of indirect or super-exchange interaction mechanisms between the Fe-atoms mediated by the connecting oxygen atoms. Overall, the stabilization of the magnetic ordering is driven by the competition between direct and indi-rect exchange interactions, with the latter favoring antiferromagnetism. A Local Density of States (LDOS) together with a Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population(COHP) analysis allows us to identify the symmetries of the participating d-orbitals on these interaction mechanisms from a local perspective, which control the magnetic properties of the iron-oxide clusters. Besides, our results highlight the importance of using XC-functionals that more accurately account for exchange and electronic correlation interactions rather than relying solely on standard semi-local functionals.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Xiao Z, Zhang Q, Guo X, Villanova J, Hu Y, Külaots I, Garcia-Rojas D, Guo W, Colvin VL (2020) Libraries of uniform magnetic multicore nanoparticles with tunable dimensions for biomedical and photonic applications. ACS Appl Mater Interf 12:41932–41941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0977810.1021/acsami.0c09778 ↗
2. Cheng Z, Fu Q, Duan H, Xue Y, Zhang W (2019) Size-dependent thermodynamics of structural transition and magnetic properties of Nano-Fe$$_2$$O$$_3$$3. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:8418–8425. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0059910.1021/acs.iecr.9b00599 ↗
3. Jiang C, Garg S, Waite TD (2017) Iron redox transformations in the presence of natural organic matter: effect of calcium. Environ Sci Technol 51:10413–10422. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b0194410.1021/acs.est.7b01944 ↗
4. Tsou CC, Chiu WC, Ke C, Tsai JC, Wang Y, Chiang M, Liaw W (2014) Iron(III) bound by hydrosulfide anion ligands: no-promoted stabilization of the [Fe$$^III$$-SH] motif. J Am Chem Soc 136:9424–9433. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja503683y10.1021/ja503683y ↗
5. Logemann R, De Wijs GA, Katsnelson MI, Kirilyuk A (2015) Geometric, electronic, and magnetic structure of Fe$$_x$$O$$_y^+$$ clusters. Phys Rev B 92(14):144427. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.14442710.1103/PhysRevB.92.144427 ↗
6. Xu B-F, Yang C-L, Wang M-S, Ma X-G (2011) The geometric structure and electronic properties of Fe$$_3$$O$$_3^+$$ clusters. Phys B 406(2):200–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2010.10.04210.1016/j.physb.2010.10.042 ↗
7. Montiel Schneider MG, Martín MJ, Otarola J, Vakarelska E, Simeonov V, Lassalle V, Nedyalkova M (2002) Biomedical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles: current insights progress and perspectives. Pharmaceutics 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1401020410.3390/pharmaceutics14010204 ↗
8. Singamaneni S, Bliznyuk VN, Binek C, Tsymbal EY (2011) Magnetic nanoparticles: recent advances in synthesis, self-assembly and applications. J Mater Chem 21:16819–16845. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM11845E10.1039/C1JM11845E ↗
9. Akbarzadeh A, Samiei M, Davaran S (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, physical properties, and applications in biomedicine. Nanoscale Res Lett 1(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-14410.1186/1556-276X-7-144 ↗
10. Ali A, Shah T, Ullah R, Zhou P, Guo M, Ovais M, Tan Z, Rui Y (2021) Review on recent progress in magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and diverse applications. Front Chem 9:629054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.62905410.3389/fchem.2021.629054 ↗
11. Xie W, Guo Z, Gao F, Gao Q, Wang D, Liaw B-S, Cai Q, Sun X, Wang X, Zhao L (2018) Shape-, size- and structure-controlled synthesis and biocompatibility of iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic theranostics. Theranostics 8:3284–3307. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.2522010.7150/thno.25220 ↗
12. Valdiglesias V, Fernández-Bertólez N, Kiliç G, Costa C, Costa S, Fraga S, Bessa MJ, Pásaro E, Teixeira JP, Laffon B (2016) Are iron oxide nanoparticles safe? current knowledge and future perspectives. J Trace Elem Med Biol 38:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.03.017. ISTERH congress10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.03.017 ↗
13. Florence Gazeau ML, Wilhelm C (2008) Optimizing magnetic nanoparticle design for nanothermotherapy. Nanomedicine 3(6):831–844. https://doi.org/10.2217/17435889.3.6.83110.2217/17435889.3.6.831 ↗
14. Xie J, Huang J, Li X, Sun S, Chen X (2009) Iron oxide nanoparticle platform for biomedical applications. Curr Med Chem 16(10):1278–1294. https://doi.org/10.2174/09298670978784660410.2174/092986709787846604 ↗
15. Sakellari D, Brintakis K, Kostopoulou A, Myrovali E, Simeonidis K, Lappas A, Angelakeris M (2016) Ferrimagnetic nanocrystal assemblies as versatile magnetic particle hyperthermia mediators. Mater Sci Eng C 58:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.02310.1016/j.msec.2015.08.023 ↗
16. Reimer P, Balzer T (2003) Ferucarbotran (resovist): a new clinically approved res-specific contrast agent for contrast-enhanced mri of the liver: properties, clinical development, and applications. Eur Radiol 13(6):1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1721-710.1007/s00330-002-1721-7 ↗
17. Krishnan KM (2010) Biomedical nanomagnetics: a spin through possibilities in imaging, diagnostics, and therapy. IEEE transactions on magnetics. 46(7):2523–2558. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.204690710.1109/TMAG.2010.2046907 ↗
18. Bao G, Mitragotri S, Tong S (2013) Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery and molecular imaging. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 15:253–282. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-15240910.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152409 ↗
19. Cao J, Wang Y, Yu J, Xia J, Zhang C, Yin D, Häfeli UO (2004) Preparation and radiolabeling of surface-modified magnetic nanoparticles with rhenium-188 for magnetic targeted radiotherapy. J Magn Magn Mater 277(1):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.10.02210.1016/j.jmmm.2003.10.022 ↗
20. Maggioni D, Arosio P, Orsini F, Ferretti AM, Orlando T, Manfredi A, Ranucci E, Ferruti P, D’Alfonso G, Lascialfari A (2014) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles stabilized by a poly(amidoamine)-rhenium complex as potential theranostic probe. Dalton Trans 43:1172–1183. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3DT52377B10.1039/C3DT52377B ↗
21. Thompson MC, Dodson LG, Weber JM (2017) Structural Motifs of [Fe(CO$$_{2 )n }$$]$$-$$ Clusters (n = 3–7). J Phys Chem A 121(21):4132–4138. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b0274210.1021/acs.jpca.7b02742 ↗
22. Konarev DV, Kuzmin AV, Ishikawa M, Nakano Y, Faraonov MA, Khasanov SS, Otsuka A, Yamochi H, Saito G, Lyubovskaya RN (2014) Layered salts with iron hexadecachlorophthalocyanine anions - the formation of [$$\{\text{ FeCl}16\text{ Pc }\}2]3-$$ dimers containing [Fe$$^I$$cl$$16$$Pc($$2-$$)]$$^-$$ and diamagnetic [Fe$$^0$$cl$$16$$Pc(2-)]$$2-$$. Eur J Inorg Chem 2014:3863–3870. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.20140012610.1002/ejic.201400126 ↗
23. Navarro AM, Torres CR, Bilovol V, Cabrera A, Errico LA, Weissmann M (2014) Study of the relation between oxygen vacancies and ferromagnetism in Fe-doped TiO$$_2$$ nano-powders. J Appl Phys 115:223908. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.488318310.1063/1.4883183 ↗
24. Aguilera-del-Toro RH, Aguilera-Granja F, Torres MB, Vega A (2021) Relation between structural patterns and magnetism in small iron oxide clusters: reentrance of the magnetic moment at high oxidation ratios. Phys Chem Chem Phys 23:246–272. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP03795H10.1039/D0CP03795H ↗
25. Perco D, Loi F, Bignardi L, Sbuelz L, Lacovig P, Tosi E, Lizzit S, Kartouzian A, Baraldi A (2023) The highest oxidation state observed in graphene-supported sub-nanometer iron oxide clusters. Commun Chem 6:61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00865-x10.1038/s42004-023-00865-x ↗
26. Yang Q, Fu X, Jia C, Wang X, Zeng J, Si R, Zhang Y, Yan C (2016) Structural determination of catalytically active subnanometer iron oxide clusters. ACS Catal 6:3072–3082. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b0032810.1021/acscatal.6b00328 ↗
27. Wang H, Li K, Yao Y, Wang Q, Cheng Y, Schwingenschlögl U, Zhang XX, Yang W (2012) Unraveling the atomic structure of ultrafine iron clusters. Sci Rep 2:995. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0099510.1038/srep00995 ↗
28. Paxton AT, Elsässer C (2013) Analysis of a carbon dimer bound to a vacancy in iron using density functional theory and a tight binding model. Phys Rev B 87(22):224110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.22411010.1103/PhysRevB.87.224110 ↗
29. Kapoor A, Singh N, Dey AB, Nigam AK, Bajpai A (2018) 3d transition metals and oxides within carbon nanotubes by co-pyrolysis of metallocene & camphor: high filling efficiency and self-organized structures. Carbon 132:733–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.09210.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.092 ↗
30. Ortiz-Morales M, Soto-Bernal J, Frausto-Reyes C, Acosta-Ortiz S, González-Mota R, Rosales-Candelas I (2018) Multiwavelength raman spectroscopic analysis of superficial iron-chromium oxides generated using laser irradiation. Appl Spectrosc 72:879–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/000370281875832510.1177/0003702818758325 ↗
31. Tolba SA, Gameel KM, Ali BA, Almossalami HA, Allam NK (2018) The DFT+U: approaches, accuracy, and applications. In: Density functional calculations - recent progresses of theory and application. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72020 . https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/5899910.5772/intechopen.72020 ↗
32. Gutsev GL, Bauschlicher CW (2003) Electron affinities, ionization energies, and fragmentation energies of Fe$$_n$$ clusters ($$n=2-6$$): a density functional theory study. J Phys Chem A 107(36):7013–7023. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp030288p10.1021/jp030288p ↗
33. Anisimov VI, Zaanen J, Andersen OK (1991) Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys Rev B 44(3):943–954. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943. Publisher: American Physical Society10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
34. Mosey NJ, Carter EA (2007) Ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT + U calculations. Phys Rev B 76(15):155123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.15512310.1103/PhysRevB.76.155123 ↗
35. Rollmann G, Herper HC, Entel P (2006) Electron correlation effects in the Fe dimer. J Phys Chem A 110(37):10799–10804. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp061794s10.1021/jp061794s ↗
36. Becke AD (1993) A new mixing of Hartree-Fock and local density-functional theories. J Chem Phys 98(2):1372–1377. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.46430410.1063/1.464304 ↗
37. Hafner J (2008) Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: density-functional theory and beyond. J Comput Chem 29(13):2044–2078. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2105710.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
38. Hohenberg P, Kohn W (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 136(3B):864–871. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
39. Hobbs D, Kresse G, Hafner J (2000) Fully unconstrained noncollinear magnetism within the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 62(17):11556–11570. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1155610.1103/PhysRevB.62.11556 ↗
40. Dal Corso A (2010) Density functional perturbation theory within the projector augmented wave method. Phys Rev B 81(7):075123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.07512310.1103/PhysRevB.81.075123 ↗
41. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50(24):17953–17979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
42. Francisco E, Pueyo L (1987) Accurate calculation of spin-orbit coupling constants for 3 d atoms and ions with effective core potentials and reduced basis sets. Phys Rev A 36(5):1978–1982. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.36.197810.1103/PhysRevA.36.1978 ↗
43. Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ (1994) Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J Phys Chem 98(45):11623–11627. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100096a00110.1021/j100096a001 ↗
44. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77(18):3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
45. Haas P, Tran F, Blaha P, Schwarz K, Laskowski R (2009) Insight into the performance of GGA functionals for solid-state calculations. Phys Rev B 80(19):195109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.19510910.1103/PhysRevB.80.195109 ↗
46. Dudarev SL, Botton GA, Savrasov SY, Humphreys CJ, Sutton AP (1998) Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an lsda+u study. Phys Rev B 57:1505–1509. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
47. Fonseca Guerra C, Handgraaf J-W, Baerends EJ, Bickelhaupt FM (2004) Voronoi deformation density (vdd) charges: assessment of the mulliken, bader, hirshfeld, weinhold, and vdd methods for charge analysis. J Comput Chem 25(2):189–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10351. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.1035110.1002/jcc.10351 ↗
48. Deringer VL, Tchougréeff AL, Dronskowski R (2011) Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. J Phys Chem A 115(21):5461–5466. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202489s10.1021/jp202489s ↗
49. Maintz S, Deringer VL, Tchougréeff AL, Dronskowski R (2016) Lobster: A tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based dft. J Comput Chem 37(11):1030–1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2430010.1002/jcc.24300 ↗
50. Nelson R, Ertural C, George J, Deringer VL, Hautier G, Dronskowski R (2020) LOBSTER: Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional theory. J Comput Chem 41(21):1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2635310.1002/jcc.26353 ↗
51. Naik AA, Ueltzen K, Ertural C, Jackson AJ, George J (2024) Lobsterpy: a package to automatically analyze lobster runs. J Open Sourc Softw 9(94):6286. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0628610.21105/joss.06286 ↗
52. Waroquiers D, George J, Horton M, Schenk S, Persson KA, Rignanese G-M, Gonze X, Hautier G (2020) ChemEnv: a fast and robust coordination environment identification tool. Acta Crystallogr B 76(4):683–695. https://doi.org/10.1107/S205252062000799410.1107/S2052520620007994 ↗
53. Ong SP, Richards WD, Jain A, Hautier G, Kocher M, Cholia S, Gunter D, Chevrier VL, Persson KA, Ceder G (2013) Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput Mater Sci 68:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
54. Lian L, Su CX, Armentrout PB (1992) Collision-induced dissociation of Fe$$n^+$$ (n=2-19) with Xe: Bond energies, geometric structures, and dissociation pathways. J Chem Phys 97(6):4072–4083. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463912. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/97/6/4072/19000751/4072_1_online.pdf10.1063/1.463912 ↗
55. Villiers KAd, Kaschula CH, Egan TJ, Marques HM (2006) Speciation and structure of ferriprotoporphyrin IX in aqueous solution: spectroscopic and diffusion measurements demonstrate dimerization, but not $$\mu $$-oxo dimer formation. J Biol Inorganic Chem 12:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-006-0170-110.1007/s00775-006-0170-1 ↗
56. Marlton SJP, Liu C, Watkins P, Buntine JT, Bieske EJ (2023) Bond dissociation energies for Fe$$2+$$, Fe$$_2$$O$$^+$$, and Fe$$_2$$O$$2+$$ clusters determined through threshold photodissociation in a cryogenic ion trap. J Chem Phys 159(2):024302. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0155548. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0155548/18083086/024302_1_5.0155548.pdf10.1063/5.0155548 ↗
57. Sirirak J, Harding DJ, Harding P, Liu L, Telfer SG (2015) Solvatomorphism and electronic communication in fe$$III$$ n, n-bis(salicylidene)-1,3-propanediamine dimers. Aust J Chem 68:766. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch1444110.1071/ch14441 ↗
58. Golnak R, Xiao J, Atak K, Khan M, Suljoti E, Aziz EF (2015) Local energy gap opening induced by hemin dimerization in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem B 119:3058–3062. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509966q10.1021/jp509966q ↗
59. Frøen EH, Adler P, Valldor M (2023) Synthesis and properties of ba6fe2te3s7, with an fe dimer in a magnetic singlet state. Inorg Chem 62:12548–12556. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c0177510.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01775 ↗
60. He Z, He K, Robertson A, Kirkland A, Kim D, Ihm J, Yoon E, Lee G, Warner J (2014) Atomic structure and dynamics of metal dopant pairs in graphene. Nano Lett 14:3766–3772. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500682j10.1021/nl500682j ↗
61. Hübner O, Sauer J (2002) Confirmation of $$ 9{\Sigma }_g^-$$ and $$ 8{\Sigma }_u^-$$ ground states of fe$$_2$$ and fe$$_2^-$$ by casscf/mrci. Chem Phys Lett 358(5):442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00673-510.1016/S0009-2614(02)00673-5 ↗
62. Yanagisawa S, Tsuneda T, Hirao K (2000) An investigation of density functionals: the first-row transition metal dimer calculations. J Chem Phys 112(2):545–553. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480546. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/112/2/545/19226028/545_1_online.pdf10.1063/1.480546 ↗
63. Barden CJ, Rienstra-Kiracofe JC, Schaefer I. Henry, F. (2000) Homonuclear 3d transition-metal diatomics: a systematic density functional theory study. J Chem Phys 113(2):690–700. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481916. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/113/2/690/19079330/690_1_online.pdf10.1063/1.481916 ↗
64. Noodleman L (1981) Valence bond description of antiferromagnetic coupling in transition metal dimers. J Chem Phys 74(10):5737–5743. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.440939. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/74/10/5737/18928366/5737_1_online.pdf10.1063/1.440939 ↗
65. Błoński P, Hafner J (2009) Magnetic anisotropy of transition-metal dimers: density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B. 79:224418. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.22441810.1103/PhysRevB.79.224418 ↗
66. Du J, Sun X, Wang H (2008) The confirmation of accurate combination of functional and basis set for transition-metal dimers: Fe$$_2$$, co$$_2$$, ni$$_2$$, ru$$_2$$, rh$$_2$$, pd$$_2$$, os$$_2$$, ir$$_2$$, and pt$$_2$$. Int J Quant Chem 108(9):1505–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.2168410.1002/qua.21684 ↗
67. Noro T, Ballard C, Palmer MH, Tatewaki H (1994) The ground state of the Fe$$_2$$ molecule. J Chem Phys 100(1):452–458. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.46695910.1063/1.466959 ↗
68. Yanagisawa S, Tsuneda T, Hirao K (2000) An investigation of density functionals: the first-row transition metal dimer calculations. J Chem Phys 112(2):545–553. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.48054610.1063/1.480546 ↗
69. Montano PA, Shenoy GK (1980) Exafs study of iron monomers and dimers isolated in solid argon. Solid State Commun 35(1):53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(80)90769-310.1016/0038-1098(80)90769-3 ↗
70. Purdum H, Montano PA, Shenoy GK, Morrison T (1982) Extended-x-ray-absorption-fine-structure study of small fe molecules isolated in solid neon. Phys Rev B 25:4412–4417. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.25.441210.1103/PhysRevB.25.4412 ↗
71. Moskovits M, DiLella DP (1980) Di-iron and nickeliron. J Chem Phys 73(10):4917–4924. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.440021. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/73/10/4917/18925999/4917_1_online.pdf10.1063/1.440021 ↗
72. Dhar S, Kestner NR (1988) Electronic structure of the $${\rm fe }2$$ molecule in the local-spin-density approximation. Phys Rev A 38:1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.111110.1103/PhysRevA.38.1111 ↗
73. Castro M, Salahub DR (1993) Theoretical study of the structure and binding of iron clusters: $${\rm fe_n}$$ (n$$\le $$5). Phys Rev B 47:10955–10958. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1095510.1103/PhysRevB.47.10955 ↗
74. Castro M, Jamorski C, Salahub DR (1997) Structure, bonding, and magnetism of small Fe$$_n$$, Co$$_n$$, and Ni$$_n$$ clusters, n$$\le $$5. Chem Phys Lett 271(1):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00420-X10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00420-X ↗
75. Gutsev GL, Belay KG, Bozhenko KV, Gutsev LG, Ramachandran BR (2016) A comparative study of small 3d-metal oxide (FeO)$$_n$$, (CoO)$$_n$$, and (NiO)$$_n$$ clusters. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:27858–27867. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP03241A10.1039/C6CP03241A ↗
76. Korobova JG, Nikitina IA, Bazhanov DI, Ruiz-Díaz P (2020) Oxygen-mediated superexchange interactions and their impact on the structural stability, magnetic order, and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of one-dimensional co-oxide chains on rh(553) step-surfaces. J Phys Chem C 124(47):26026–26036. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0776210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07762 ↗
77. Cox DM, Trevor DJ, Whetten RL, Rohlfing EA, Kaldor A (1985) Magnetic behavior of free-iron and iron oxide clusters. Phys Rev B 32:7290–7298. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.729010.1103/PhysRevB.32.7290 ↗
78. Wu H, Desai SR, Wang L-S (1996) Observation and photoelectron spectroscopic study of novel mono- and diiron oxide molecules: FeO$$y^-$$ ($$y = 1-4$$) and Fe$$_2$$Oy$$^-$$ ($$y = 1-5$$). J Am Chem Soc 118(22):5296–5301. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja954153b10.1021/ja954153b ↗
79. Chertihin GV, Saffel W, Yustein JT, Andrews L, Neurock M, Ricca A, Bauschlicher CW (1996) Reactions of laser-ablated iron atoms with oxygen molecules in condensing argon infrared spectra and density functional calculations of iron oxide product molecules. J Phys Chem 100(13):5261–5273. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp953198w10.1021/jp953198w ↗
80. Gutsev GL, Charles Bauschlicher J, W., Zhai, H.-J., Wang, L.-S. (2003) Structural and electronic properties of iron monoxide clusters Fe$$_n$$O and Fe$$_n$$O$$^-$$? ($$n=2-6$$): a combined photoelectron spectroscopy and density functional theory study. J Chem Phys 119(21):11135–11145. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1621856. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/119/21/11135/19321641/11135_1_online.pdf10.1063/1.1621856 ↗
81. Jones NO, Reddy BV, Rasouli F, Khanna SN (2005) Structural growth in iron oxide clusters: rings, towers, and hollow drums. Phys Rev B 72:165411. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.16541110.1103/PhysRevB.72.165411 ↗