journal article·2025-02Open access

Increasing the societal impacts of nanotechnology applications in food and agricultural systems

Melanie Kah, Carmen Gomes

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 27· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract This short perspective reflects on the last two decades of intense research in the field of nanoscale science and engineering for agriculture and food systems. Despite significant advances in knowledge and innovation that are well recognized in the scientific community, only a small number of nanoproducts have reached the market, and the societal impact of the research thus remains relatively limited. We want to reflect on what may be key reasons for this and propose four tips that will help reframe and improve some of our research practices with the aim of increasing our impact. Our views were collected through consultations and engagement with a wide range of stakeholders inside and outside of the scientific field, including regulators, successful entrepreneurs, potential users, and consumers. We want to encourage scientists to increase their consideration of actors outside of the scientific field in order to develop nanotechnologies that are needed, competitive, and acceptable to both regulators and users/consumers. The benefits of a technology must be assessed with a better consideration of the whole system (instead of a small part of it) and in a specific context that recognizes climatic, cultural, political, and economic differences. Essential qualities to increase our impact include a high capacity to continuously adapt and work in teams that bring a multidisciplinary and multisectoral understanding of the system, which is not always fully compatible with the way academic performances are currently evaluated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Scott NR, Chen H (2002) Nanoscale science and engineering for agriculture and food systems. Roadmap report of national planning workshop. Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service of the United States Department of Agriculture
2. Miernicki M, Hofmann T, Eisenberger I, von der Kammer F, Praetorius A (2019) Legal and practical challenges in classifying nanomaterials according to regulatory definitions. Nat Nanotechnol 14:208–21610.1038/s41565-019-0396-z ↗
3. Siimes N, Sharp EL, Lewis N, Kah M (2022) Determining acceptance and rejection of nano-enabled agriculture: a case study of the New Zealand wine industry. NanoImpact 28:10043210.1016/j.impact.2022.100432 ↗
4. NSF’s Innovation Corps (I-CorpsTM) | NSF - National Science Foundation. https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/i-corps. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
5. Robinson LD, Cawthray JL, West SE, Bonn A, Ansine J (2018) Ten principles of citizen science. In: Bonn A et al. (eds.) Citizen Science. UCL Press, pp 27–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.910.2307/j.ctv550cf2.9 ↗
6. Roco MC (2020) Principles of convergence in nature and society and their application: from nanoscale, digits, and logic steps to global progress. J Nanopart Res 22:32110.1007/s11051-020-05032-0 ↗
7. Crowston K (2016) Open source technology development. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Handbook of science and technology convergence. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_2910.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_29 ↗
8. Dougherty D (2012) The maker movement. Innovations: Technol Gov Glob 7:11–14
9. NNI. Responsible development, social science, and the national nanotechnology initiative: a workshop to explore past and future intersections | National Nanotechnology Initiative. https://www.nano.gov/socialscienceworkshop. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
10. CNS-ASU. Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. https://cns.asu.edu/. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
11. Samal L, Wright A, Healey MJ, Linder JA, Bates DW (2014) Meaningful use and quality of care. JAMA Intern Med 174:997–99810.1001/jamainternmed.2014.662 ↗
12. McLamore ES, Datta SPA (2023) A connected world: system-level support through biosensors. Annu Rev Anal Chem 16:285–30910.1146/annurev-anchem-100322-040914 ↗
13. Kumari R et al (2023) Regulation and safety measures for nanotechnology-based agri-products. Front Genome Ed 5:120098710.3389/fgeed.2023.1200987 ↗
14. Kah M et al (2021) Comprehensive framework for human health risk assessment of nanopesticides. Nat Nanotechnol 16:955–96410.1038/s41565-021-00964-7 ↗
15. EFSA Scientific Committee et al (2021) Guidance on risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain: human and animal health. EFSA J 19:e0676810.2903/j.efsa.2021.6768 ↗
16. FDA (2024) US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: pre-petition consultations for food additives and color additives. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-pre-petition-consultations-food-additives-and-color-additives. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
17. National Research Council (2015) Enhancing the effectiveness of team science | The National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/19007/enhancing-the-effectiveness-of-team-science. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
18. Fontanarosa P, Bauchner H, Flanagin A (2017) Authorship and team science. JAMA 318:2433–243710.1001/jama.2017.19341 ↗
19. Convergence accelerator | NSF - National Science Foundation. https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/convergence-accelerator. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
20. Partnerships for innovation (PFI) | NSF - National Science Foundation. https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/pfi. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
21. Open Topic – AFWERX (2023). https://afwerx.com/divisions/ventures/open-topic/. Accessed 24 Jan 2025
22. (2023) Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02204-810.1007/978-3-319-02204-8 ↗