RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigation of the key factors influencing cavity collapse using molecular dynamics simulation
This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.
Source abstract
Abstract
Cavitation greatly affects the safe and stable operation of hydraulic machineries and thus has been key challenge in this field. Cavity collapse caused by cavitation can form transient characteristics such as high temperature, high pressure, strong shock wave, and high-speed micro-jet, which may cause serious damage to nearby solids. Cavitation can be affected by many intercoupled factors during the collapse transition. However, existing research rarely focuses on the analysis of its influencing factors. This research aims to reveal the collapse mechanism of cavitation, the parameters of each factor, and the influencing rules of the cavity collapse process. Molecular dynamics method was employed to analyze the evolution process of cavity collapse in the computational domain of liquid argon under different conditions. The influences of relaxation time, system temperature, and cavity size on cavity collapse were investigated. These simulation results showed that when the relaxation time was within 1 ns, the longer the relaxation time, the more likely the system molecules formed a stable state, and the more easily the cavities collapsed. When the relaxation time was greater than 0.2 ns, the difference in the process of collapse was smaller. When the temperature of the system was within 80 K, as the temperature increased, the thermal motion of the molecules intensified to increase the kinetic energy and weaken the intermolecular gravitation, shortening the time for cavities to reach the collapse point. When the temperature reached 80 K, as the temperature continued to increase, the time of collapse point and the process basically unchanged. When the initial cavity size was within 15 Å, the larger the initial cavity size, the less likely the cavities tended to collapse. When the cavity size was larger than 15 Å, the cavities were further less likely to collapse as the cavity size increased. The research results can provide theoretical support for the study of cavitation characteristics.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps · Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Amarendra HJ, Hallalli GB, Madhusudhana G, Mahendra HD, Athani MK (2018) Effect of cavitation inducers’ apex angle on erosion resistance of SS304 in the slurry pot test rig [J]. Materialstoday:proceeding 5:17320–1732410.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.144 ↗
2. Antony AC, Liang T, Akhade SA, Janik MJ, Phillpot SR, Sinnott SB (2016) Effect of surface chemistry on water interaction with Cu(111)[J]. Langmuir 32(32):8061–807010.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01974 ↗
3. Che Z, Theodorakis PE (2017a) Formation, dissolution and properties of surface nanobubbles[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci 10(27):123–12910.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.027 ↗
4. Che Z, Theodorakis PE (2017b) Formation, dissolution and properties of surface nanobubbles [J]. J Colloid Interface Sci 487:123–12910.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.027 ↗
5. Hong Y, Zhu R-Z, Jiu-An W (2012) Size-dependent surface tension of a cylindrical nanobubble in liquid Ar[J]. Atomic and Molecular Physics, Chin Phys B 21(8):146–151
6. Jawale RH, Gogate PR (2019) Novel approaches based on hydrodynamic cavitation for treatment of wastewater containing potassium thiocyanate[J]. Ultrason Sonochem 52:214–22310.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.11.019 ↗
7. Li F, Ni M, Li J (2015) Numerical study of transient bubble growth and collapse in microscale[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 32(01):31–37
8. Luo X, Bin J, Yoshinobu T (2016) A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery[J]. J Hydrodyn 28(03):335-35810.1016/S1001-6058(16)60638-8 ↗
9. Ma X, Huang B, Li Y, Chang Q, Qiu S, Su Z, Fu X, Wang G (2018) Numerical simulation of single bubble dynamics under acoustic travelling waves[J]. Ultrason Sonochem 42:619–63010.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.12.021 ↗
10. Mahagaonkar SB, Brahmankar PK, Seemikeri CY (2008) Effect of shot peening parameters on microhardness of AISI 1045 and 316L material: an analysis using design of experiment[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:563–57410.1007/s00170-007-1222-6 ↗
11. Peng C, Tian S, Li G (2018) Joint experiments of cavitation jet: High-speed visualization and erosion test[J]. Ocean Eng 149:1–1310.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.009 ↗
12. Rajoriya S, Bargole S, Saharan VK (2017) Degradation of a cationic dye using hydrodynamic cavitation coupled with other oxidative agents: reaction mechanism and pathway[J]. Ultrason Sonochem 34:183–19410.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.05.028 ↗
13. Raymond A, Diemand J, Tanaka KK et al (2014) Bubble evolution and properties in homogeneous nucleation simulations.[J]. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 90(6):06330110.1103/PhysRevE.90.063301 ↗
14. Ren XD, Wang J, Yuan SQ, Adu-Gyamfifi S, Tong YQ, Zuo CY, Zhang HF (2018) Mechanical effect of laser-induced cavitation bubble of 2A02 alloy[J]. Opt Laser Technol 105:180–18410.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.039 ↗
15. Šarc A, Kosel J, Stopar D, Oder M, Dular M (2018) Removal of bacteria Legionella pneumophila, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus subtilis by (super)cavitation[J]. Ultrason Sonochem 42:228–23610.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.11.004 ↗
16. Sasikumar K, Keblinski P (2014) Molecular dynamics investigation of nanoscale cavitation dynamics[J]. J Chem Phys 141(23):12B648_1–12B6479010.1063/1.4903783 ↗
17. Sekine M, Yasuoka K, Kinjo T, Matsumoto M (2008) Liquid–vapor nucleation simulation of Lennard-Jones fluid by molecular dynamics method[J]. Fluid Dyn Res 40:597–60510.1016/j.fluiddyn.2007.12.012 ↗
18. Wang P, Gao W, Wilkerson J et al (2016) Cavitation of water by volume-controlled stretching[J]. Extreme Mech Lett 1110.1016/j.eml.2016.12.004 ↗
19. Yamamoto T, Hatanaka S-i, Komarov SV (2019) Fragmentation of cavitation bubble in ultrasound field under small pressure amplitude[J]. Ultrason Sonochem 58:10468410.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104684 ↗