The effective recovery of CuO nano-particles from organic solvent by using froth flotation
Source abstract
Abstract
The recovery of nano-catalysts from organic wastewater is still one of the most significant problems in the catalytic industry. In this work, froth flotation was used to solve this problem. CuO nano-particles were considered as the desired materials. First, four surfactants were screened for determining a suitable collector through comparing their foam properties and capture capacity to CuO nano-particles. Subsequently, froth flotation was performed by using cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB) as the collector. Under the suitable operation conditions, the enrichment ratio and recovery percentage of CuO nano-particles reached as high as 20.52 and 91.50%, respectively. Finally, the size distribution and morphology of CuO nano-particles before and after froth flotation were characterized. Experimental results indicated that the dispersibility of the recovered CuO nano-particles after froth flotation was better than that of the commercial CuO nano-particles due to the existence of surfactant molecules around the nano-particle surface. This work is expected to provide a new insight into the effective recovery of nano-catalysts from the downstream industrial effluent and to facilitate the industrialization of froth flotation in the green catalytic industry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Alexander S, Eastoe J, Lord AM, Guittard F, Barron AR (2015) Branched hydrocarbon low surface energy materials for superhydrophobic nanoparticle derived surfaces. Acs Appl Mater Inter 8:660–66610.1021/acsami.5b09784 ↗
2. Ata S (2012) Phenomena in the froth phase of flotation—a review. Int J Miner Process 102:1–1210.1016/j.minpro.2011.09.008 ↗
3. Calabriso A, Borello D, Romano GP, Cedola L, Del Zotto L, Santori SG (2017) Bubbly flow mapping in the anode channel of a direct methanol fuel cell via PIV investigation. Appl Energ 185:1245–125510.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.042 ↗
4. Chen H, Jiang G, Li L, Liu Y, Huang Q, Jiang T, Du X (2015) Facile fabrication of highly flexible grapheme paper for photocatalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. B Mater Sci 38:1457–146310.1007/s12034-015-1037-2 ↗
5. Colangelo G, Favale E, Miglietta P, Milanese M, Risi A (2017) Thermal conductivity, viscosity and stability of Al2O3-diathermic oil nanofluids for solar energy systems. Energy 95:124–13610.1016/j.energy.2015.11.032 ↗
6. Coward T, Lee JG, Caldwell GS (2015) The effect of bubble size on the efficiency and economics of harvesting microalgae by foam flotation. J Appl Phycol 27:733–74210.1007/s10811-014-0384-5 ↗
7. Cunningham VJ, Giakoumatos EC, Ireland PM, Mable CJ, Armes SP, Wanless EJ (2017) Giant Pickering droplets: effect of nanoparticle size and morphology on stability. Langmuir. 33:7669–767910.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01383 ↗
8. Descorme C (2017) Catalytic wastewater treatment: oxidation and reduction processes. Recent studies on chlorophenols. Catal Today 297:324–33410.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.039 ↗
9. Esumi K, Toyoda A, Goino M, Suhara T, Fukui H, Koide Y (1998) Adsorption characteristics of cationic surfactants on titanium dioxide with quaternary ammonium groups and their adsolubilization. J Colloid Interf Sci 202:377–38410.1006/jcis.1998.5455 ↗
10. Fameau AL, Saint-Jalmes A (2017) Non-aqueous foams: current understanding on the formation and stability mechanisms. Adv Colloid Interfac 247:454–46410.1016/j.cis.2017.02.007 ↗
11. Friberg SE (2010) Foams from non-aqueous systems. Curr Opin Colloid In 15:359–36410.1016/j.cocis.2010.05.011 ↗
12. Gawande M, Rathi A, Branco P, Varma R (2013) Sustainable utility of magnetically recyclable nano-catalysts in water: applications in organic synthesis. Appl Sci 3(4):656–67410.3390/app3040656 ↗
13. He J, Ji W, Yao L, Wang Y, Khezri B, Webster RD, Chen H (2014) Strategy for nano-catalysis in a fixed-bed system. Adv Mat 26:4152–4155
14. Hu N, Liu W, Ding LL, Wu ZL, Yin H, Huang D, Li HZ, Jin LX, Zheng HJ (2017) Removal of methylene blue from its aqueous solution by froth flotation: hydrophobic silica nanoparticle as a collector. J Nanopart Res 19(2):46–5310.1007/s11051-017-3762-5 ↗
15. Jatti VS, Singh TP (2015) Copper oxide nano-particles as friction-reduction and anti-wear additives in lubricating oil. J Mech Sci Technol 29(2):793–79810.1007/s12206-015-0141-y ↗
16. Kajiura M, Wagai R, Hayashi K (2014) Optimal thermolysis conditions for soil carbon storage on plant residue burning: modeling the trade-off between thermal decomposition and subsequent biodegradation. J Environ Qual 44:228–23510.2134/jeq2014.06.0279 ↗
17. Khatun N, Gogoi A, Basu P, Das P, Patel BK (2014) CuO nanoparticle catalysed synthesis of 2 H-indazoles under ligand free conditions. RSC Adv 4(8):4080–408410.1039/C3RA45298K ↗
18. Kupka N, Rudolph M (2018) Froth flotation of scheelite–a review. Int J Min Sc Technol 28(3):373–38410.1016/j.ijmst.2017.12.001 ↗
19. Langevin D (2015) Bubble coalescence in pure liquids and in surfactant solutions. Curr Opin Colloid in 20:92–9710.1016/j.cocis.2015.03.005 ↗
20. Letellier P, Mayaffre A, Turmine M (2007) Drop size effect on contact angle explained by nonextensive thermodynamics. Young’s equation revisited. J Colloid Interf Sci 314:604–61410.1016/j.jcis.2007.05.085 ↗
21. Li J, Wu Z, Li R (2012) Technology of streptomycin sulfate separation by two-stage separation. Biotechnol Prog 28(3):733–73910.1002/btpr.1543 ↗
22. Liang HW, Wang L, Chen PY, Lin HT, Chen LF, He D, Yu SH (2010) Carbonaceous nanofiber membranes for selective filtration and separation of nano-particles. Adv Mater 22:4691–469510.1002/adma.201001863 ↗
23. Neely CB, Eiamwat J, Du L, Loha V, Prokop A, Tanner RD. (2001) Modeling a batch foam fractionation process. Biologiabratislava 57(6):583–590
24. Novak JP, Nickerson C, Franzen S, Feldheim DL (2001) Purification of molecularly bridged metal nanoparticle arrays by centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography. Anal Chem 73:5758–576110.1021/ac010812t ↗
25. Rakoczy R, Masiuk S (2009) Experimental study of bubble size distribution in a liquid column exposed to a rotating magnetic field. Chem Eng Process 48(3):1229–124010.1016/j.cep.2009.05.001 ↗
26. Ren J, Lu S, Shen J, Yu C (2001) Research on the composite dispersion of ultra-fine powder in the air. Mater Chem Phys 69:204–20910.1016/S0254-0584(00)00396-5 ↗
27. Shen YH (1998) Colloidal titanium dioxide separation from water by foam flotation. Sep Sci Technol 33:2623–263510.1080/01496399808545323 ↗
28. Stark WJ, Stoessel PR, Wohlleben W, Hafner A (2015) Industrial applications of nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 44:5793–580510.1039/C4CS00362D ↗
29. Tshilumbu NN, Masalova I (2015) Stabilization of highly concentrated emulsions with oversaturated dispersed phase: effect of surfactant/particle ratio. Chem Eng Res Des 102:216–23310.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.025 ↗
30. Varma RS (2014) Nano-catalysts with magnetic core: sustainable options for greener synthesis. Sustain Chem Process 2:11–1810.1186/2043-7129-2-11 ↗
31. Wohlleben W, Mielke J, Bianchin A, Ghanem A, Freiberger H, Rauscher H, Gemeinert M, Hodoroaba VD (2017) Reliable nanomaterial classification of powders using the volume-specific surface area method. J Nanopart Res 19:61–6810.1007/s11051-017-3741-x ↗
32. Yin X, Zhang S, Dong Y, Liu S, Gu J, Chen Y, Zhang X, Zhang X, Shao Y (2015) Ionic current rectification in organic solutions with quartz nanopipettes. Anal Chem 87:9070–907710.1021/acs.analchem.5b02337 ↗
33. Zhang J, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zheng X, Wang Z (2008) Nano-CuO-catalyzed Ullmann coupling of phenols with aryl halides under ligand-free conditions. Eur J Org Chem 2008(30):5112–511610.1002/ejoc.200800637 ↗
34. Zhu MY, Diao GW (2012) High catalytic activity of CuO nanorods for oxidation of cyclohexene to 2-cyclohexene-1-one. Catal Sci Technol 2:82–8410.1039/C1CY00274K ↗