Morphology-controlled preparation of a-Fe2O3 during evaporating aqueous FeCl3 solution and investigating the electrochemical properties of various a-Fe2O3 morphologies
Source abstract
Abstract
Morphology-controlled preparation of a-Fe2O3 has been successfully realized by evaporating aqueous FeCl3 solution. By just simply changing the reaction temperature and time, nanorods, peanut-like and sphere-like morphologies, of a-Fe2O3 could be obtained. The elemental nanorods have a width range of 10–20 nm. On the basis of time-dependent experiments, the formation mechanisms of various nanostructures were proposed. The dynamic formation process showed that with increasing reaction temperature, the outward bending played critical role on the morphology evolution. Furthermore, when tested as anodes, the as-obtained a-Fe2O3 nanostructures showed structure-dependent electrochemical properties. Among them, the a-Fe2O3 nanorods exhibited ultrahigh reversible capacity and excellent capacity retention over 50 cycles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Almeida TP, Fay M (2009) Process map for the hydrothermal synthesis of a-Fe2O3 nanorods. J Phys Chem C 113:18689–18698. doi: 10.1021/jp907081j10.1021/jp907081j ↗
2. An Z, Zhang J (2012) Novel peanut-like a-Fe2O3 superstructures: oriented aggregation and Ostwald ripening in a one-pot solvothermal process. Powder Technol 217:274–280. doi: org/10.1016/j.poetec.2011.10.03810.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.038 ↗
3. Chen HM, Zhao YQ (2010) Glycine-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of peculiar porous a-Fe2O3 nanospheres with excellent gas-sensing properties. Anal Chim Acta 659:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.04010.1016/j.aca.2009.11.040 ↗
4. Chirita M, Grozescu I (2009) Fe2O3-nanoparticles, physical properties and their photochemical and photoelectrochemical applications. Chem Bull 54(68):1–8
5. Cortie MB, McDonagh AM (2011) Synthesis and optical properties of hybrid and alloy plasmonic nanoparticles. Chem Rev 111:3713–3735. doi: 10.1021/cr100252910.1021/cr1002529 ↗
6. Fu XQ, Bei FL (2009) Fe2O3: nanoparticles, physical properties and their photochemical and photoelectrochemical applications. J Raman Spectrosc 54(40):1290–1295. doi: 0.1002/jrs.2281
7. Hao QY, Liu S (2011) Flexible morphology-controlled synthesis of mesoporous hierarchical a-Fe2O3 architectures and their gas-sensing properties. Cryst Eng Commun 13(2):806–810. doi: 10.1039/c0ce0019410.1039/C0CE00194E ↗
8. Hu YH, Chen KZ (2007) Crystal splitting in the growth of β-FeO(OH). J Cryst Growth 308:185–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.07.03510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.07.035 ↗
9. Lee SH, Liddell CM (2009) Anisotropic magnetic colloids: a strategy to form complex structures using nonspherical building blocks. Small 5(17):1957–1962. doi: 10.1002/smll.20090013510.1002/smll.200900135 ↗
10. Li G, Liu MY (2011) Mesoporous a-Fe2O3 nanospheres: structural evolution and investigation of magnetic properties. Chem Eur J 17:4323–4329. doi: 10.1002/chem.20100306810.1002/chem.201003068 ↗
11. Liu C, Ma J (2012) Periodical structural conversion and its mechanism in hematite: from nanospindles, to nanotubes, to nanotires. RSC Adv 2(5):1009–1012. doi: 10.1039/c1ra00595b10.1039/C1RA00595B ↗
12. Liu H, Wang GX (2009) Electrochemical performance of a-Fe2O3 nanorods as anode material for lithium-ion cells. Electrochim Acta 54:1733–1736. doi: :10.1016/j.electacta.2008.09.07110.1016/j.electacta.2008.09.071 ↗
13. Ma JM (2012) Porous platelike hematite mesocrystals: synthesis, catalytic and gas-sensing applications. J Mater Chem. doi: 10.1039/C2JM30216K
14. Ma JM, Lian JB (2010) a-Fe2O3: hydrothermal synthesis, magnetic and electrochemical properties. J Phys Chem C 114:10671–10676. doi: 10.1021/jp102243g10.1021/jp102243g ↗
15. Machala L, Tucek J (2011) Polymorphous transformations of nanometric iron (III) oxide: a review. Chem Mater 23:3255–3272. doi: org/10.1021/cm200397g10.1021/cm200397g ↗
16. Pradhan GK, Parida KM (2011) Fabrication, growth mechanism, and characterization of a-Fe2O3 nanorods. ACS Appl Mater Interface 3:317–323. doi: org/10.1021/am100944b10.1021/am100944b ↗
17. Qi LM, Colfen H (2000) Control of barite morphology by double-hydrophilic block copolymers. Chem Mater 12:2392–2402. doi: 10.1021/cm001040510.1021/cm0010405 ↗
18. Sugimoto TD, Wang YH (1998) Mechanism of the shape and structure control of monodispersed a-Fe2O3 particles by sulfate ions. J Colloid Interface Sci 207:137–149. doi: 0021-9797/9810.1006/jcis.1998.5741 ↗
19. Woo K, Lee HJ (2003) Sol–gel mediated synthesis of a-Fe2O3 nanorods. Adv Mater 15(20):1761–1763. doi: 10.1002/adma.20030556110.1002/adma.200305561 ↗
20. Wu XL, Guo YG (2008) a-Fe2O3 nanostructures: inorganic salt-controlled synthesis and their electrochemical performance toward lithium storage. J Phys Chem C 112:16824–16829. doi: 10.1021/jp805830710.1021/jp8058307 ↗
21. Wu CZ, Yin P (2006) Synthesis of hematite (a-Fe2O3) nanorods: diameter-size and shape effects on their applications in magnetism, lithium ion battery, and gas sensors. J Phys Chem B 110:17806–17812. doi: 10.1021/jp063390610.1021/jp0633906 ↗
22. Xie Y, Huang JX, Li B (2000) A novel peanut-like nanostructure of II–VI semiconductor CdS and ZnS. Adv Mater 12(20):1523–1526. doi: 0935-9648/00/2010-152310.1002/1521-4095(200010)12:20<1523::AID-ADMA1523>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
23. Xuan SH, Hao LY, Jiang WQ (2007) A FeCO3 precursor-based route to microsized peanutlike Fe3O4. Cryst Growth Des 7(2):430–434. doi: 10.1021/cg060459q10.1021/cg060459q ↗
24. Yin WY, Chen X (2009) a-Fe2O3 nanocrystals: controllable SSA-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, growth mechanism, and magnetic properties. J Phys Chem C 113:15897–15903. doi: 10.1021/jp904413m10.1021/jp904413m ↗
25. Yu RB, Li ZM (2009) Morphology manipulation of a-Fe2O3 in the mixed solvent system. Solid State Sci 11:2056–2059. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.09.00910.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.09.009 ↗