Comment on: “Bidimensional bound states for charged polar nanoparticles”
Source abstract
Abstract
In a recent paper Castellanos-Jaramillo and Castellanos-Moreno proposed a simple quantum-mechanical model for an electron in the vicinity of an ionized nanostructure with a permanent electric dipole. They chose the interaction of the electron with the charge and the dipole in such a way that the resulting Schrödinger equation is separable into radial and angular parts. In this comment we show that those authors did not solve the angular eigenvalue equation with proper periodic boundary conditions and that they also made a mistake in the elimination of the first derivative in the radial equation. Such errors invalidate their results of the Einstein coefficients for the $\left( GaAs\right)3$ system considered.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (2)
Show source-provided references
1. Castellanos-Jaramillo A, Castellanos-Moreno A (2019) Bidimensional bound states for charged polar nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 21:14110.1007/s11051-019-4586-2 ↗
2. Coon SA, Holstein BR (2002) Anomalies in quantum mechanics: the 1/r 2 potential. Am J Phys 70:513–51910.1119/1.1456071 ↗