Book review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
References (8)
Show source-provided references
1. ETC Group. 2003. ‘Size matters: No small matter, II – The case for a global moratorium’. Occasional Paper Series 7(1)
2. Guston D.H., Sarewitz D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Cult. 24: 93–109
3. Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J.C., Pinch T. (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage10.4135/9781412990127 ↗
4. McCray P. (2005). Will small be beautiful? Making policies for our nanotech future. Hist. Technol. 21(2):177–20310.1080/07341510500103735 ↗
5. Roco M.C. (2005). International Perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005. J. Nanoparticle Res. 7(6):707–71210.1007/s11051-005-3141-5 ↗
6. Selin C. 2006 (forthcoming). Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Sci. Technol. Human Values.10.1177/0162243906296918 ↗
7. Willis R., Wilsdon J. (2004). See-through Science. London, Demos
8. Winner L. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MIT Press