Comments on the article by A. J. Lecloux (J Nanopart Res (2015) 17:447) regarding the use of volume-specific surface area (VSSA) to classify nanomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
In November 2015, an article by A. J. Lecloux was published in this journal (J Nanopart Res, 17:447, 2015). The article focused on the use of volume-specific surface area (VSSA) for the implementation of the European Commission's recommended definition of "nanomaterial". In that paper, VSSA values were calculated for polydisperse particulate materials using a particle number-based averaging method which do not agree with earlier results of VSSA simulations of polydisperse materials reported in 2014 by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC). In this contribution, we explain the difference between traditional view of VSSA which was used by the JRC and the proposed model of Lecloux. Through the use of some simple examples for polydisperse materials, it is demonstrated that the latter produces values which neither correspond to the generally accepted definition of VSSA nor relate to the commonly used experimental methods for determining VSSA using gas adsorption. Lecloux's model therefore does not constitute a basis for practical implementation of the EC's definition of nanomaterial using gas adsorption techniques.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials · Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. European Commission (2011) Commission recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial. Off J Eur Union L275:38–40
2. ISO (2010) ISO 9277:2010 Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption – BET method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
3. IUPAC (1997) Compendium of chemical terminology, 2nd ed. (the “Gold Book”). Compiled by McNaught AD and Wilkinson A. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1997). XML on-line corrected version: http://goldbook.iupac.org (2006-) created by Nic M, Jirat J, Kosata B; updates compiled by Jenkins A. ISBN 0-9678550-9-8. doi: 10.1351/goldbook . Last update: 2014-02-24; version: 2.3.3. DOI of this term: doi: 10.1351/goldbook.S0580610.1351/goldbook ↗
4. Kreyling WG, Semmler-Behnke M, Chaudhry Q (2010) A complementary definition of nanomaterial. Nano Today 5:165–16810.1016/j.nantod.2010.03.004 ↗
5. Lecloux AJ (1981) Texture of catalysts. In: Anderson JR, Boudart M (eds) Catalysis: science and technology, review paper, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–23010.1007/978-3-642-93171-0_4 ↗
6. Lecloux AJ (2015) Discussion about the use of the volume-specific surface area (VSSA) as criteria to identify nanomaterials according to the EU definition. J Nanopart Res 17:44710.1007/s11051-015-3239-3 ↗
7. Lecloux AJ et al (1988) Study of the texture of monodisperse silica sphere samples in the nanometer size range. Colloids Surf 19:359–37410.1016/0166-6622(86)80345-6 ↗
8. Rauscher H, Roebben G (eds) (2015) Towards a review of the EC recommendation for a definition of the term ‘‘nanomaterial’’ Part 3: scientific-technical evaluation of options to clarify the definition and to facilitate its implementation. JRC report EUR 27240 EN. doi: 10.2788/77040110.2788/770401 ↗
9. Roebben G, Rauscher H (eds) (2014) Towards a review of the EC recommendation for a definition of the term ‘‘nanomaterial’’ Part 2: assessment of collected information concerning the experience with the definition. JRC report EUR 26744 EN. doi: 10.2787/9728610.2787/97286 ↗
10. SCENIHR (2010) Opinion on the scientific basis for the definition of the term “nanomaterial”. doi: 10.2772/3970310.2772/39703 ↗