RETRACTED ARTICLE: A various soft tissue evaluation of the patients treated by nanocoating orthodontic arch-wires: perceptions in lateral profile photographs and lateral cephalometric radiograps
This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the evaluations of radiography-picture, radiography-real, and picture-real consistencies were evaluated of 9 adult patients photos by 131 dental professionals. Three patients are of the skeletal class I patients whose treatment is completed by using nanocoating orthodontic arch wires, 3 of them are not treated skeletal class III patients, and other patients are not treated skeletal class II. Archwires and brackets produced with developing science and nanotechnology have played an important role in the clinical application of orthodontic treatments. It was aimed to evaluate dental professional’s soft tissue perceptions from lateral profile photos and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 9 adult patients treated at the Orthodontic Department of Near East University, Faculty of Dentistry in 2019. Nine patient profiles, jaw relations, treatment, occlusion, and upper and lower lip properties of patients were asked to evaluate from lateral profile photos and lateral cephalometric radiographs by 131 dental professionals including 29 orthodontics PhD students, 30 general dentists, 46 orthodontists, and 26 oral maxillofacial surgeons. In treatment and upper lip evaluation results, radiography-real consistency was the highest for profile evaluation, followed by radiography-picture and picture-real evaluation. In occlusion evaluation, picture-real consistency was the highest,
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Radiography and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Aksu M, Akarsu B, Sağir M, Özer BK, Gültekin T, Özer İ et al (2008) DİLKAYA TOPLUMUNDA YÜZ İSKELET YAPISININ SEFALOMETRİK ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Arkeometri Sonuçlari Toplantisi 49
2. Al Taki A, Abuhijleh E, Al-Shafei L (2013) Soft tissue profile values in Palestinian adults. Smile Dental J 8(1):26–29. https://doi.org/10.12816/000077010.12816/0000770 ↗
3. Al-Zubaidi SH (2009). The skeletal and soft tissue facial profile in adolescent and adult 9(12), 149–15510.33899/rden.2009.9003 ↗
4. Aydil B, Özer N, Marşan G (2012) Facial soft tissue changes after maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement in high angle class II cases. Int J Med Sci 9(4):316–321. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.424710.7150/ijms.4247 ↗
5. Çelik İ, Toraman M, Mihçioğlu T, Ceritoğlu D (2007) Dental implant planlamasında kullanılan radyografik yöntemlerin değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 13(1):21–28
6. Cevidanes LHC, Motta A, Proffit WR, Ackerman JL, Styner M (2010) Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137(4 SUPPL):S120–S129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.02110.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.021 ↗
7. Cezairli NS (2017) Comparisons of soft tissue thickness measurements in adult patients with various vertical patterns. Meandros Med Dental J 18(2):120–129. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.7637610.4274/meandros.76376 ↗
8. Devi LB, Das A, & Keisam A (2016). Evaluation of soft tissue facial profile in adult Bengali population by photogrammetric method with angular measurements 3(5), 1336–1339
9. Feynman R (2004) Miniaturization. In: Gilbert HD (ed) There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Reinhold, New York, pp 282–296
10. Gerzson S, Pretto V, Closs Q (2013) Soft tissue profile changes in class II patients treated with first bicuspid extraction. Stomatos 19(36):26–35
11. Gökalp H, Şenol A, & Karaca N (2015) SINIF II MALOKLÜZYONDA FRONTAL SİNÜS VE MAKSİLLER BÜYÜME TAHMİNİ: SEFALOMETRİK ÇALIŞMA
12. Javadpour FG, Khanemasjedi M (2014) Soft tissue facial profile and anteroposterior lip positioning in Iranians. Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 32(2):90–95
13. Kasai K (1998) Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 113(6):674–68410.1016/S0889-5406(98)70228-8 ↗
14. Katz A, Redlich M, Rapoport L, Wagner HD, Tenne R (2006) Self-lubricating coatings containing fullerene-like WS 2 nanoparticles for orthodontic wires and other possible medical applications. Tribol Lett 21(2):135–13910.1007/s11249-006-9029-4 ↗
15. Khot PJ, Agrawal M, Agrawal J, Nanjannawar L, Kagi V, & Khot M (2018) Evaluation of soft tissue cephalometric norms for Maharashtrian population using Holdaway analysis. 5(11), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.17354/ijss/2018/3710.17354/ijss/2018/37 ↗
16. Lee R, MacFarlane T, O’Brien K (1999) Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions. Clin Orthod Res 2(2):79–8410.1111/ocr.1999.2.2.79 ↗
17. Lopatienė K, Sidlauskas A, Vasiliauskas A, Cecyte L, Svalkauskiene, V. ve Sidlauskas, M. (2016) Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: a cephalometric study. Medicina 52(2016):307–31410.1016/j.medici.2016.09.005 ↗
18. Lubis Fitria H., Marina Lubis, M., & Bahirrah, S. (2018). The distribution of facial profile photogrammetry of high school students in Medan. 8(Idcsu 2017), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.2991/idcsu-17.2018.3310.2991/idcsu-17.2018.33 ↗
19. Maetevorakul S, Viteporn S (2016) Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with class ii division 1 malocclusion. Prog Orthod 17(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0125-110.1186/s40510-016-0125-1 ↗
20. Mafi P, Ghazisaeidi MR, Mafi A (2005) Ideal soft tissue facial profile in Iranian females. J Craniofac Surg 16(3):508–511. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000171971.21808.d110.1097/01.scs.0000171971.21808.d1 ↗
21. Mohammed SA, Saloom JE, & Hussien HM (2019) Quantifying the soft tissue profile by two different methods in Iraqi adults: a comparative study. 15–21
22. Nalbandyan MS, Ter-Poghosyan HY, Babayan LS, ve Ramachandran B (2017) Effects of orthodontic treatment with teeth extraction on soft tissue facial profile. New Armen Med J 11(3):62–66
23. Nambi N, Shrinivaasan NR, Dhayananth LX, Chajallani VG, George AM (2016) Renaissance in orthodontics: nanotechnology. Int J Orthodontic Rehabil 7(4):13910.4103/2349-5243.197461 ↗
24. Pair JW, Luke L, White S, Atchinson K, Englehart R, Brennan R (2001) Variability of study cast assessment among orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 120(6):629–63810.1067/mod.2001.119781 ↗
25. Sharma P, Arora A, Valiathan A (2014) Age changes of jaws and soft tissue profile. Sci World J 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/30150110.1155/2014/301501 ↗
26. Shah SH, Azeem M, Hamid WU, Rasool F (2018) Relationship between positive clinical VTO and post-treatment soft tissue profile following phase l growth modification therapy. Orthodontic J Nepal 8(2):45–4910.3126/ojn.v8i2.23071 ↗
27. Suh HY, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Donatelli RE, Wheeler TT, Kim SH et al (2012) A more accurate method of predicting soft tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(10):553–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.18710.1016/j.joms.2012.06.187 ↗
28. Tahmasbi S, Mohamadian F, Hosseini S, Eftekhar L (2019) A review on the applications of nanotechnology in orthodontics. Nanomed J 6(1):11–18
29. Taş E, Bilazer M, Şahin E, & Gürsel AO (2007) OBSTRÜKTİF UYKU APNE SENDROMLU HASTALARDA SEFALOMETRİK ANALİZ SONUÇLARI
30. Vural A (2018) İskeletsel sınıf III maloklüzyonlu ortognatik cerrahi hastalarında sefalometrik değişimlerin yaşam kalitesinin ve postoperatif memnuniyetin değerlendirilmesi. Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
31. Wisth PJ (2007) Changes of the soft tissue profile during growth. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 29:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl10410.1093/ejo/cjl104 ↗
32. Xuan J, Bing L, Li S-F, Ma Y-N, Kwon T-G, Wu X-P (2018) Morphological characteristics of soft tissue profile of angle’s class II division I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment. Int J Morphol 36(1):26–30. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-9502201800010002610.4067/s0717-95022018000100026 ↗