Transformation of zinc oxide nanoparticles in synthetic lung fluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Hwang DK et al (2003) Scratch resistant and transparent UV-protective coating on polycarbonate. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 26(1–3):783–78710.1023/A:1020774927773 ↗
2. Zhou S et al (2002) The change of the properties of acrylic-based polyurethane via addition of nano-silica. Prog Org Coat 45(1):33–4210.1016/S0300-9440(02)00085-1 ↗
3. Kaiser J-P, Zuin S, Wick P (2013) Is nanotechnology revolutionizing the paint and lacquer industry? A critical opinion. Sci Total Environ 442:282–28910.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.009 ↗
4. Cayton RH, Sawitowski T (2006) The impact of nano-materials on UV-protective coatings. Nanophase Technologies Corporation, Romeoville, IL, p 60446
5. Kaiser J-P et al (2013) Human health risk of ingested nanoparticles that are added as multifunctional agents to paints: an in vitro study. PLoS ONE 8(12):e8321510.1371/journal.pone.0083215 ↗
6. Lee J, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJJ (2010) Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 4(7):3580–359010.1021/nn100866w ↗
7. van Broekhuizen P et al (2011) Use of nanomaterials in the European construction industry and some occupational health aspects thereof. J Nanopart Res 13(2):447–46210.1007/s11051-010-0195-9 ↗
8. Yebra DM et al (2006) Dissolution rate measurements of sea water soluble pigments for antifouling paints: ZnO. Prog Org Coat 56(4):327–33710.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.06.007 ↗
9. El-Feky OM et al (2014) Use of ZnO nanoparticles for protecting oil paintings on paper support against dirt, fungal attack, and UV aging. J Cult Herit 15(2):165–17210.1016/j.culher.2013.01.012 ↗
10. Keller AA et al (2013) Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 15(6):169210.1007/s11051-013-1692-4 ↗
11. Al-Kattan A et al (2015) Characterization of materials released into water from paint containing nano-SiO2. Chemosphere 119:1314–132110.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.005 ↗
12. Al-Kattan A et al (2013) Release of TiO 2 from paints containing pigment-TiO 2 or nano-TiO 2 by weathering. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15(12):2186–219310.1039/c3em00331k ↗
13. Kaegi R et al (2010) Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. Environ Pollut 158(9):2900–290510.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.009 ↗
14. Kägi R et al (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156(2):233–23910.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.004 ↗
15. Shandilya N et al (2015) Emission of titanium dioxide nanoparticles from building materials to the environment by wear and weather. Environ Sci Technol 49(4):2163–217010.1021/es504710p ↗
16. Zuin S et al (2014) Leaching of nanoparticles from experimental water-borne paints under laboratory test conditions. J Nanopart Res 16(1):218510.1007/s11051-013-2185-1 ↗
17. Clar JG et al (2018) Dermal transfer and environmental release of CeO2 nanoparticles used as UV inhibitors on outdoor surfaces: Implications for human and environmental health. Sci Total Environ 613–614:714–72310.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.050 ↗
18. Mackevica A et al (2018) Dermal transfer quantification of nanoparticles from nano-enabled surfaces. NanoImpact 11:109–11810.1016/j.impact.2018.06.001 ↗
19. Platten WE III et al (2016) Estimating dermal transfer of copper particles from the surfaces of pressure-treated lumber and implications for exposure. Sci Total Environ 548:441–44910.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.108 ↗
20. Zuin S et al (2014) Leaching of nanoparticles from experimental water-borne paints under laboratory test conditions. J Nanoparticle Res 16(1):218510.1007/s11051-013-2185-1 ↗
21. Clar JG et al (2019) Transformation and release of nanoparticle additives & byproducts from commercially available surface coatings on pressure treated lumber via dermal contact. Sci Total Environ 694:13366910.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133669 ↗
22. Clar JG et al (2019) Reldease and transformation of ZnO nanoparticles used in outdoor surface coatings for UV protection. Sci Total Environ 670:78–8610.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.189 ↗
23. Morgeneyer M et al (2015) Use of a modified Taber abrasion apparatus for investigating the complete stress state during abrasion and in-process wear particle aerosol generation. Chem End Res Des 93:251–25610.1016/j.cherd.2014.04.029 ↗
24. Göhler D et al (2010) Characterization of nanoparticle release from surface coatings by the simulation of a sanding process. Ann Occup Hyg 54(6):615–62410.1093/annhyg/meq053 ↗
25. Wohlleben, W. and N.J.N. Neubauer, Quantitative rates of release from weathered nanocomposites are determined across 5 orders of magnitude by the matrix, modulated by the embedded nanomaterial. 2016. 1: p. 39-4510.1016/j.impact.2016.01.001 ↗
26. Lambourne, R. and T. Strivens, Paint and surface coatings: theory and practice. 1999: Elsevier.10.1533/9781855737006 ↗
27. Celebi, U.B. and N.J.A.E. Vardar, Investigation of VOC emissions from indoor and outdoor painting processes in shipyards. 2008. 42(22): p. 5685-569510.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.003 ↗
28. Cooper MR et al (2017) Inhalation exposure during spray application and subsequent sanding of a wood sealant containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Occup Environ Hyg 14(7):510–52210.1080/15459624.2017.1296237 ↗
29. Steiling W et al (2014) Principle considerations for the risk assessment of sprayed consumer products. Toxicol Lett 227(1):41–4910.1016/j.toxlet.2014.03.005 ↗
30. Adamcakova-Dodd A et al (2014) Toxicity assessment of zinc oxide nanoparticles using sub-acute and sub-chronic murine inhalation models. Part Fibre Toxicol 11(1):1510.1186/1743-8977-11-15 ↗
31. Areecheewakul S et al (2020) Toxicity assessment of metal oxide nanomaterials using in vitro screening and murine acute inhalation studies. NanoImpact 18:10021410.1016/j.impact.2020.100214 ↗
32. Cho W-S et al (2011) Progressive severe lung injury by zinc oxide nanoparticles; the role of Zn2+ dissolution inside lysosomes. Part Fibre Toxicol 8(1):2710.1186/1743-8977-8-27 ↗
33. Olejnik M et al (2021) Cell-biological effects of zinc oxide spheres and rods from the nano- to the microscale at sub-toxic levels. Cell Biol Toxicol 37(4):573–59310.1007/s10565-020-09571-z ↗
34. Hadrup N et al (2019) Acute phase response and inflammation following pulmonary exposure to low doses of zinc oxide nanoparticles in mice. Nanotoxicology 13(9):1275–129210.1080/17435390.2019.1654004 ↗
35. Larsen ST et al (2020) Acute inhalation toxicity after inhalation of ZnO nanoparticles: lung surfactant function inhibition in vitro correlates with reduced tidal volume in mice. Int J Toxicol 39(4):321–32710.1177/1091581820933146 ↗
36. Lin W et al (2009) Toxicity of nano- and micro-sized ZnO particles in human lung epithelial cells. J Nanopart Res 11(1):25–3910.1007/s11051-008-9419-7 ↗
37. Pouramjad SM et al (2009) Study of zinc serum concentration and effect of zinc supplementation on lung function in asthmatic patients. RJMS 15:55–61
38. Safai-Kutti S et al (1991) Zinc therapy in children with cystic fibrosis. Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie= Contributions to infusion therapy 27:104–114
39. Mayor-Ibarguren, A., C. Busca-Arenzana, and Á. Robles-Marhuenda, A Hypothesis for the possible role of zinc in the immunological pathways related to COVID-19 infection. Frontiers in Immunology, 2020. 11(1736)10.3389/fimmu.2020.01736 ↗
40. Surwade P et al (2020) Impact of the changes in bacterial outer membrane structure on the anti-bacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology 22:1–810.1007/s11051-020-4767-z ↗
41. Milosevic AM et al (2017) Assessing the stability of fluorescently encoded nanoparticles in lysosomes by using complementary methods. Angew Chem Int Ed 56(43):13382–1338610.1002/anie.201705422 ↗
42. MilosevicAc A et al (2019) Artificial Lysosomal platform to study nanoparticle long-term stability. Chimia (Aarau) 73(1):55–5810.2533/chimia.2019.55 ↗
43. Pelfrêne A et al (2017) In vitro investigations of human bioaccessibility from reference materials using simulated lung fluids. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(2):11210.3390/ijerph14020112 ↗
44. Boisa N et al (2014) Development and application of an inhalation bioaccessibility method (IBM) for lead in the PM10 size fraction of soil. Environ Int 70:132–14210.1016/j.envint.2014.05.021 ↗
45. Weggeberg, H., et al., Element analysis and bioaccessibility assessment of ultrafine airborne particulate matter (PM0.1) using simulated lung fluid extraction (artificial lysosomal fluid and Gamble's solution). Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, 2019. 1: p. 26-3510.1016/j.enceco.2019.08.001 ↗
46. Guney M et al (2017) Lung bioaccessibility of As, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn in fine fraction (< 20 μm) from contaminated soils and mine tailings. Sci Total Environ 579:378–38610.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.086 ↗
47. Favorito JE et al (2017) Selenium speciation in phosphate mine soils and evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure using XAFS. Environ Pollut 229:911–92110.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.071 ↗
48. Gräfe M et al (2014) Speciation of metal(loid)s in environmental samples by X-ray absorption spectroscopy: A critical review. Anal Chim Acta 822:1–2210.1016/j.aca.2014.02.044 ↗