Atomistic study of hardening mechanism in Al-Cu nanostructure
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanostructures have the immense potential to supplant the traditional metallic structure as they show enhanced mechanical properties through strain hardening. In this paper, the effect of grain sizes on the hardening mechanism of an Al-Cu nanostructure is elucidated by molecular dynamics simulation. The Al-Cu (50–54% Cu by weight) nanostructure having an average grain size of 4.57 to 7.26 nm are investigated for tensile simulation at different strain rates using embedded atom method (EAM) potential at a temperature of 50~500 K. It is found that the failure mechanism of the nanostructure is governed by the temperature, grain size, and strain rate applied. At the high temperature of 300–500 K, the failure strength of the Al-Cu nanostructure increases with the decrease of average grain size following Hall-Petch relation. Dislocation motions are hindered significantly when the grain size is decreased which play a vital role in the hardening of the nanostructure. The failure is always found to initiate at a particular Al grain due to its weak link and propagates through grain boundary (GB) sliding, diffusion, dislocation nucleation, and propagation. We also visualize the dislocation density at different grain sizes to show how the dislocation affects the material properties at the nanoscale. These results will further aid investigation on the deformation mechanism of other nanostructures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Bochicchio D, Ferrando R (2013) Morphological instability of core-shell metallic nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 87:165435. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.16543510.1103/PhysRevB.87.165435 ↗
2. Cao A, Wei Y, Ma E (2008) Grain boundary effects on plastic deformation and fracture mechanisms in Cu nanowires: molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 77:195429. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.19542910.1103/PhysRevB.77.195429 ↗
3. Carlton CE, Ferreira PJ (2007) What is behind the inverse Hall–Petch effect in nanocrystalline materials? Acta Mater 55:3749–3756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.02110.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.021 ↗
4. Chen M, Ma E, Hemker KJ, Sheng H, Wang Y, Cheng X (2003) Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline aluminum. Science 300:1275–1277. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108372710.1126/science.1083727 ↗
5. Conrad H, Narayan J (2000) On the grain size softening in nanocrystalline materials. Scr Mater 42:1025–103010.1016/S1359-6462(00)00320-1 ↗
6. D’Elia F, Ravindran C, Sediako D, Kainer KU, Hort N (2014) Hot tearing mechanisms of B206 aluminum–copper alloy. Mater Des 64:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.02410.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.024 ↗
7. Goodarzy MH, Arabi H, Boutorabi MA, Seyedein SH, Hasani Najafabadi SH (2014) The effects of room temperature ECAP and subsequent aging on mechanical properties of 2024 Al alloy. J Alloys Compd 585:753–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.20210.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.202 ↗
8. Hansen N (2004) Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scr Mater 51:801–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
9. Ito Y, Edalati K, Horita Z (2017) High-pressure torsion of aluminum with ultrahigh purity (99.9999%) and occurrence of inverse Hall-Petch relationship. Mater Sci Eng A 679:428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.06610.1016/j.msea.2016.10.066 ↗
10. Jia K, Fischer TE, Gallois B (1998) Microstructure, hardness and toughness of nanostructured and conventional WC-co composites. Nanostruct Mater 10:875–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9773(98)00123-810.1016/S0965-9773(98)00123-8 ↗
11. Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B 58:11085–11088. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
12. Lee W-S, Sue W-C, Lin C-F, Wu C-J (2000) The strain rate and temperature dependence of the dynamic impact properties of 7075 aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 100:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00465-310.1016/S0924-0136(99)00465-3 ↗
13. Li C, Wang Z, Wang P-I, Peles Y, Koratkar N, Peterson GP (2008a) Nanostructured copper interfaces for enhanced boiling. Small 4:1084–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20070099110.1002/smll.200700991 ↗
14. Li YS, Zhang Y, Tao NR, Lu K (2008b) Effect of thermal annealing on mechanical properties of a nanostructured copper prepared by means of dynamic plastic deformation. Scr Mater 59:475–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.04310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.043 ↗
15. Li X, Wei Y, Yang W, Gao H (2009a) Competing grain-boundary- and dislocation-mediated mechanisms in plastic strain recovery in nanocrystalline aluminum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16108–16113. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090176510610.1073/pnas.0901765106 ↗
16. Li Z, Hou C, Huang M, Ouyang C (2009b) Strengthening mechanism in micro-polycrystals with penetrable grain boundaries by discrete dislocation dynamics simulation and Hall–Petch effect. Comput Mater Sci 46:1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.02110.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.021 ↗
17. Liao XZ, Zhao YH, Zhu YT, Valiev RZ, Gunderov DV (2004) Grain-size effect on the deformation mechanisms of nanostructured copper processed by high-pressure torsion. J Appl Phys 96:636–640. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.175703510.1063/1.1757035 ↗
18. Liu X, Lan S, Ni J (2014) Analysis of process parameters effects on friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloy to advanced high strength steel. Mater Des 59:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.00310.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.003 ↗
19. Löffler JF, Meier JP, Doudin B, Ansermet JP, Wagner W (1998) Random and exchange anisotropy in consolidated nanostructured Fe and Ni: role of grain size and trace oxides on the magnetic properties. Phys Rev B 57:2915–2924. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.291510.1103/PhysRevB.57.2915 ↗
20. Mantisi B (2016) Generation of polycrystalline material at the atomic scale. Comput Mater Sci 118:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.03.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2016.03.002 ↗
21. McClain MJ, Schlather AE, Ringe E, et al (2015) Aluminum nanocrystals. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00614 . Accessed 25 Mar 201910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00614 ↗
22. Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 51:427–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
23. Mojumder S (2018) Molecular dynamics study of plasticity in Al-Cu alloy nanopillar due to compressive loading. Phys B Condens Matter 530:86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2017.10.11910.1016/j.physb.2017.10.119 ↗
24. Mojumder S, Amin AA, Islam MM (2015) Mechanical properties of stanene under uniaxial and biaxial loading: a molecular dynamics study. J Appl Phys 118:124305. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493157210.1063/1.4931572 ↗
25. Parvizi R, Marceau RKW, Hughes AE, et al (2014) Atom probe tomography study of the nanoscale heterostructure around an Al20Mn3Cu2 dispersoid in aluminum alloy 2024. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/la503418u . Accessed 25 Mar 201910.1021/la503418u ↗
26. Plimpton S (1995) Computational limits of classical molecular dynamics simulations. Comput Mater Sci 4:361–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(95)00037-110.1016/0927-0256(95)00037-1 ↗
27. Quek SS, Chooi ZH, Wu Z, Zhang YW, Srolovitz DJ (2016) The inverse Hall–Petch relation in nanocrystalline metals: a discrete dislocation dynamics analysis. J Mech Phys Solids 88:252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.12.01210.1016/j.jmps.2015.12.012 ↗
28. Rincón E, López HF, Cisneros MM, Mancha H, Cisneros MA (2007) Effect of temperature on the tensile properties of an as-cast aluminum alloy A319. Mater Sci Eng A 452–453:682–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.02910.1016/j.msea.2006.11.029 ↗
29. Rubilar O, Rai M, Tortella G, Diez MC, Seabra AB, Durán N (2013) Biogenic nanoparticles: copper, copper oxides, copper sulphides, complex copper nanostructures and their applications. Biotechnol Lett 35:1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1239-x10.1007/s10529-013-1239-x ↗
30. Sheng HW, Kramer MJ, Cadien A, Fujita T, Chen MW (2011) Highly optimized embedded-atom-method potentials for fourteen fcc metals. Phys Rev B 83:134118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.13411810.1103/PhysRevB.83.134118 ↗
31. Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
32. Takata N, Lee S-H, Tsuji N (2009) Ultrafine grained copper alloy sheets having both high strength and high electric conductivity. Mater Lett 63:1757–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.02110.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.021 ↗
33. Tan SJ, Zhang L, Zhu D, et al (2014) Plasmonic color palettes for photorealistic printing with aluminum nanostructures. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl501460x . Accessed 25 Mar 201910.1021/nl501460x ↗
34. Tellkamp VL, Lavernia EJ, Melmed A (2001) Mechanical behavior and microstructure of a thermally stable bulk nanostructured Al alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 32:2335–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0207-610.1007/s11661-001-0207-6 ↗
35. Valiev RZ, Murashkin MY, Sabirov I (2014) A nanostructural design to produce high-strength Al alloys with enhanced electrical conductivity. Scr Mater 76:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.002 ↗
36. Wang W, Zhang H, Tian C, Meng X (2015) Numerical experiments on evaporation and explosive boiling of ultra-thin liquid argon film on aluminum nanostructure substrate. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-0830-610.1186/s11671-015-0830-6 ↗
37. Wu ZX, Zhang YW, Jhon MH, Greer JR, Srolovitz DJ (2013) Nanostructure and surface effects on yield in cu nanowires. Acta Mater 61:1831–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.05310.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.053 ↗
38. Xu W, Dávila LP (2018) Tensile nanomechanics and the hall-Petch effect in nanocrystalline aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A 710:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.02110.1016/j.msea.2017.10.021 ↗
39. Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Mukherjee AK, Gleiter H (2002) Dislocation processes in the deformation of nanocrystalline aluminium by molecular-dynamics simulation. Nat Mater 1:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat70010.1038/nmat700 ↗
40. Zhao YH, Liao XZ, Cheng S, et al (2006) Simultaneously Increasing the Ductility and Strength of Nanostructured Alloys. Adv Mater 18:2280–2283. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060031010.1002/adma.200600310 ↗
41. Zhou K, Liu B, Shao S, Yao Y (2017) Molecular dynamics simulations of tension–compression asymmetry in nanocrystalline copper. Phys Lett A 381:1163–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.01.02710.1016/j.physleta.2017.01.027 ↗
42. Zhu YT, Liao X (2004) Nanostructured metals: Retaining ductility. Nat Mater 3:351–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat114110.1038/nmat1141 ↗
43. Ziegler KJ, Doty RC, Johnston KP and Korgel BA (2001) Synthesis of organic monolayer-stabilized copper nanocrystals in supercritical water. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja010824w . Accessed 25 Mar 201910.1021/ja010824w ↗