journal article·2016-12

nTiO2 mass transfer and deposition behavior in an aquatic environment

Xiuzhen Wei, Junhui He, Meng Wang, Jinfeng Fang, Jinyuan Chen, Bosheng Lv

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Nano-TiO2 (nTiO2) is widely used in industry, and some of it is inevitably released into natural aquatic environments. nTiO2 can be deposited on the streambed or transported along the stream and streambed, and it can also undergo exchange-transfer processes in these systems. The behavior of nTiO2 in rivers includes deposition-transfer processes in the stream and exchange-transfer processes between the stream and streambed. In this work, the deposition, mass transfer, exchange, and aggregation behavior of nTiO2 in a simulated river were studied as a function of the solution pH, stream velocity, and anionic, cationic, and neutral surfactant concentrations. In these experiments, a recirculating flume was used to simulate a natural stream. The nTiO2 deposition and aggregation phenomena in the river and streambed were characterized. Of the three surfactants studied, the anionic surfactant enhanced the nTiO2 stability in the river and limited its aggregation most effectively, resulting in slow nTiO2 deposition and nTiO2 transport over long distances. This study provides information about nanoparticle transport phenomena in simulated natural aquatic systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Water Treatment and Disinfection · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Areepitak T, Ren J (2011) Model simulations of particle aggregation effect on colloid exchange between streams and streambeds. Environ Sci Technol 45(13):5614–562110.1021/es200586v ↗
2. Bencala KE, Walters RA (1983) Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool-and-riffle stream: a transient storage model. Water Resour Res 19(3):718–72410.1029/WR019i003p00718 ↗
3. Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2007) Bedform-induced hyporheic exchange with unsteady flows. Adv Water Resour 30:148–15610.1016/j.advwatres.2006.03.004 ↗
4. Boncagni NT, Otaegui JM, Warner E, Curran T, Ren J, Cortalezzi M (2009) Exchange of TiO2 nanoparticles between streams and streambeds. Environ Sci Technol 43(20):7699–770510.1021/es900424n ↗
5. Bouchard D, Ma X, Isaacson C (2009) Colloidal properties of aqueous fullerenes: isoelectric points and aggregation kinetics of C60 and C60 derivatives. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6597–660310.1021/es901354r ↗
6. Brant J, Lecoanet H, Wiesner MR (2005) Aggregation and deposition characteristics of fullerene nanoparticles in aqueous systems. J Nanopart Res 7:545–55310.1007/s11051-005-4884-8 ↗
7. Cardenas MB, Wilson JL (2007) Hydrodynamics of coupled flow above and below a sediment-water interface with triangular bedforms. Adv Water Resour 30:30l–31310.1016/j.advwatres.2006.06.009 ↗
8. Chang X, Henderson WM, Bouchard DC (2015) Multiwalled carbon nanotube dispersion methods affect their aggregation, deposition, and biomarker response. Environ Sci Technol 49:6645–665310.1021/acs.est.5b00654 ↗
9. Chen KL, Elimelech M (2006) Aggregation and deposition kinetics of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Langmuir 22:10994–1100110.1021/la062072v ↗
10. Choy C, Wazne M, Meng X (2008) Application of an empirical transport model to simulate retention of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide in sand columns. Chemosphere 71:1794–180110.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.030 ↗
11. Dittrich TM, Boukhalfa H, Ware SD, Reimus PW (2015) Laboratory investigation of the role of desorption kinetics on americum transport associated with bentonite colloids. J Environ Radioactiv 148:170–18210.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.07.001 ↗
12. Elliott AH, Brooks NH (1997) Transfer of nonsorbing solutes to a steambed with forms: theory. Water Resour Res 33(1):123–13610.1029/96WR02784 ↗
13. Emory S, Nie S (1998) Screening and enrichment of metal nanoparticles with novel optical properties. J Phys Chem B 102:493–49710.1021/jp9734033 ↗
14. Farouk HU, Raman A, Daud WM (2016) TiO2 catalyst deactivation in textile wastewater treatment: current challenges and future advances. J Ind Eng Chem 33:11–2110.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.022 ↗
15. Flory J, Kanel SR, Racz L, Impellitteri CA, Silva RG, Goltz MN (2013) Influence of pH on the transport of silver nanoparticles in saturated porous media: laboratory experiments and modeling. J Nanopart Res doi. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1484-x10.1007/s11051-013-1484-x ↗
16. Gao J, Youn S, Hovsepyan A, Llaneza VL, Wang Y, Bitton G, Bonzongo J (2009) Dispersion and toxicity of selected manufactured nanomaterials in natural river water samples: effects of water chemical composition. Environ Sci Technol 43:3322–332810.1021/es803315v ↗
17. Ghanbarian B, Taslimitehrani V, Dong G, Pachepsky YA (2015) Sample dimensions effect on prediction of soil water retention curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity. J Hydrol 528:127–13710.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.024 ↗
18. Godinez IG, Darnault C (2011) Aggregation and transport of nano-TiO2 in saturated porous media: effects of pH, surfactants and flow velocity. Water Res 45:839–85110.1016/j.watres.2010.09.013 ↗
19. Guzman K, Finnegan MP, Banfield JF (2006) Influence of surface potential on aggregation and transport of titania nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 40:7688–769310.1021/es060847g ↗
20. Hendren CO, Lowry GV, Unrine JM, Wiesner MR (2015) A functional assay-based strategy for nanomaterial risk forecasting. Sci Total Environ 536:1029–103710.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.100 ↗
21. Idena SC, Peters A, Durner W (2015) Improving prediction of hydraulic conductivity by constraining capillary bundle models to a maximum pore size. Adv Water Resour 85:86–9210.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.005 ↗
22. Indris S, Amade R, Heitjans P, Finger M, Haeger A, Hesse D, Grünert W, Börger A, Becker KD (2005) Preparation by high-energy milling, characterization, and catalytic properties of nanocrystalline TiO2. J Phys Chem B 109(49):23274–2327810.1021/jp054586t ↗
23. Jung J, Gidaspow D (2002) Fluidization of nano-size particles. J Nanopart Res 4:483–49710.1023/A:1022807918247 ↗
24. Kandlikar M, Ramachandran G, Maynard A, Murdock B, Toscano WA (2007) Health risk assessment for nanoparticales: a case for using expert judgment. J Nanopart Res 9:137–15610.1007/s11051-006-9154-x ↗
25. Kang J, Yi I, Park J, Kim S, Kim H, Han Y et al (2015) Transport of carboxyl-functionalized carbon black nanoparticles in saturated porous media: column experiments and model analyses. J Contam Hydrol 177-178:194–20510.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.04.009 ↗
26. Kelkar A, Franses E, Corti D (2014) Nonideal diffusion effects and short-range ordering lead to higher aggregation rates in concentrated hard-sphere dispersions. Langmuir 30:3647–365710.1021/la500176t ↗
27. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, Mclaughlin MJ, Lead JR (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(9):1825–185110.1897/08-090.1 ↗
28. Kreyling WG, Semmler-Behnke M, Möller W (2006) Health implications of nanoparticales. J Nanopart Res 8:534–56210.1007/s11051-005-9068-z ↗
29. Li X, Lenhart J, Walker HW (2010a) Dissolution-accompanied aggregation kinetics of silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 26(22):16690–1669810.1021/la101768n ↗
30. Li YV, Cathles LM, Archer LA (2014b) Nanoparticle tracers in calcium carbonate porous media. J Nanopart Res 16:2541. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2541-910.1007/s11051-014-2541-9 ↗
31. Lin D, Liu N, Yang K, Zhu L, Xu Y, Xing B (2009) The effect of ionic strength and pH on the stability of tannic acid-facilitated carbon nanotube suspensions. Carbon 47(12):2875–288210.1016/j.carbon.2009.06.036 ↗
32. Ma X, Bouchard D (2009) Formation of aqueous suspensions of fullerenes. Environ Sci Technol 43(2):330–33610.1021/es801833p ↗
33. Mehrjouei M, Muller S, Möller D (2015) A review on hotocatalytic ozonation used for the treatment of water and wastewater. Chem Eng J 263:209–21910.1016/j.cej.2014.10.112 ↗
34. Packman AI, Brooks NH, Morgan J (1997b) Experimental techniques for laboratory investigation of clay colloid transport and filtration in a stream with a sand bed. Water Air Soil Poll 99(1–4):113–122
35. Packman AI, Brooks NH, Morgan J (2000a) A physicochemical model for colloid exchange between a stream and a sand streambed with bed forms. Water Resour Res 36(8):2351–236110.1029/2000WR900059 ↗
36. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N (2010) Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44:6532–654910.1021/es100598h ↗
37. Ren J, Packman AI (2004) Stream-subsurface exchange of zinc in the presence of silica and kaolinite colloids. Environ Sci Technol 38(24):6571–658110.1021/es035090x ↗
38. Ren J, Packman AI (2005) Coupled stream-subsurface exchange of colloidal hematite and dissolved zinc, copper and phosphate. Environ Sci Technol 39(17):6387–639410.1021/es050168q ↗
39. Saif M, Aboul-Fotouh S, EI-Molla S, Ibrahim M, Ismail L (2012) Improvement of the structural, morphology, and optical properties of TiO2 for solar treatment of industrial wastewater. J Nanopart Res 14:1227. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1227-410.1007/s11051-012-1227-4 ↗
40. Salant NL (2011) ‘Sticky business’: the influence of streambed periphyton on particle deposition and infiltration. Geomorphology 126:350–36310.1016/j.geomorph.2010.08.015 ↗
41. Thio B, Zhou D, Keller A (2011) Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 189:556–56310.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.072 ↗
42. Tian Y, Gao B, Silvera-Batista C, Ziegler KJ (2010) Transport of engineered nanoparticles in saturated porous media. J Nanopart Res 12(7):2371–238010.1007/s11051-010-9912-7 ↗
43. Tiraferri A, Sethi R (2009) Enhanced transport of zerovalent iron nanoparticles in saturated porous media by guar gum. J Nanopart Res 11(3):635–64510.1007/s11051-008-9405-0 ↗
44. Tsai CW, Man C, Oh J (2014) Stochastic particle based models for suspended particle movement in surface flow. Int J Sediment Res 29:195–20710.1016/S1001-6279(14)60036-6 ↗
45. Tufenkji N, Elimelech M (2004) Correlation equation for predicting single-collector efficiency in physicochemical filtration in saturated porous media. Environ Sci Technol 38(2):529–53610.1021/es034049r ↗
46. Vale SS, Fuller IC, Procter JN, Basher LR, Smith IE (2016) Characterization and quantification of suspended sediment sources to the Manawatu River, New Zealand. Sci Total Environ 543:171–18610.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.003 ↗
47. Veronovski N, Andreozzi P, Mesa CL, Sfiligoj-Smole M, Ribitsch V (2010) Use of Gemini surfactants to stabilize TiO2 P25 colloidal dispersions. Colloid Polym Sci 288:387–39410.1007/s00396-009-2133-x ↗
48. Yang K, Yi Z, Jing Q, Lin D (2014) Dispersion and aggregation of single-walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions of anionic surfactants. Appl Phys Eng 8:624–633
49. Yao K, Habibian MT, O’Melia CR (1971) Water and waste water filtration: concepts and applications. Environ Sci Technol 5(11):1105–111210.1021/es60058a005 ↗