Two-dimensional superlattice-like sheets of superparamagnetic graphene oxide/magnetic nanoparticle hybrids
Source abstract
Abstract
Using a simple and facile method, we precisely controlled the two-dimensional layered array structure of graphene oxide (GO)–iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticle hybrid multilayer films and investigated the correlation between the assembled structure of the hybrid films and their magnetic properties. GO–Fe3O4 nanoparticle hybrids were obtained via the ligand exchange of oleic acid-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles with GO at the gas–liquid interface. Hybrids of oriented Fe3O4 nanoparticles and GO monolayers spontaneously formed at the gas–liquid interface, which were subsequently deposited on solid substrates using the Langmuir–Schaefer (LS) technique. Two-dimensional superlattices of GO–Fe3O4 nanoparticle hybrids were fabricated through repeated LS deposition of the nanoparticle monolayer with a hexagonal array structure sandwiched between GO monolayers. The magnetic properties of the GO–Fe3O4 multilayer were measured using SQUID magnetometry. From the field cooling/zero field cooling results, we found that the 2D superlattice-like layered structure of the GO–Fe3O4 multilayer facilitates the layer-dependent properties in the out-of-plane field case due to the dipolar interactions between the top and bottom layers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Branquinho LC, Carrião MS, Costa AS, Zufelato N, Sousa MH, Miotto R, Ivkov R, Bakuzis AF (2013) Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: Implications for cancer hyperthermia. Sci Rep 3:2887. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0288710.1038/srep02887 ↗
2. Bruvera I, Mendoza Zélis P, Pilar Calatayud M, Goya GF, Sánchez FH (2015) Determination of the blocking temperature of magnetic nanoparticles: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Appl Phys 118:184304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493548410.1063/1.4935484 ↗
3. Chen W, Yi P, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Deng Z, Zhang Z (2011) Composites of aminodextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and graphene oxide for cellular magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:4085–4091. https://doi.org/10.1021/am200964710.1021/am2009647 ↗
4. Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhang H-B, Li X, Gui C-X, Yu Z-Z (2015) Enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding efficiency of polystyrene/graphene composites with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Carbon 82:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.03110.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.031 ↗
5. Chomoucka J, Drbohlavova J, Huska D, Adam V, Kizek R, Hubalek J (2010) Magnetic nanoparticles and targeted drug delivering. Pharmacol Res 62:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.01.01410.1016/j.phrs.2010.01.014 ↗
6. Choo ESG, Tang X, Sheng Y, Shuter B, Xue J (2011) Controlled loading of superparamagnetic nanoparticles in fluorescent nanogels as effective T 2-weighted MRI contrast agents. J Mater Chem 21:2310–2319. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm03232h10.1039/c0jm03232h ↗
7. Cong HP, He JJ, Lu Y, Yu SH (2010) Water-soluble magnetic-functionalized reduced graphene oxide sheets: in situ synthesis and magnetic resonance imaging applications. Small 6:169–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20090136010.1002/smll.200901360 ↗
8. Dilnawaz F, Singh A, Mohanty C, Sahoo SK (2010) Dual drug loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. Biomaterials 31:3694–3706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.057 ↗
9. Fan X, Jiao G, Zhao W, Jin P, Li X (2013) Magnetic Fe 3 O 4–graphene composites as targeted drug nanocarriers for pH-activated release. Nanoscale 5:1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR33158F10.1039/C2NR33158F ↗
10. Frey NA, Peng S, Cheng K, Sun S (2009) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, functionalization, and applications in bioimaging and magnetic energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 38:2532–2542. https://doi.org/10.1039/b815548h10.1039/b815548h ↗
11. Gupta MN, Kaloti M, Kapoor M, Solanki K (2011) Nanomaterials as matrices for enzyme immobilization. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 39:98–109. https://doi.org/10.3109/10731199.2010.51625910.3109/10731199.2010.516259 ↗
12. Hayashi K, Nakamura M, Sakamoto W, Yogo T, Miki H, Ozaki S, Abe M, Matsumoto T, Ishimura K (2013) Superparamagnetic nanoparticle clusters for cancer theranostics combining magnetic resonance imaging and hyperthermia treatment. Theranostics 3:366–376. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.586010.7150/thno.5860 ↗
13. Hiroi K, Komatsu K, Sato T (2011) Superspin glass originating from dipolar interaction with controlled interparticle distance among γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles with silica shells. Phys Rev B 83:224423. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.22442310.1103/PhysRevB.83.224423 ↗
14. Khoshnevisan K, Bordbar A-K, Zare D, Davoodi D, Noruzi M, Barkhi M, Tabatabaei M (2011) Immobilization of cellulase enzyme on superparamagnetic nanoparticles and determination of its activity and stability. Chem Eng J 171:669–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.03910.1016/j.cej.2011.04.039 ↗
15. Kim H et al (2014) Morphology control of surfactant-assisted graphene oxide films at the liquid–gas interface. Langmuir 30:2170–2177. https://doi.org/10.1021/la403255q10.1021/la403255q ↗
16. Koo J et al (2016) Controlling the magnetic properties of polymer–iron oxide nanoparticle composite thin films via spatial particle orientation. RSC Adv 6:55842–55847. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra10026k10.1039/c6ra10026k ↗
17. Laurent S, Dutz S, Häfeli UO, Mahmoudi M (2011) Magnetic fluid hyperthermia: focus on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 166:8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.04.00310.1016/j.cis.2011.04.003 ↗
18. Laurent S, Saei AA, Behzadi S, Panahifar A, Mahmoudi M (2014) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for delivery of therapeutic agents: opportunities and challenges. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 11:1449–1470. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.92450110.1517/17425247.2014.924501 ↗
19. Li L, Jiang W, Luo K, Song H, Lan F, Wu Y, Gu Z (2013) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents for non-invasive stem cell labeling and tracking. Theranostics 3:595–615. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.536610.7150/thno.5366 ↗
20. Ma X et al (2012) A functionalized graphene oxide-iron oxide nanocomposite for magnetically targeted drug delivery, photothermal therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging. Nano Res 5:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-012-0200-y10.1007/s12274-012-0200-y ↗
21. Mitchell E, Gupta RK, Mensah-Darkwa K, Kumar D, Ramasamy K, Gupta BK, Kahol P (2014) Facile synthesis and morphogenesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for high-performance supercapacitor applications. New J Chem 38:4344–4350. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj00741g10.1039/c4nj00741g ↗
22. Mody VV, Cox A, Shah S, Singh A, Bevins W, Parihar H (2014) Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery systems for targeting tumor. Appl Nanosci 4:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-013-0216-y10.1007/s13204-013-0216-y ↗
23. Mural PKS, Pawar SP, Jayanthi S, Madras G, Sood AK, Bose S (2015) Engineering nanostructures by decorating magnetic nanoparticles onto graphene oxide sheets to shield electromagnetic radiations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:16266–16278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0270310.1021/acsami.5b02703 ↗
24. Núnez AS, Duine R, Haney P, MacDonald AH (2006) Theory of spin torques and giant magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic metals. Phys Rev B 73:214426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.21442610.1103/PhysRevB.73.214426 ↗
25. Patra S, Roy E, Karfa P, Kumar S, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2015) Dual-responsive polymer coated superparamagnetic nanoparticle for targeted drug delivery and hyperthermia treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:9235–9246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0178610.1021/acsami.5b01786 ↗
26. Pichon BP, Louet P, Felix O, Drillon M, Begin-Colin S, Decher G (2011) Magnetotunable hybrid films of stratified iron oxide nanoparticles assembled by the layer-by-layer technique. Chem Mater 23:3668–3675. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm201139s10.1021/cm201139s ↗
27. Qiao R, Yang C, Gao M (2009) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: from preparations to in vivo MRI applications. J Mater Chem 19:6274–6293. https://doi.org/10.1039/B902394A10.1039/B902394A ↗
28. Sedlmeier A, Gorris HHJCSR (2015) Surface modification and characterization of photon-upconverting nanoparticles for bioanalytical applications. Chem Soc Rev 44:1526–1560. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00186A10.1039/C4CS00186A ↗
29. Shen B, Zhai W, Tao M, Ling J, Zheng W (2013) Lightweight, multifunctional polyetherimide/graphene@ Fe3O4 composite foams for shielding of electromagnetic pollution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:11383–11391. https://doi.org/10.1021/am403652710.1021/am4036527 ↗
30. Singh AP et al (2012) Phenolic resin-based composite sheets filled with mixtures of reduced graphene oxide, γ-Fe2O3 and carbon fibers for excellent electromagnetic interference shielding in the X-band. Carbon 50:3868–3875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.03010.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.030 ↗
31. Singh AK, Kumar A, Haldar KK, Gupta V, Singh K (2018) Lightweight reduced graphene oxide-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite in the quest for an excellent electromagnetic interference shielding material. Nanotechnology 29:245203. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aab87a10.1088/1361-6528/aab87a ↗
32. Varón M, Beleggia M, Kasama T, Harrison R, Dunin-Borkowski RE, Puntes VF, Frandsen C (2013) Dipolar magnetism in ordered and disordered low-dimensional nanoparticle assemblies. Sci Rep 3:1234. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0123410.1038/srep01234 ↗
33. Venkatesha N, Poojar P, Qurishi Y, Geethanath S, Srivastava C (2015) Graphene oxide-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite with high transverse proton relaxivity value for magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Phys 117:154702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.491860510.1063/1.4918605 ↗
34. Wang Y, Huang R, Liang G, Zhang Z, Zhang P, Yu S, Kong J (2014) MRI-visualized, dual-targeting, combined tumor therapy using magnetic graphene-based mesoporous silica. Small 10:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20130129710.1002/smll.201301297 ↗
35. Wang G, Ma Y, Wei Z, Qi M (2016) Development of multifunctional cobalt ferrite/graphene oxide nanocomposites for magnetic resonance imaging and controlled drug delivery. Chem Eng J 289:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.07210.1016/j.cej.2015.12.072 ↗
36. Xie G, Xi P, Liu H, Chen F, Huang L, Shi Y, Hou F, Zeng Z, Shao C, Wang J (2012) A facile chemical method to produce superparamagnetic graphene oxide–Fe 3 O 4 hybrid composite and its application in the removal of dyes from aqueous solution. J Mater Chem 22:1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM13433G10.1039/C1JM13433G ↗
37. Yang X, Zhang X, Ma Y, Huang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y (2009) Superparamagnetic graphene oxide–Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles hybrid for controlled targeted drug carriers. J Mater Chem 19:2710–2714. https://doi.org/10.1039/B821416F10.1039/B821416F ↗
38. Yang K et al (2012) Multimodal imaging guided photothermal therapy using functionalized graphene nanosheets anchored with magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Mater 24:1868–1872. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110496410.1002/adma.201104964 ↗