The influence of the pore structure on the SO2 tolerance for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over MnOx-TiO2/MWCNTs catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
The MnOx-TiO2/MWCNTs nanocomposites were used as De-NOx catalysts to study the deep-rooted reason for the deactivation. Based on a series of characterization on as-prepared catalyst and poisoned catalyst, the results showed that the chief culprit for the deactivation is the micropores in the De-NOx catalyst. The formed ammonium (bi)sulfate in the micropores during the SCR reaction process could not be took away by the gas flow soon and then deposited on the catalyst surface gradually, and further covered the active sites. And the poisoned catalysts could be recovered partly rather than fully by heat treatment at 500 °C because of the decomposition of the ammonium (bi)sulfate and the phase transition of the TiO2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Cai SX, Hu H, Li HR, Shi LY, Zhang DS (2016) Design of multi-shell Fe2O3@MnOx@CNTs for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3: improvement of catalytic and SO2 tolerence. Nanoscale 8:3588–3598. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR08701E10.1039/C5NR08701E ↗
2. Gan LN, Li KZ, Xiong SC, Zhang Y, Chen J, Peng Y, Li J (2018) MnOx-CeO2 catalysts for effective NOx reduction in the presence of chlorobenzene. Catal Commun 117:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2018.08.00810.1016/j.catcom.2018.08.008 ↗
3. Gao C, Shi JW, Fan ZY, Gao G, Niu CM (2018) Sulfur and water resistance of Mn-based catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx: a review. Catalysts 8:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal801001110.3390/catal8010011 ↗
4. Izumi F (1978) The polymorphic crystallization of titanium (IV) oxide under hydrothermal conditions. II. The roles of inorganic anions in the nucleation of rutile and anatase from acid solutions. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 51:1771–1776. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.51.177110.1246/bcsj.51.1771 ↗
5. Jangjou Y, Wang D, Kumar A, Li JH, Epling WS (2016) SO2 poisoning of the NH3-SCR reaction over Cu-SAPO-34:effect of ammonium sulfate versus other S-containing species. ACS Catal 6:6612–6622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b0165610.1021/acscatal.6b01656 ↗
6. Jiang BQ, Liu Y, Wu ZB (2009) Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO on MnOx/TiO2 prepared by different methods. J Hazard Mater 162:1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.01310.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.013 ↗
7. Krishnan AT, Boehman AL (1998) Selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia at low temperatures. Appl Catal B Environ 18:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(98)00036-810.1016/S0926-3373(98)00036-8 ↗
8. Kusakabe K, Kashima M, Morooka S, Kato Y (1988) Rate of reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia on coke catalysts activated with sulphuric acid. Fuel 67:714–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(88)90304-310.1016/0016-2361(88)90304-3 ↗
9. Kusakabe K, Kawamura H, Kim HJ, Morooka S (1990) Effect of SO2 on coke catalyzed reduction of NO by ammonia. Fuel 69:917–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(90)90242-I10.1016/0016-2361(90)90242-I ↗
10. Li CL, Tang XL, Yi HH, Wang LF, Cui XX, Chu C, Li JY, Zhang RC, Yu QJ (2018) Rational design of template-free MnOx-CeO2 hollow nanotube as de-NOx catalyst at low temperature. Appl Surf Sci 428:924–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.13110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.131 ↗
11. Liu C, Shi JW, Gao C, Niu CM (2016) Manganese oxide-based catalysts for low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3: a review. Appl Catal Gen 522:54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.04.02310.1016/j.apcata.2016.04.023 ↗
12. Matsuda S, Kamo T, Kato A, Nakajima F (1981) Deposition of ammonium bisulfate in the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21:48–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/i300005a00910.1021/i300005a009 ↗
13. Meng DM, Zhan WC, Guo Y, Guo YL, Wang L, Lu GZ (2015) A highly effective catalyst of Sm-MnOx for the NH3-SCR of NOx at low temperature: promotional role of Sm and its catalytic performance. ACS Catal 5:5973–5983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b0074710.1021/acscatal.5b00747 ↗
14. Smirniotis PG, Peña DA, Uphade BS (2001) Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3 by using Mn, Cr, and Cu oxides supported on Hombikat TiO2. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng 40:2479–2482. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010702)40:13<2479::AID-ANIE2479>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/1521-3773(20010702)40:13<2479::AID-ANIE2479>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
15. Xie C, Yang SH, Li BB, Wang HK, Shi JW, Li GD, Niu CM (2016) C-doped mesoporous anatase TiO2 comprising 10 nm crystallites. J Colloid Interface Sci 476:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.08010.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.080 ↗
16. Xie C, Yang SH, Shi JW, Li BB, Gao C, Niu CM (2017) MnOx-TiO2 and Sn doped MnOx-TiO2 selective reduction catalysts prepared using MWCNTs as the pore template. Chem Eng J 327:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.07910.1016/j.cej.2017.06.079 ↗
17. Yan LJ, Liu YY, Zha KW, Li HR, Shi LY, Zhang DS (2017) Scale–activity relationship of MnOx-FeOy nanocage catalysts derived from Prussian blue analogues for low-temperature NO Reduction: Experimental and DFT Studies. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:2581−2593. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1552710.1021/acsami.6b15527 ↗
18. Zha KW, Cai SX, Hu H, Li HR, Yan TT, Shi LY, Zhang DS (2017) In situ DRIFTs investigation of promotional effects of tungsten on MnOx-CeO2/meso-TiO2 catalysts for NOx reduction. J Phys Chem C 121:25243–25254. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0860010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08600 ↗
19. Zha KW, Kang L, Feng C, Han LP, Li HR, Yan TT, Maitarad P, Shi LY, Zhang DS (2018) Improved NOx reduction in the presence of alkali metals by using hollandite Mn–Ti oxide promoted Cu-SAPO-34 catalysts. Environ Sci: Nano 5:1408–1419. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN00226F10.1039/C8EN00226F ↗