Atomic hydrogen and oxygen adsorptions in single-walled zigzag silicon nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Ab initio calculations have been performed to study the electronic and geometric structure properties of zigzag silicon nanotubes. Full geometry and spin optimizations have been performed without any symmetry constraints with an all electron 3-21G* basis set and the B3LYP hybrid functional. The largest zigzag SiNT studied here, (12, 0), has a binding energy per atom of 3.584 eV. Atomic hydrogen and oxygen adsorptions on (9, 0) and (10, 0) nanotubes have also been studied by optimizing the distances of the adatoms from both inside and outside the tube. The adatom is initially placed in four adsorption sites-parallel bridge (PB), zigzag bridge (ZB), hollow, and on-top site. The on-top site is the most preferred site for hydrogen atom adsorbed on (9, 0), with an adsorption energy of 3.0 eV and an optimized distance of 1.49 A from the adatom to the nearest silicon atom. For oxygen adsorption on (9, 0), the most preferred site is the ZB site, with an adsorption energy of 5.987 eV and an optimized distance of 1.72 A. For atomic hydrogen adsorption on (10, 0), the most preferred site is also the on-top site with an adsorption energy of 3.174 eV and an optimized distance of 1.49 A. For adsorption of atomic oxygen on (10, 0), the most preferred site is PB site, with an adsorption energy of 6.306 eV and an optimized distance of 1.71 A. The HOMO–LUMO gaps of (9, 0) after adsorptions of hydrogen and oxygen atoms decrease while the HOMO–LUMO gaps of (10, 0) increase after adsorption of hydrogen and oxygen.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Graphene research and applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Adhikari K, Ray AK (2011) On the existence and stability of double-walled armchair silicon carbide nanotubes. Solid State Commun 151:430–435. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2011.01.00410.1016/j.ssc.2011.01.004 ↗
2. Adhikari K, Ray AK (2012) Stability of silicon carbide nanocones: a nanocluster-based study. J Nanopart Res 14:816–829. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-0816-610.1007/s11051-012-0816-6 ↗
3. Alam K, Ray AK (2008) Hybrid density functional study of armchair SiC nanotubes. Phys Rev B 77:035436–035445. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.03543610.1103/PhysRevB.77.035436 ↗
4. An W, Wu X, Yang JL, Zeng XC (2007) Adsorption and surface reactivity on single-walled boron nitride nanotubes containing Stone–Wales defects. J Phys Chem C 111:14105–14112. doi: 10.1021/jp072443w10.1021/jp072443w ↗
5. Baierle RJ, Fagan SB, Mota R, da Silva AJR, Fazzio A (2001) Electronic and structural properties of silicon-doped carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 64:085413–085416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.08541310.1103/PhysRevB.64.085413 ↗
6. Banerjee S, Nigam S, Pillai CGS, Majumder C (2012) Hydrogen storage on Ti decorated SiC nanostructures: a first principles study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:3710–3733. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.07810.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.078 ↗
7. Bauschlicher CW (1995) A comparison of the accuracy of different functionals. Chem Phys Lett 246:40–44. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)01089-R10.1016/0009-2614(95)01089-R ↗
8. Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652. doi: 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
9. Becke AD (1998) A new inhomogeneity parameter in density-functional theory. J Chem Phys 109:2092–2098. doi: 10.1063/1.47672210.1063/1.476722 ↗
10. Bradley K, Jhi SH, Collins PG, Hone J, Cohen ML, Louie SG, Zettl A (2000) Is the intrinsic thermoelectric power of carbon nanotubes positive? Phys Rev Lett 85:4361–4364. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.436110.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4361 ↗
11. Ceperley DM, Alder BJ (1980) Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method. Phys Rev Lett 45:566–569. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
12. Chen H, Adhikari K, Ray AK (2012) An ab initio study of atomic hydrogen and oxygen adsorptions on armchair silicon nanotubes. J Comput Theor Nanosci 9:495–504. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2012.205110.1166/jctn.2012.2051 ↗
13. Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M, Zettl A (2000) Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. Science 287:1801–1804. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5459.180110.1126/science.287.5459.1801 ↗
14. Cumings J, Zettl A (2000) Mass-production of boron nitride double-wall nanotubes and nanococoons. Chem Phys Lett 316:211–216. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01277-410.1016/S0009-2614(99)01277-4 ↗
15. De Crescenzi M, Castrucci P, Scarselli M, Diociaiuti M, Chaudhari PS, Balasubramanian C, Bhave TM, Bhoraskar SV (2005) Experimental imaging of silicon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 86:231901–231903. doi: 10.1063/1.194349710.1063/1.1943497 ↗
16. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P (2001) Carbon nanotubes-synthesis, structure, properties and applications, topics in applied physics. Springer, Berlin
17. Frisch M et al (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CR
18. Goldberger J, He R, Zhang Y, Lee S, Yan H, Choi H, Yang P (2003) Single-crystal gallium nitride nanotubes. Nature 422:599–602. doi: 10.1038/nature0155110.1038/nature01551 ↗
19. Gulseren O, Yildirim T, Ciraci S (2002) Systematic ab initio study of curvature effects in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 65:153405–153408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.15340510.1103/PhysRevB.65.153405 ↗
20. Hamada N, Sawada SI, Oshiyama A (1992) New one-dimensional conductors: graphitic microtubules. Phys Rev Lett 68:1579–1581. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.157910.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1579 ↗
21. Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer Pvon R, Pople JA (1986) Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, New York
22. Heyd J, Scuseria GE (2004) Efficient hybrid density functional calculations in solids: assessment of the Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof screened Coulomb hybrid functional. J Chem Phys 121:1187–1192. doi: 10.1063/1.176007410.1063/1.1760074 ↗
23. Hohenberg P, Kohn W (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 136:B864–B871. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
24. Hu J, Ouyang M, Yang P, Lieber CM (1999) Controlled growth and electrical properties of heterojunctions of carbon nanotubes and silicon nanowires. Nature 399:48–51. doi: 10.1038/1994110.1038/19941 ↗
25. Huda MN, Kleinman L, Ray AK (2007) Silicon-carbide nanostructures to nanotubes. J Comput Theor Nanosci 4:739–744. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2007.00310.1166/jctn.2007.2360 ↗
26. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58. doi: 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
27. Jeong SY, Kim JY, Yang HD, Yoon BN, Choi S, Kang HK, Yang CW, Lee YH (2003) Synthesis of silicon nanotubes on porous alumina using molecular beam epitaxy. Adv Mater 15:1172–1176. doi: 10.1002/adma.20030489810.1002/adma.200304898 ↗
28. Jishi RA, Bragin J, Lou L (1999) Electronic structure of short and long carbon nanotubes from first principles. Phys Rev B 59:9862–9865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.986210.1103/PhysRevB.59.9862 ↗
29. Kohn W, Sham LJ (1965) Self-consistant equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 140:A1133–A1138. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
30. Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chapline MG, Peng S, Cho K, Dai H (2000) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287:622–625. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5453.62210.1126/science.287.5453.622 ↗
31. Landman U, Barnett RN, Scherbakov AG, Avouris P (2000) Metal-semiconductor nanocontacts: silicon nanowires. Phys Rev Lett 85:1958–1961. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.195810.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1958 ↗
32. Li C, Liu Z, Gu C, Xu X, Yang Y (2006) Controllable synthesis and growth model of amorphous silicon nanotubes with periodically dome-shaped interiors. Adv Mater 18:228–234. doi: 10.1002/adma.20050020210.1002/adma.200500202 ↗
33. Marsen B, Sattler K (1999) Fullerene-structured nanowires of silicon. Phys Rev B 60:11593–11600. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1159310.1103/PhysRevB.60.11593 ↗
34. Menon M, Richter E (1999) Are quasi-one dimensional structures of Si stable? Phys Rev Lett 83:792–795. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.79210.1103/PhysRevLett.83.792 ↗
35. Mestechkin MM (2006) Spin magnetism of finite length zigzag carbon nanotubes. Phys B 382:305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2006.03.00410.1016/j.physb.2006.03.004 ↗
36. Muscat J, Wander A, Harrison N (2001) On the prediction of band gaps from hybrid functional theory. Chem Phys Lett 342:397–401. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00616-910.1016/S0009-2614(01)00616-9 ↗
37. Nakada K, Fujita M (1996) Edge state in graphene ribbons: nanometer size effect and edge shape dependence. Phys Rev B 54:17954–17961. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1795410.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954 ↗
38. Niimi Y, Matsui T, Kambara H, Tagami K, Tsukada M, Fukuyama H (2006) Scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy of the electronic local density of states of graphite surfaces near monoatomic step edges. Phys Rev B 73:085421. doi: 10.1130/PhysRevB.73.08542110.1103/PhysRevB.73.085421 ↗
39. Odom TW, Huang JL, Kim P, Lieber CM (1998) Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 391:62–64. doi: 10.1038/3414510.1038/34145 ↗
40. Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford University Press, New York
41. Perdew JP, Levy M (1983) Physical content of the exact Kohn–Sham orbital energies: band gaps and derivative discontinuities. Phys Rev Lett 51:1884–1887. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.188410.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1884 ↗
42. Perdew JP, Parr RG, Levy M, Balduz JL (1982) Density-functional theory for fractional particle number: derivative discontinuities of the energy. Phys Rev Lett 49:1691–1694. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.169110.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1691 ↗
43. Pradhan P, Ray AK (2006) A hybrid density functional study of armchair Si and Ge nanotubes. J Comput Theor Nanosci 3:128–133. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2006.011
44. Rathi S, Ray AK (2008) On the electronic and geometric structures of armchair GeC nanotubes: a hybrid density functional study. Nanotech 19:335706–335716. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/33/33570610.1088/0957-4484/19/33/335706 ↗
45. Saito R, Fujita M, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS (1992) Electronic structure of chiral graphene tubules. Appl Phys Lett 60:2204–2206. doi: 10.1063/1.10708010.1063/1.107080 ↗
46. Sha J, Niu J, Ma X, Xu J, Zhang X, Yang Q, Yang D (2002) Silicon nanotubes. Adv Mater 14:1219–1221. doi: 10.1002/1521-4095(20020903)14:17<1219:AID-ADMA1219>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/1521-4095(20020903)14:17<1219::AID-ADMA1219>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
47. Shpaisman N, Givan U, Kwiat M, Pevzner A, Elnathan R, Patolsky F (2012) Controlled synthesis of ferromagnetic semiconducting silicon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 116:8000–8007. doi: 10.1021/jp203794410.1021/jp2037944 ↗
48. Slater JC (1974) The self consistent-field for molecules and solids, quantum theory of molecules and solids. McGraw-Hill, New York
49. Sorescu DC, Jordan KD, Avouris P (2001) Theoretical study of oxygen adsorption on graphite and the (8, 0) single-walled carbon nanotube. J Phys Chem B 105:11227–11232. doi: 10.1021/jp012297910.1021/jp0122979 ↗
50. Tada K, Furuya S, Watanabe K (2001) Ab initio study of hydrogen adsorption to single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 63:155405–155408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.15540510.1103/PhysRevB.63.155405 ↗
51. Tomic S, Montanari B, Harrison NM (2008) The group III-V’s semiconductor energy gaps predicted using the B3LYP hybrid functional. Physica E 40:2125–2127. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2007.10.02210.1016/j.physe.2007.10.022 ↗
52. Vosko SH, Wilk L, Nusair M (1980) Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can J Phys 58:1200–1211. doi: 10.1139/p80-15910.1139/p80-159 ↗
53. Wang N, Tang YH, Zhang YF, Lee CS, Lee ST (1998) Nucleation and growth of Si nanowires from silicon oxide. Phys Rev B 58:R16024–R16026. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R1602410.1103/PhysRevB.58.R16024 ↗
54. Wu Q, Hu Z, Wang X, Lu Y, Chen X, Xu H, Chen Y (2003) Synthesis and characterization of hexagonal aluminum nitride nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 125:10176–1017710.1021/ja0359963 ↗
55. Ye Y, Ahn CC, Witham C, Fultz B, Liu J, Rinzler AG, Colbert D, Smith KA, Smalley RE (1999) Hydrogen adsorption and cohesive energy of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 74:2307–2310. doi: 10.1063/1.12383310.1063/1.123833 ↗
56. Young DC (2001) Computational chemistry. Wiley, New York10.1002/0471220655 ↗
57. Zhang RQ, Lee ST, Law CK, Li WK, Teo BK (2002) Silicon nanotubes: Why not? Chem Phys Lett 364:251–258. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01334-910.1016/S0009-2614(02)01334-9 ↗
58. Zhang X, Cao D, Chen J (2003) Hydrogen adsorption storage on single-walled carbon nanotube arrays by a combination of classical potential and density functional theory. J Phys Chem B 107:4942–4950. doi: 10.1021/jp034110e10.1021/jp034110e ↗
59. Zhao M, Zhu JZ, Xia Y, Lu M (2007) Stabilizing zigzag single-walled silicon nanotubes and tailoring the electronic structures by oxygen atoms: first-principles studies. J Phys Chem C 111:2942–2946. doi: 10.1021/jp067434m10.1021/jp067434m ↗