journal article·2013-09Open access

Water molecular flow control with a (5,5) nanocoil switch

Shin-Pon Ju, Jenn-Sen Lin, Jin-Yuan Hsieh, Meng-Hsiung Weng, Ming-Chang Chen

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulation was employed to investigate the diffusion behaviors of water molecules within a (5,5) carbon nanocoil (CNC) at different tensile strains, the length and coil diameter of CNC are 22 and 6.83 Ǻ, respectively. Condensed-phase, optimized molecular potentials for atomistic simulation studies were employed to model the interaction between atoms. The results show that the diffusion in the axial direction can be enhanced by the tensile strain and the water molecule flow can be blocked at a higher strain once the deformed areas appear at the higher strain. Moreover, the deformed (5,5) CNC at strain of 2.8 can recover its original structure at strain of 0, indicating that the adjustment of diffusion coefficient is repeatable by applying different strains in the axial direction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Accelrys Software Inc. (2012) Discovery studio modeling environment. Release 3.5, Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego
2. Andersen HC (1980) Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 72:2384–2393. doi: 10.1063/1.43948610.1063/1.439486 ↗
3. Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M (2005) Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9:674–679. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.10.00510.1016/j.cbpa.2005.10.005 ↗
4. Byl O, Liu JC, Wang Y, Yim WL, Johnson JK, Yates JT (2006) Unusual hydrogen bonding in water-filled carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 128:12090–12097. doi: 10.1021/ja057856u10.1021/ja057856u ↗
5. Changa JH, Park W (2006) Nano elastic memory using carbon nanocoils. Joo Han Chang Wanjun Park 3:30–35
6. Chen X, Zhang S, Dikin DA, Ding W, Ruoff RS (2003) Mechanics of a carbon nanocoil. Nano Lett 3:1299–1304. doi: 10.1021/nl034367o10.1021/nl034367o ↗
7. Fang HP, Wan RZ, Gong XJ, Lu HJ, Li SY (2008) Dynamics of single-file water chains inside nanoscale channels: physics, biological significance and applications. J Phys D 41:103002. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/10/10300210.1088/0022-3727/41/10/103002 ↗
8. Holt JK, Park HG, Wang YM, Stadermann M, Artyukhin AB, Grigoropoulos CP, Noy A, Bakajin O (2006) Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312:1034–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.112629810.1126/science.1126298 ↗
9. Koga K, Gao GT, Tanaka H, Zeng XC (2001) Formation of ordered ice nanotubes inside carbon nanotubes. Nature 412. doi: 10.1038/3509053210.1038/35090532 ↗
10. Lau K, Lu M, Liao K (2006) Improved mechanical properties of coiled carbon nanotubes reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Composites A 37:1837–1840. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.019 ↗
11. Li H, Zhang XQ, Liew KM, Liu XF (2008) Structures of water molecular nanotube induced by axial tensile strains. Phys Lett A 372:6288–6293. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.03810.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.038 ↗
12. Liu LZ, Gao HL, Zhao JJ, Lu JP (2010) Superelasticity of carbon nanocoils from atomistic quantum simulations. Nanoscale Res Lett 5:478–483. doi: 10.1007/s11671-010-9545-x10.1007/s11671-010-9545-x ↗
13. Lu H, Nie XC, Wu FM, Zhou XY, Kou JL, Xu YS, Liu Y (2012) Controllable transport of water through nanochannel by rachet-like mechanism. J Chem Phys 136:174511. doi: 10.1063/1.470774410.1063/1.4707744 ↗
14. Martin CR, Kohli P (2003) The emerging field of nanotube biotechnology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:29–37. doi: 10.1038/nrd98810.1038/nrd988 ↗
15. Meunier M (2005) Diffusion coefficients of small gas molecules in amorphous cis-1,4-polybutadiene estimated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 123:134906–134907. doi: 10.1063/1.204927410.1063/1.2049274 ↗
16. Mills R (1973) Self-diffusion in normal and heavy water in the range 1–45 deg. J Phys Chem 77:685–688. doi: 10.1021/j100624a02510.1021/j100624a025 ↗
17. Müller EA, Rull FL, Vega LF, Gubbins KE (1996) Adsorption of water on activated carbons: a molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem 100:1189–1196. doi: 10.1021/jp952233w10.1021/jp952233w ↗
18. Naguib N, Ye H, Gogotsi Y, Yazicioglu AG, Megaridis CM, Yoshimur M (2004) Observation of water confined in nanometer channels of closed carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 4:2237–2243. doi: 10.1021/nl048490710.1021/nl0484907 ↗
19. Papadakis SJ, Hall AR, Williams PA, Vicci L, Falvo MR, Superfine R, Washburn S (2004) Resonant oscillators with carbon-nanotube torsion springs. Phys Rev Lett 93:146101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.14610110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.146101 ↗
20. Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52:7182–7190. doi: 10.1063/1.32869310.1063/1.328693 ↗
21. Rigby D (2004) Fluid density predictions using the COMPASS force field. Fluid Phase Equilib 217:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.fluid.2003.08.01910.1016/j.fluid.2003.08.019 ↗
22. Rossi MP, Ye HH, Gogotsi Y, Babu S, Ndungu P, Bradley JC (2004) Environmental scanning electron microscopy study of water in carbon nanopipes. Nano Lett 4:989–993. doi: 10.1021/nl049688u10.1021/nl049688u ↗
23. Sun H, Ren P, Fried JR (1998) The COMPASS force field: parameterization and validation for phosphazenes. Comput Theor Polym Sci 8:229–246. doi: 10.1016/S1089-3156(98)00042-710.1016/S1089-3156(98)00042-7 ↗
24. Swope WC, Andersen HC, Berens PH, Wilson KR (1982) A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys 76:637–649. doi: 10.1063/1.44271610.1063/1.442716 ↗
25. Thomas JA, McGaughey AJH, Kuter-Arnebeck O (2010) Pressure-driven water flow through carbon nanotubes: insights from molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Therm Sci 49:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.07.00810.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.07.008 ↗
26. Verlet L (1967) Computer “Experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard–Jones molecules. Phys Rev 159:98–103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.159.9810.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗
27. Weinan E, Dong L (2008) The Andersen thermostat in molecular dynamics. Commun Pure Appl Math 61:96–136. doi: 10.1002/cpa.2019810.1002/cpa.20198 ↗
28. Williams PA, Papadakis SJ, Patel AM, Falvo MR, Washburn S, Superfine R (2003) Fabrication of nanometer-scale mechanical devices incorporating individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes as torsional springs. Appl Phys Lett 82:805–807. doi: 10.1063/1.153834610.1063/1.1538346 ↗
29. Zhao H, Rizal B, McMahon G, Wang H, Dhakal P, Kirkpatrick T, Ren Z, Chiles TC, Naughton MJ, Cai D (2012) Ultrasensitive chemical detection using a nanocoax sensor. ACS Nano 6:3171–3178. doi: 10.1021/nn205036e10.1021/nn205036e ↗
30. Zheng J, Lennon EM, Tsao HK, Sheng YJ, Jiang SY (2005) Transport of a liquid water and methanol mixture through carbon nanotubes under a chemical potential gradient. J Chem Phys 122:214702. doi: 10.1063/1.190861910.1063/1.1908619 ↗