3D distributed modeling of trolling-mode AFM during 2D manipulation of a spherical cell
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a general 3D distributed modeling of Trolling-Mode AFM (TR-AFM) as a nanorobot is presented to analyze the 2D manipulation process of a spherical cell. To this aim, the analysis is categorized into 3 sections. In the first section, 6 deformations of TR-AFM are taken into account, and the standard model of the system is obtained. Moreover, the system is simulated in ANSYS Workbench. The results of modal and transient analyses of the system from both analytical and software methods reveal high agreement, which confirms the accuracy of the presented analytical model. In the second section, by utilizing the 3D derived model, displacement of a spherical yeast single cell (W303) with 2 µm radius is simulated, and the result is verified with that of experiment. It is demonstrated that lateral manipulation requires less force and time in comparison to longitudinal one. In the last section, stress analysis is accomplished in ANSYS for TR-AFM to assure that the designed system withstands the created stresses with a good factor of safety. As a result, an optimized TR-AFM is proposed and analyzed from dynamic and stress points of view. Moreover, 3D simulation of the 2D manipulation process is done successfully, and the result has shown well matching with those of experiment and another similar simulation, confirming the applicability of the proposed system. Through this detailed investigation, an optimized TR-AFM is recommended to substitute the classic AFMs in manipulation of cells, due to its smaller inserted force to the fragile and sensitive bio-samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdi A, Pishkenari HN, Keramati R, Minary-Jolandan M (2015) Dynamics of the nanoneedle probe in trolling mode AFM. Nanotechnology. 26:20570210.1088/0957-4484/26/20/205702 ↗
2. Eremeyev VA (2016) On effective properties of materials at the nano- and microscales considering surface effects. Acta Mech 227:29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-015-1427-y10.1007/s00707-015-1427-y ↗
3. Eslami S, Jalili N (2012) A comprehensive modeling and vibration analysis of AFM microcantilevers subjected to nonlinear tip-sample interaction forces. Ultramicroscopy. 117:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.01610.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.016 ↗
4. Eslami S, Jalili N, Dawson DM (2011) Adaptive trajectory tracking control of microcantilever’s tip used in AFM with a general nonlinear tip-sample interaction force. In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2011. pp. 2885–2890. IEEE10.1109/ACC.2011.5991589 ↗
5. Falvo MR, Superfine R (2000) Mechanics and friction at the nanometer scale. J Nanopart Res 2:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101001713013610.1023/A:1010017130136 ↗
6. Garcıa R, Perez R (2002) Dynamic atomic force microscopy methods. Surf Sci Rep 47:197–30110.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-8 ↗
7. Habibnejad Korayem M, Rastegar Z (2020) Development of 3D manipulation of viscoelastic biological cells by AFM based on contact models and oscillatory drag. Mech Adv Mater Struct 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.174766610.1080/15376494.2020.1747666 ↗
8. Hu J, Yu M-F (2010) Meniscus-confined three-dimensional electrodeposition for direct writing of wire bonds. Science (80-) 329:313–31610.1126/science.1190496 ↗
9. Jalili N, Laxminarayana K (2004) A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics. 14:907–94510.1016/j.mechatronics.2004.04.005 ↗
10. Kim J, Sung B, Kim BI, Jhe W (2013) Optimization of force sensitivity in Q-controlled amplitude-modulation atomic force microscopy. J Appl Phys 114:54302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481727910.1063/1.4817279 ↗
11. Korayem MH, Damircheli M (2014) The effect of fluid properties and geometrical parameters of cantilever on the frequency response of atomic force microscopy. Precis Eng 38:321–32910.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.11.002 ↗
12. Korayem MH, Motaghi A, Zakeri M (2011) Dynamic modeling of submerged nanoparticle pushing based on atomic force microscopy in liquid medium. J Nanopart Res 13:5009–501910.1007/s11051-011-0482-0 ↗
13. Korayem MH, Rastegar Z, Taheri M (2012) Sensitivity analysis of nano-contact mechanics models in manipulation of biological cell. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2:49–5610.5923/j.nn.20120203.02 ↗
14. Korayem MH, Mahmoodi Z, Taheri M, Saraee MB (2015) Three-dimensional modeling and simulation of the AFM-based manipulation of spherical biological micro/nanoparticles with the consideration of contact mechanics theories. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-body Dyn 229:370–382
15. Korayem MH, Habibi Sooha Y, Rastegar Z (2018a) Modeling and simulation of viscoelastic biological particles’ 3D manipulation using atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 124:392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-1772-510.1007/s00339-018-1772-5 ↗
16. Korayem MH, Mahmoodi Z, Mohammadi M (2018b) 3D investigation of dynamic behavior and sensitivity analysis of the parameters of spherical biological particles in the first phase of AFM-based manipulations with the consideration of humidity effect. J Theor Biol 436:105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.09.01610.1016/j.jtbi.2017.09.016 ↗
17. Li K, Zhang W, Huang Y, Chen Y (2011) Aggregation kinetics of CeO2 nanoparticles in KCl and CaCl2 solutions: measurements and modeling. J Nanopart Res 13:6483–6491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0548-z10.1007/s11051-011-0548-z ↗
18. Lin, S-M, Liauh C-T, Wang W-R (2019) Assessment of different theories about size dependency effect on the resonant frequency of an AFM subjected to van der Waals force. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2019.169747110.1080/15376494.2019.1697471 ↗
19. Minary Jolandan, M.: Scanning probe microscopy of biomaterials and nanoscale biomechanics, (2011)
20. Minary-Jolandan M, Yu M-F (2013) Nanomechanical imaging of soft samples in liquid using atomic force microscopy. J Appl Phys 114:13431310.1063/1.4824080 ↗
21. Minary-Jolandan M, Tajik A, Wang N, Yu M-F (2012) Intrinsically high-Q dynamic AFM imaging in liquid with a significantly extended needle tip. Nanotechnology. 23:23570410.1088/0957-4484/23/23/235704 ↗
22. Mohammadi SZ, Moghaddam M, Pishkenari HN (2019) Dynamical modeling of manipulation process in Trolling-Mode AFM. Ultramicroscopy. 197:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.11.01710.1016/j.ultramic.2018.11.017 ↗
23. Morris VJ, Kirby AR, Gunning AP(2009) Atomic force microscopy for biologists. World Sci10.1142/p674 ↗
24. Nguyen VP, Choi ST (2019) Extended JKR theory on adhesive contact of coated spheres. Acta Mech 230:4213–4233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-019-02499-410.1007/s00707-019-02499-4 ↗
25. Oćwieja M, Morga M, Adamczyk Z (2013) Self-assembled silver nanoparticles monolayers on mica-AFM, SEM, and electrokinetic characteristics. J Nanopart Res 15:1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1460-510.1007/s11051-013-1460-5 ↗
26. Pishkenari HN, Meghdari A (2011) Effects of higher oscillation modes on TM-AFM measurements. Ultramicroscopy. 111:107–11610.1016/j.ultramic.2010.10.015 ↗
27. Pishkenari HN, Jalili N, Meghdari A (2006) Acquisition of high-precision images for non-contact atomic force microscopy. Mechatronics. 16:655–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.04.00210.1016/j.mechatronics.2006.04.002 ↗
28. Rao SS(2007) Vibration of continuous systems. Wiley10.1002/9780470117866 ↗
29. Saeidpourazar R, Jalili N (2007) A closed-form distributed-parameters modeling framework for piezoresistive-based microcantilever sensors with application to nanoscale force measurement. In: ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. pp. 1383–1392. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IMECE2007-42507 ↗
30. Saeidpourazar R, Jalili N (2008) Microcantilever-based force tracking with applications to high-resolution imaging and nanomanipulation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 55:3935–394310.1109/TIE.2008.2002737 ↗
31. Sajjadi M, Pishkenari HN, Vossoughi G (2017a) Dynamic modeling of trolling-mode AFM: considering effects of cantilever torsion, nanoneedle flexibility and liquid-nanoneedle interactions. Ultramicroscopy. 182:99–11110.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.009 ↗
32. Sajjadi M, Pishkenari HN, Vossoughi G (2017b) Dynamic modeling of trolling-mode AFM: considering effects of cantilever torsion, nanoneedle flexibility and liquid-nanoneedle interactions. Ultramicroscopy. 182:99–11110.1016/j.ultramic.2017.06.009 ↗
33. Sajjadi M, Pishkenari HN, Vossoughi G (2018a) On the nonlinear dynamics of trolling-mode AFM: Analytical solution using multiple time scales method. J Sound Vib 423:263–28610.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.047 ↗
34. Sajjadi M, Pishkenari HN, Vossoughi G (2018b) Finite element modeling of trolling-mode AFM. Ultramicroscopy. 189:24–3810.1016/j.ultramic.2018.03.008 ↗
35. Seifnejad Haghighi M, Sajjadi M, Nejat Pishkenari H (2020) Model-based topography estimation in trolling mode atomic force microscopy. Appl Math Model 77:1025–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.08.01410.1016/j.apm.2019.08.014 ↗
36. Shen Y, Nakajima M, Ridzuan Ahmad M, Kojima S, Homma M, Fukuda T (2011) Effect of ambient humidity on the strength of the adhesion force of single yeast cell inside environmental-SEM. Ultramicroscopy. 111:1176–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.02.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2011.02.008 ↗
37. Sitti M, Hashimoto H (2000) Controlled pushing of nanoparticles: modeling and experiments. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 5:199–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/3516.84709310.1109/3516.847093 ↗
38. Sümer B, Sitti M (2008) Rolling and spinning friction characterization of fine particles using lateral force microscopy based contact pushing. J Adhes Sci Technol 22:481–50610.1163/156856108X295527 ↗
39. Suryavanshi AP, Yu M-F (2007) Electrochemical fountain pen nanofabrication of vertically grown platinum nanowires. Nanotechnology. 18:10530510.1088/0957-4484/18/10/105305 ↗
40. Tafazzoli A, Sitti M (2004a) Dynamic modes of nanoparticle motion during nanoprobe-based manipulation. In: Nanotechnology, 2004. 4th IEEE Conference on. pp. 35–37. IEEE
41. Tafazzoli A, Sitti M (2004b) Dynamic behavior and simulation of nanoparticle sliding during nanoprobe-based positioning. In: ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. pp. 965–972. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IMECE2004-62470 ↗
42. Tafazzoli A, Pawashe C, Sitti M (2005) Atomic force microscope based two-dimensional assembly of micro/nanoparticles. In: Assembly and Task Planning: From Nano to Macro Assembly and Manufacturing, 2005.(ISATP 2005). The 6th IEEE International Symposium on. pp. 230–235. IEEE
43. Wang C-C, Yau H-T (2008) Analysis of nonlinear dynamic behavior of atomic force microscope using differential transformation method. Acta Mech 198:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-007-0516-y10.1007/s00707-007-0516-y ↗
44. Yazdanpanah MM, Harfenist SA, Safir A, Cohn RW (2005) Selective self-assembly at room temperature of individual freestanding Ag 2 Ga alloy nanoneedles. J Appl Phys 98:7351010.1063/1.2060930 ↗
45. Zakeri M, Faraji J, Kharazmi M (2016) Multipoint contact modeling of nanoparticle manipulation on rough surface. J Nanopart Res 18:374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3639-z10.1007/s11051-016-3639-z ↗
46. Zhang J, Li G, Xi N (2005) Modeling and control of active end effector for the AFM based nano robotic manipulators. In: Robotics and Automation, 2005. ICRA 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on. pp. 163–168. IEEE
47. Zhang L, Feng X, Li S (2017) Review and perspective on soft matter modeling in cellular mechanobiology: cell contact, adhesion, mechanosensing, and motility. Acta Mech 228:4095–4122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-2057-310.1007/s00707-017-2057-3 ↗