journal article·2016-07

Fugitive emissions from nanopowder manufacturing

W. J. Trompetter, T. Ancelet, P. K. Davy, J. Kennedy

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

In response to health and safety questions and concerns regarding particulate matter emissions from equipment used for synthesizing NiFe and TiO2 nanopowders, a study was undertaken to assess their impact on the air quality inside and outside a laboratory where the manufacturing equipment is operated. Elemental concentrations determined by ion beam analysis (IBA) of air particulate matter (PM) samples collected hourly with a StreakerTM sampler were used to identify possible sources and estimate contributions from nanopowder production and other sources. The fugitive nanopowder emissions were the highest at the indoor sampling location when powders were being manufactured. Average fugitive emissions of 210 ng m−3 (1-h average) (maximum 2163 ng m−3 1-h average) represented 2 % (maximum 20 %) of the average PM collected (9359 ng m−3 1-h average). The measured NiFe alloy or TiO2 PM concentrations were much smaller than the 8-h time-weighted average (TWA) workplace exposure standards (WES) for these materials (≥1,000,000 ng m−3). Most PM was found to be from infiltrated outdoor ambient sources. This suggests that nanopowder production in the laboratory is not likely to have adverse health effects on individuals using the equipment, although further improvements can be made to further limit exposure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Quality and Health Impacts · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Vehicle emissions and performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Ancelet T, Davy PK, Trompetter WJ, Markwitz A, Weatherburn DC (2011) Carbonaceous aerosols in an urban tunnel. Atmos Environ 45:4463–4469. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.03210.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.032 ↗
2. Ancelet T, Davy PK, Trompetter WJ, Markwitz A, Weatherburn DC (2014a) Particulate matter sources on an hourly time-scale in a rural community during the winter. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 64(5):501–50810.1080/10962247.2013.813414 ↗
3. Ancelet T, Davy PK, Trompetter WJ, Markwitz A, Weatherburn DC (2014b) Sources and transport of particulate matter on an hourly time-scale during the winter in a New Zealand urban valley. Urban Clim 10(P4):644–65510.1016/j.uclim.2014.06.003 ↗
4. Ancelet T, Davy PK, Trompetter WJ (2015) Hourly variations in particulate matter source contributions in New Zealand’s southernmost city. Air Qual Clim Chang 49(3):27–33
5. Annegarn HJ, Cahill TA, Sellschop JFP, Zucchiatti A (1988) Time sequence particulate sampling and nuclear analysis. Phys Script 37:282–29010.1088/0031-8949/37/2/016 ↗
6. Annegarn HJ, Marcazzan GMB, Cereda E, Marchionni M, Zucchiatti A (1992) Source profiles by unique ratios (spur) analysis: determination of source profiles from receptor-site streaker samples. Atmos Environ 26(2):333–34310.1016/0960-1686(92)90314-B ↗
7. Annegarn HJ, Flanz M, Kenntner T, Kneen MA, Helas G, Piketh SJ (1996) Airborne streaker sampling for PIXE analysis. Nuc Inst Method Phys Res B 109–110:548–55010.1016/0168-583X(95)00966-3 ↗
8. Brown DM, Wilson MR, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K (2001) Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 175(3):191–19910.1006/taap.2001.9240 ↗
9. Cahill TA, Eldred RA et al (1989) Indirect measurement of hydrocarbon aerosols across the United States by nonsulfate hydrogen-remaining gravimetric mass correlations. Aerosol Sci Technol 10(2):421–42910.1080/02786828908959281 ↗
10. Cohen DD (1999) Accelerator based ion beam techniques for trace element aerosol analysis. In: Creatchman M (ed) Advances in environmental, industrial and process control technologies, vol 1. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 139–196
11. D’Alessandro A, Nava S, Van Ham R, Adriaens A, Lucarelli F, Marcazzan G, Prati P, Valli G, Vecchi R, Zucchiatti A (2004) PIXE and ToF-SIMS analysis of streaker samplers filters. Nuc Inst Method Phys Res B 222(1–2):261–26910.1016/j.nimb.2004.02.014 ↗
12. Donaldson K, Stone V, Clouter A, Renwick L, MacNee W (2001) Ultrafine particles. Occup Environ Med 58(3):211–21610.1136/oem.58.3.211 ↗
13. Fang F, Futter J, Markwitz A, Kennedy J (2009) UV and humidity sensing properties of ZnO nanorods prepared by the arc discharge method. Nanotechnology 20:24550210.1088/0957-4484/20/24/245502 ↗
14. Fang F, Kennedy J, Carder DA, Futter J, Murmu P, Markwitz A (2010) Modulation of field emission properties of ZnO nanorods during arc discharge. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(12):8239–824310.1166/jnn.2010.3009 ↗
15. Fang F, Kennedy J, Futter J, Hopf T, Markwitz A, Manikandan E, Henshaw G (2011) Size-controlled synthesis and gas sensing application of tungsten oxide nanostructures produced by arc discharge. Nanotechnology 22(33):33570210.1088/0957-4484/22/33/335702 ↗
16. Fang F, Kennedy J, Manikandan E, Futter J, Markwitz A (2012) Morphology and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized by arc discharge. Chem Phys Lett 521:86–9010.1016/j.cplett.2011.11.046 ↗
17. Filippi E, Prati P, Zucchiatti A, Lucarelli F, Ariola V, Corvisiero P (1999) Hourly measurement of particulate concentrations with streaker samplers and optical methods. Nuc Inst Method Phys Res B 150(1–4):370–37410.1016/S0168-583X(98)01075-1 ↗
18. Kavouras IG, Koutrakis P, Cereceda-Balic F, Oyola P (2001) Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in five Chilean cities using factor analysis. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 51:451–46410.1080/10473289.2001.10464273 ↗
19. Kennedy J, Futter J, Fang F, Markwitz A (2010) Zinc oxide nanostructures. New Zealand Patent Application WO/2010/120196
20. Maenhaut W, Cafmeyer J (1987) Particle induced x-ray emission analysis and multivariate techniques: an application to the study of the sources of respirable atmospheric particles in Ghent, Belgium. J Trace Microprobe Tech 5:135–158
21. Maenhaut W, Malmqvist KG (2001) Particle induced X-ray emission analysis. In: Grieken RV (ed) Handbook of x-ray spectrometry. Marcel Dekker Inc, Antwerp
22. Malm WC, Sisler JF et al (1994) Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 99(D1):1347–137010.1029/93JD02916 ↗
23. Murmu PP, Kennedy J, Williams GVM, Prakash T, Leveneur J, Chong SV, Rubanov S (2015) Synthesis and compositional analysis of permalloy powder prepared by arc-discharge. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:9612–961610.1166/jnn.2015.10731 ↗
24. Myung CL, Ko A, Park S (2014) Review on characterization of nano-particle emissions and PM morphology from internal combustion engines: part 1. Int J Automot Technol 15(2):203–21810.1007/s12239-014-0022-x ↗
25. Prakash T, Williams GVM, Kennedy J, Murmu PP, Leveneur J, Chong SV, Rubanov S (2014) Synthesis and structural, magnetic and magnetotransport properties of permalloy powders containing nanoparticles prepared by arc discharge. J Alloy Compd 608:153–15710.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.111 ↗
26. Swietlicki E, Puri S, Hansson H-C, Edner H (1996) Urban air pollution source apportionment using a combination of aerosol and gas monitoring techniques. Atmos Environ 30:2795–280910.1016/1352-2310(95)00322-3 ↗
27. Thurston GD, Spengler JD (1985) A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in metropolitan Boston. Atmos Environ 19:9–2510.1016/0004-6981(85)90132-5 ↗
28. Trompetter WJ, Markwitz A, Davy P (2005) Air particulate research capability at the New Zealand ion beam analysis facility using PIXE & IBA techniques. Int J PIXE 15(3–4):249–25510.1142/S0129083505000581 ↗
29. Wolden CA, Kurtin J, Baxter JB, Repins I, Shaheen SE, Torvik JT, Rockett AA, Fthenakis VM, Aydil ES (2011) Photovoltaic manufacturing: present status, future prospects, and research needs. J Vac Sci Technol A 29(3):03080110.1116/1.3569757 ↗