Positive dielectrophoresis used for selective trapping of nanoparticles from flue gas in a gradient field electrodes device
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates the possibility to use positive dielectrophoresis (pDEP) for selective trapping of nanoparticle dispersed in flue gas in a vertical pDEP-based microfluidic system. The experimental gradient field electrodes device contains as main part a vertical deposition plate with parallel planar electrodes in single connection on an insulating substrate, parallel to the reference electrode—a dielectric plate with a metalized side. The performances of the device were described and analyzed by numerical simulations and experimental tests in terms of two new specific parameters, called Retention rate and Filtration, related to the trapping of nanoparticles in suspension inside the device and the consequent purification of flue gas. It is outlined, both numerically and experimentally, that the concentration of particles trapped inside the device decreases as they are moving away from the inlet zone. The experimental results also highlight the nanoparticle size distribution of the particles collected from the deposition plate, using a nanoparticle tracking analysis method, and their selective capture on the deposition plate, depending on the amplitude and shape of the applied voltage, in a good agreement with the numerical simulations results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Barbaros C, Dongqing L (2011) Review: dielectrophoresis in microfluidics technology. Electrophoresis 32:2410–242710.1002/elps.201100167 ↗
2. Chang M, Huang C (2001) Characteristics of energy flow in municipal solid waste incinerator. J Environ Eng 127:78–8110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:1(78) ↗
3. Crews N, Darabi J, Voglewede P, Guo F, Bayoumi A (2007) An analysis of interdigitated electrode geometry for dielectrophoretic particle transport in micro-fluidics. Sens Actuators B 125:672–67910.1016/j.snb.2007.02.047 ↗
4. Dash S, Mohanty S, Pradhan S, Mishra BK (2015) CFD design of a microfluidic device for continuous dielectrophoretic separation of charged gold nanoparticles, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, In press10.1016/j.jtice.2015.05.034 ↗
5. Gatti A, Montenari S (2014) Nanopathology: the nano-bio-interaction of nanoparticles inside the human body, in nanoparticles’ promises and risks. Springer, Cham
6. Green NG, Ramos A, Morgan H (2002) Numerical solution of the dielectrophoretic and travelling wave forces for interdigitated electrode arrays using the finite element method. J Electrostat 56:235–25410.1016/S0304-3886(02)00069-4 ↗
7. Hu G, Li D (2007) Multiscale phenomena in microfluidics and nanofluidics. Chem Eng Sci 62:3443–345410.1016/j.ces.2006.11.058 ↗
8. Khoshmanesh K, Nahavandia S, Baratchib S, Mitchellc S, Kalantar-zadeh K (2011) Dielectrophoretic platforms for bio-microfluidic systems. Biosens Bioelectron 26(5):1800–181410.1016/j.bios.2010.09.022 ↗
9. Lungu M, Giugiulan R, Lungu A, Bunoiu M, Neculae A (2013) Flue gas filtration by entrapment of nanoparticles in a microfluidic device using dielectrophoresis. Ann West Univ Timisoara, Phys Series 57:1–610.1515/awutp-2015-0101 ↗
10. Lungu M, Bunoiu M, Neculae A (2014a) Dielectrophoresis used for nanoparticle manipulation in microfluidic devices, in nanoparticles’ promises and risks. Springer, Cham
11. Lungu A, Lungu M, Neculae A, Giugiulan R (2014b) Nanoparticle characterization using nanoparticle tracking analysis, 2014., Nanoparticles’ promises and risksSpringer, Cham
12. Malaescu I, Lungu M, Giugiulan R, Strambeanu N (2014) The Clausius–Mossotti factor in low frequency field of the powders resulted from waste combustion. Rom J Phys 59(7–8):862–872
13. Mathew B, Alazzam A, Abutayeh M, Gawanmeh A, Khashan S (2015) Modeling the trajectory of microparticles subjected to dielectrophoresis in a microfluidic device for field flow fractionation. Chem Eng Sci 138:266–28010.1016/j.ces.2015.07.014 ↗
14. Minutolo P, Sgro L, Costagliola M, Prati M, Sirignano M, D’Anna A (2010) Ultrafine particle emission from combustion devices burning natural gas. Chem Eng Trans 22:239–244
15. Neculae A, Biris C, Bunoiu M, Lungu M (2012) Numerical analysis of nanoparticles behavior in a microfluidic channel under dielectrophoresis. J Nanopart Res 14:1–1210.1007/s11051-012-1154-4 ↗
16. Pethig R (2010) Review Article—Dielectrophoresis: Status of the theory, technology, and applications. Biomicrofluidics 4:022811-1–022811-34
17. Rickerby D, Morrison M (2007) Report from the workshop on nanotechnologies for environmental remediation, JRC Ispra, http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/reports/reportpdf/report101.pdf
18. Saveyn H, De Baets B, Hole P, Smith J, Van der Meeren P (2010) Accurate particle size distribution determination by nanoparticle tracking analysis based on 2-D Brownian dynamics simulation. J Colloid Interface Sci 352(2):593–60010.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.006 ↗
19. Shegokar S (2014) Nanotoxicity: must consider aspect of nanoparticle development, in nanoparticles’ promises and risks. Springer, Cham
20. Wang R (2015) Nanoparticles influence droplet formation in a T-shaped microfluidic. J Nanopart Res 15:212810.1007/s11051-013-2128-x ↗
21. Wang Y, Du F, Baune M, Thöming J (2015) Predicting and eliminating Joule heating constraints in large dielectrophoretic IDE separators. Chem Eng Sci 137:235–24210.1016/j.ces.2015.06.042 ↗
22. Zeng J (2009) Electrohydrodynamic modeling and its applications to microfluidic devices, Proceedings of IMECE2009, ASME international mechanical engineering congress & exposition, November 13–19, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA, 214–222