journal article·2002-08Open access

Direct Observation of the Molten State of Nanometer-sized Particles With an Atomic Force Microscope: A Feasibility Study

S. Ismail, K. Deppert, T. Junno, C. Kortegaard, H. Larne, M.H. Magnusson, C. Thelander, L. Samuelson

Abstract

An atomic force microscope (AFM) was used to directly examine the physical state of nanometer-sized particles. The critical diameter of indium particles, where evidence of melting at room temperature was observed, was 7.8 ± 1.2 nm. This conclusion is based on a method relying on the manipulation of particles in ambient air and at constant temperature. This method involves a simple set-up that permits a combination of both manipulation and imaging of individual particles. To determine whether a particle is molten, three criteria are used: the merging of particles to form bigger spherical particles, a tip-induced shape change, and the formation of nanofibers. All three criteria have been checked using other particle materials. An attempt at 56°C revealed oxidation of the indium particles as the major problem for melting investigation. Manipulations under high-purity nitrogen atmosphere support the validity of the findings. The use of the AFM to determine whether a nanoparticle is molten is, however, complicated by the oxidation issue.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Berman R.P. & A.E. Curzon, 1974. Canadian J. Phys. 52, 923.10.1139/p74-125 ↗
2. Buffat P. & J.-P. Borel, 1976. Phys. Rev. A 13, 2287.10.1103/PhysRevA.13.2287 ↗
3. CRC, 1997. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
4. Deppert K., I. Maximov, L. Samuelson, H.-C. Hansson & A. Wiedensohler, 1994. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3293.10.1063/1.111314 ↗
5. Junno T., S. Anand, K. Deppert, L. Montelius & L. Samuelson, 1995a. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3295.10.1063/1.113735 ↗
6. Junno T., K. Deppert, L. Montelius & L. Samuelson, 1995b. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3627.10.1063/1.113809 ↗
7. Junno T., M.H. Magnusson, S.-B. Carlsson, K. Deppert, J.-O. Malm, L. Montelius & L. Samuelson, 1999. Microelectr. Eng. 47, 179.10.1016/S0167-9317(99)00184-7 ↗
8. Knutson E.O. & K.T. Whitby, 1975. J. Aerosol Sci. 6, 443.10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9 ↗
9. McClelland M.A. & J.S. Sze, 1995. Surf. Sci. 330, 313.10.1016/0039-6028(95)00358-4 ↗
10. Montelius L. & J.O. Tegenfeldt, 1993. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2628.10.1063/1.109267 ↗
11. Takagi M., 1954. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 9, 359.10.1143/JPSJ.9.359 ↗
12. Thelander C., M.H. Magnusson, K. Deppert, L. Samuelson, P. Rugaard Poulsen, J. Nygård & J. Borggreen, 2001. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2106.10.1063/1.1405154 ↗