Direct Observation of the Molten State of Nanometer-sized Particles With an Atomic Force Microscope: A Feasibility Study
Source abstract
Abstract
An atomic force microscope (AFM) was used to directly examine the physical state of nanometer-sized particles. The critical diameter of indium particles, where evidence of melting at room temperature was observed, was 7.8 ± 1.2 nm. This conclusion is based on a method relying on the manipulation of particles in ambient air and at constant temperature. This method involves a simple set-up that permits a combination of both manipulation and imaging of individual particles. To determine whether a particle is molten, three criteria are used: the merging of particles to form bigger spherical particles, a tip-induced shape change, and the formation of nanofibers. All three criteria have been checked using other particle materials. An attempt at 56°C revealed oxidation of the indium particles as the major problem for melting investigation. Manipulations under high-purity nitrogen atmosphere support the validity of the findings. The use of the AFM to determine whether a nanoparticle is molten is, however, complicated by the oxidation issue.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Berman R.P. & A.E. Curzon, 1974. Canadian J. Phys. 52, 923.10.1139/p74-125 ↗
2. Buffat P. & J.-P. Borel, 1976. Phys. Rev. A 13, 2287.10.1103/PhysRevA.13.2287 ↗
3. CRC, 1997. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
4. Deppert K., I. Maximov, L. Samuelson, H.-C. Hansson & A. Wiedensohler, 1994. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3293.10.1063/1.111314 ↗
5. Junno T., S. Anand, K. Deppert, L. Montelius & L. Samuelson, 1995a. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3295.10.1063/1.113735 ↗
6. Junno T., K. Deppert, L. Montelius & L. Samuelson, 1995b. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3627.10.1063/1.113809 ↗
7. Junno T., M.H. Magnusson, S.-B. Carlsson, K. Deppert, J.-O. Malm, L. Montelius & L. Samuelson, 1999. Microelectr. Eng. 47, 179.10.1016/S0167-9317(99)00184-7 ↗
8. Knutson E.O. & K.T. Whitby, 1975. J. Aerosol Sci. 6, 443.10.1016/0021-8502(75)90060-9 ↗
9. McClelland M.A. & J.S. Sze, 1995. Surf. Sci. 330, 313.10.1016/0039-6028(95)00358-4 ↗
10. Montelius L. & J.O. Tegenfeldt, 1993. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2628.10.1063/1.109267 ↗
11. Takagi M., 1954. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 9, 359.10.1143/JPSJ.9.359 ↗
12. Thelander C., M.H. Magnusson, K. Deppert, L. Samuelson, P. Rugaard Poulsen, J. Nygård & J. Borggreen, 2001. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2106.10.1063/1.1405154 ↗