Micro-electromechanical Systems for Nano-science
Source abstract
Abstract
Micro-electromechanical systems are ideal tools for nano-science because they bridge the gap between the nano- and the macro-world. Moreover, several of these instruments can be operated in parallel to either increase the throughput or to provide redundancy. The majority of the components of such a system have dimensions above the nanometer scale. Still, some require placement and pattern accuracy well below this limit. This will be highlighted in a short review of a few examples: Scanning optical near field microscope probe fabrication, where an aperture of 50 nm in diameter was incorporated at the probing tip; parallel scanning force microscope for measuring dust particles on Mars where redundancy is essential; and a miniaturized electron column for parallel electron beam lithography, where the throughput needs to be increased.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Berger R., Lang H.P., Gerber Ch., Gimzewski J.K., Fabian J.H., Scandella L., Meyer E. & Güntherodt H.-J., 1998. Chem. Phys. Let. 294, 363.10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00817-3 ↗
2. Chang T.H.P., Kern D.P. & McCord M.A., 1989. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B7 1855.10.1116/1.584680 ↗
3. Despont M., Staufer U., Stebler C., Germann R. & Vettiger P., 1995. Microelectronic Eng. 27, 467.10.1016/0167-9317(94)00147-M ↗
4. Despont M., Gross H., Arrouy F., Stebler C. & Staufer U., 1996. Sensors and Actuators A55, 219.10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80081-7 ↗
5. Gimzewski J.-K., Gerber Ch., Meyer E. & Schlittler R.R., 1994. Chem Phys. Lett. 217, 589.10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1419-H ↗
6. MEC, 2000. http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/2001/lander/meca/
7. OSH, 1974. OSHA Fact Sheet No. 96–54. http://www.oshaslc. gov/SLTC/silicacrystalline/silica criteria/
8. Pohl D. W., Denk W. & Lanz M., 1984. Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 651.10.1063/1.94865 ↗
9. Schürmann G., Indermühle P.F., Staufer U. & de Rooij N.F., 1999. Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 299.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199905/06)27:5/6<299::AID-SIA510>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
10. Schürmann G., Noell W., Staufer U. & de Rooij N.F., 2000. Ultramicroscopy 82, 33.10.1016/S0304-3991(99)00122-9 ↗
11. Stebler C., Despont M., Staufer U., Chang T.H.P., Lee K.Y. & Rishton S.A., 1996. Microelectronic Eng. 30, 45.10.1016/0167-9317(95)00191-3 ↗
12. Stebler C., Despont M. & Staufer U., 1996. J. Phys III France 6, 1435.
13. Stebler C., Pfeffer T., Staufer U. & de Rooij N.F., 1999. Microelectronic Eng. 46, 401.10.1016/S0167-9317(99)00118-5 ↗
14. Tortonese M., Barett R.C. & Quate C.F., 1993. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 834.10.1063/1.108593 ↗
15. Vettiger P., Brugger J., Despont M., Drechsler U., Dürig U., Häberle W., Lutwyche M., Rothuizen H., Stutz R., Widmer R. & Binnig G., 1999. Microelectronic Eng. 46, 11–17.10.1016/S0167-9317(99)00006-4 ↗