Continuous biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles in a hydrodynamic cavitation device and modeling of the process by numerical simulation strategy
Source abstract
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) with size distribution 7.1 ± 1.2 nm are continuously biosynthesized with Cacumen platycladi (CP) leaf extract (0.3 g/L) at room temperature (30 °C) in the hydrodynamic cavitation device. The products are characterized by UV-Vis absorption spectra, XRD, TEM, and HRTEM, confirming that AgNPs with uniform distribution are successfully synthesized. CFD and population balance equation (PBE) coupled models are built to simulate the AgNP formation process and calculate the corresponding particle size distribution numerically. The coupled model is validated accurately and effectively with experiment in simulating of AgNP formation and predicting the particle size distribution (PSD) in the hydrodynamic cavitation device.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Aadil KR, Barapatre A, Meena AS, Jha H (2016) Hydrogen peroxide sensing and cytotoxicity acticity of Acacia lignin stabilized silvernanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 82:39–4710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.09.072 ↗
2. Arrojo S, Benito Y (2008) A theoretical study of hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem 15:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.03.00710.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.03.007 ↗
3. Baletto F, Ferrando R (2005) Structural properties of nanoclusters: energetic, thermodynamic, and kinetic effects. Rev Mod Phys 77:371–42310.1103/RevModPhys.77.371 ↗
4. Baletto F, Ferrando R, Fortunelli A, Montaleti F, Mottet C (2002) Crossover among structural motifs in transition and noble-metal clusters. J Chem Phys 116:3856–386310.1063/1.1448484 ↗
5. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007) CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ 41:238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.01910.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.019 ↗
6. Capocelli M, Musmarra D, Prisciandaro M, Lancia A (2014) Chemical effect of hydrodynamic cavitation: simulation and experimental comparison. AIChE J 60:2566–2572. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.1447210.1002/aic.14472 ↗
7. Crookes-Goodson WJ, Slocik JM, Naik RR (2008) Bio-directed synthesis and assembly of nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 37:2403–2412. https://doi.org/10.1039/b702825n10.1039/b702825n ↗
8. Dipankar C, Murugan S (2012) The green synthesis, characterization and evaluation of the biological activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Iresine herbstii leaf aqueous extracts. Colloids Surf B-Biointerfaces 98:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.00610.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.006 ↗
9. Find J, Emerson SC, Krausz IM, Moser WR (2001) Hydrodynamic cavitation as a tool to control macro-, micro-, and nano-properties of inorganic materials. J Mater Res 16:3503–3513. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2001.048110.1557/jmr.2001.0481 ↗
10. FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide (2006)
11. Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2000) Engineering design methods for cavitation reactors II: hydrodynamic cavitation. AIChE J 46:1641–1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69046081510.1002/aic.690460815 ↗
12. Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2001) Hydrodynamic cavitation reactors: a state of the art review. Rev Chem Eng 17:1–8510.1515/REVCE.2001.17.1.1 ↗
13. Haijun L, Xingzhi P, Benli W (2011) Effect of cavitation shape and hydrodynamic drag property of submarine launching missile of water depth. 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology.
14. Hu X, Guo L (2010) Numerical investigations of catalyst-liquid slurry flow in the photocatalytic reactor for hydrogen production based on algebraic slip model. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:7065–7072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.16210.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.162 ↗
15. Huang QS, Yang C, Yu GZ, Mao ZS (2010) CFD simulation of hydrodynamics and mass transfer in an internal airlift loop reactor using a steady two-fluid model. Chem Eng Sci 65:5527–5536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.07.02110.1016/j.ces.2010.07.021 ↗
16. Kumar KS, Moholkar VS (2007) Conceptual design of a novel hydrodynamic cavitation reactor. Chem Eng Sci 62:2698–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.02.01010.1016/j.ces.2007.02.010 ↗
17. Kumar PS, Pandit AB (1999) Modeling hydrodynamic cavitation. Chem Eng Technol 22:1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-4125(199912)22:12<1017::aid-ceat1017>3.0.co;2-l10.1002/(sici)1521-4125(199912)22:12<1017::aid-ceat1017>3.0.co;2-l ↗
18. Lacarte LMD, Fan J (2018) Modelling of a thermally activated building system (TABS) combined with free-hanging acoustic ceiling units using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Build Simul 11:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0392-x10.1007/s12273-017-0392-x ↗
19. Launder BE, Shima N (1989) Second-moment closure for the near-wall sublayer: development and application. AIAA J 27:1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.1026710.2514/3.10267 ↗
20. Lukman AI, Gong B, Marjo CE, Roessner U, Harris AT (2011) Facile synthesis, stabilization, and anti-bacterial performance of discrete Ag nanoparticles using Medicago sativa seed exudates. J Colloid Interface Sci 353:433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.08810.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.088 ↗
21. Moser WR, Find J, Emerson S, Krausz I, Kozyuk O (2000) Controlled flow hydrodynamic cavitation for the synthesis of advanced catalysts. Abstr Pap Am Chem S 219:U536–U536
22. Musmarra D, Prisciandaro M, Capocelli M, Karatza D, Iovino P, Canzano S, Lancia A (2016) Degradation of ibuprofen by hydrodynamic cavitation: reaction pathways and effect of operational parameters. Ultrason Sonochem 29:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.09.00210.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.09.002 ↗
23. Park KM, Yoon HS, Il Kim M (2018) CFD-DEM based numerical simulation of liquid-gas-particle mixture flow in dam break. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 59:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.11.01010.1016/j.cnsns.2017.11.010 ↗
24. Raut-Jadhav S, Saini D, Sonawane S, Pandit A (2016) Effect of process intensifying parameters on the hydrodynamic cavitation based degradation of commercial pesticide (methomyl) in the aqueous solution. Ultrason Sonochem 28:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.08.00410.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.08.004 ↗
25. Rigopoulos S (2010) Population balance modelling of polydispersed particles in reactive flows. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36:412–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.12.00110.1016/j.pecs.2009.12.001 ↗
26. Sajjadi S (2009) Population balance modeling of particle size distribution in monomer-starved semibatch emulsion polymerization. AIChE J 55:3191–3205. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.1191710.1002/aic.11917 ↗
27. Salehi F, Cleary MJ, Masri AR (2017) Population balance equation for turbulent polydispersed inertial droplets and particles. J Fluid Mech 831:719–742. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.65310.1017/jfm.2017.653 ↗
28. Sharma A, Gogate PR, Mahulkar A, Pandit AB (2008) Modeling of hydrodynamic cavitation reactors based on orifice plates considering hydrodynamics and chemical reactions occurring in bubble. Chem Eng J 143:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.04.00510.1016/j.cej.2008.04.005 ↗
29. Vale HM, McKenna TF (2005) Modeling particle size distribution in emulsion polymerization reactors. Prog Polym Sci 30:1019–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2005.06.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2005.06.006 ↗
30. van Embden J, Sader JE, Davidson M, Mulvaney P (2009) Evolution of colloidal nanocrystals: theory and modeling of their nucleation and growth. J Phys Chem C 113:16342–16355. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp902767310.1021/jp9027673 ↗
31. Williams FA (1958) Spray combustion and atomisation. Phys Fluids 6:541–54510.1063/1.1724379 ↗
32. Wu CD, Zhang ZL, Wu Y, Wang L, Chen LJ (2015) Effects of operating parameters and additives on degradation of phenol in water by the combination of H2O2 and hydrodynamic cavitation. Desalin Water Treat 53:462–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.84623410.1080/19443994.2013.846234 ↗
33. Yang N, Wang W, Ge W, Li JH (2003) CFD simulation of concurrent-up gas-solid flow in circulating fluidized beds with structure-dependent drag coefficient. Chem Eng J 96:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.00610.1016/j.cej.2003.08.006 ↗
34. Zhi J, Jie S, Lu Z (2017) Bivariate Taylor-series expansion method of moment for particle population balance equation in Brownian coagulation. J Aerosol Sci 114:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.08.01010.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.08.010 ↗
35. Zhu M-f, Miao X-J, Deng C, Xie W, Su H-b, You X-d, Chen P (2012) Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic cavitation effect of orifice plate with different layout. Light Ind Mach 30:8–11. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2895.2012.04.00310.3969/j.issn.1005-2895.2012.04.003 ↗