Experimental evidence for simultaneous relaxation processes in super spin glass γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticle system
Source abstract
Abstract
Spherical γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with the narrow size distribution of (5 ± 1) nm were synthesized by the method of thermal decomposition from iron acetyl acetonate precursor. The existence of super spin-glass state at low temperatures and in low applied magnetic fields was confirmed by DC magnetization measurements on a SQUID magnetometer. The comprehensive investigation of magnetic relaxation dynamics in low-temperature region was conducted through the measurements of single-stop and multiple stop ZFC memory effects, ZFC magnetization relaxation, and AC susceptibility measurements. The experimental findings revealed the peculiar change of magnetic relaxation dynamics at T ≈ 10 K, which arose as a consequence of simultaneous existence of different relaxation processes in Fe2O3 nanoparticle system. Complementarity of the applied measurements was utilized in order to single out distinct relaxation processes as well as to elucidate complex relaxation mechanisms in the investigated interacting nanoparticle system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Andra W, Nowak H (1998) Magnetism in medicine. Wiley-VCH, Berlin
2. Balanda M (2003) Dynamic Susceptibility of magnetic systems. In: Haase W, Wrobel S (eds) Relaxation phenomena: liquid crystals, magnetic systems, polymers, high-Tc superconductors, metallic glasses. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–11110.1007/978-3-662-09747-2_3 ↗
3. Bate G (1991) Magnetic recording materials since 1975. J Magn Magn Mater 100:413–424. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(91)90831-T10.1016/0304-8853(91)90831-T ↗
4. Berthier L, Bouchaud J-P (2002) Geometrical aspects of aging and rejuvenation in the Ising spin glass: a numerical study. Phys Rev B. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054404
5. Billotey C, Wilhelm C, Devaud M, Bacri JC, Bittoun J, Gazeau F (2003) Cell internalization of anionic maghemite nanoparticles: quantitative effect on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 49(4):646–654. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1041810.1002/mrm.10418 ↗
6. Bossmann S, Chikan V, Dani RK (2014) Biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanodevices. In: Li J, Wu N (eds) Biosensing and cancer treatment with magnetic nanoparticles. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 397–432
7. Bronstein LM, Huang X, Retrum J, Schmucker A, Pink M, Stein BD, Dragnea B (2007) Influence of iron oleate complex structure on iron oxide nanoparticle formation. Chem Mater 19:3624–3632. doi: 10.1021/cm062948j10.1021/cm062948j ↗
8. Cabot A, Alivisatos AP, Puntes VF, Balcells LI, Iglesias O, Labarta A (2009) Magnetic domains and surface effects in hollow maghemite nanoparticles. Phys Rev B. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094419
9. Cole KS, Cole RH (1941) Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics. J Chem Phys 9:341. doi: 10.1063/1.175090610.1063/1.1750906 ↗
10. Cornell RM, Schwertmann U (2003) The iron oxides—structure, properties, reactions, Occurences and Uses. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim10.1002/3527602097 ↗
11. De Toro JA, Lee SS, Salazar D, Cheong JL, Normile PS, Muniz P, Riveiro JM, Hillenkamp M, Tournus F, Tamion A, Nordblad P (2013) A nanoparticle replica of the spin-glass state. Appl Phys Lett 102:183104. doi: 10.1063/1.480418710.1063/1.4804187 ↗
12. Fisher DS, Huse DA (1986) Ordered phase of short-range Ising spin-glasses. Phys Rev Lett 56:1601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.160110.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1601 ↗
13. Fisher DS, Huse DA (1988) Equilibrium behavior of the spin-glass ordered phase. Phys Rev B 38:386. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.38610.1103/PhysRevB.38.386 ↗
14. Gossuin Y, Gillis P, Hocq A, Vuong QL, Roch A (2009) Magnetic resonance relaxation properties of superparamagnetic particles. Wires Nanomed Nanobi 1:299–310. doi: 10.1002/wnan.03610.1002/wnan.36 ↗
15. Gotić M, Koščec G, Musić S (2009) Study of the reduction and reoxidation of substoichiometric magnetite. J Mol Struct 924–926:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2008.10.04810.1016/j.molstruc.2008.10.048 ↗
16. Guardia P, Batlle-Brugal B, Roca AG, Iglesias O, Morales MP, Serna CJ, Labarta A, Batlle X (2007) Surfactant effects in monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles of controlled size. J Magn Magn Mater 316:756. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.08510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.085 ↗
17. Hafeli U, Schutt W, Teller J, Zboraski M (1997) Scientific and clinical applications of magnetic carriers. Plenum Press, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-6482-6 ↗
18. Hao T, Riman RE (2006) Calculation of interparticle spacing in colloidal systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 297:374–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.01410.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.014 ↗
19. Hibst H (1988) Magnetic pigments for recording information. J Magn Magn Mater 74(2):193–202. doi: 10.1016/0304-8853(88)90068-610.1016/0304-8853(88)90068-6 ↗
20. Ibrahim MM, Darwish S, Seehra (1995) Nonlinear temperature variation of magnetic viscosity in nanoscale FeOOH particles. Phys Rev B 51:2955. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.295510.1103/PhysRevB.51.2955 ↗
21. Ishii M, Nakahira M, Yamanaka T (1972) Infrared absorption spectra and cation distributions in (Mn, Fe)3O4. Solid State Commun 11:209–21210.1016/0038-1098(72)91162-3 ↗
22. Jönsson PE, Mathieu R, Nordblad P, Yoshino H, Katori HA, Ito A (2004) Nonequilibrium dynamics of spin glasses: examination of the ghost domain scenario. Phys Rev B 70:174402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.17440210.1103/PhysRevB.70.174402 ↗
23. Jönsson PE, Yoshino H, Mamiya H, Takayama H (2005) Absence of strong rejuvenation in superspin glass. Phys Rev B 71:104404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.10440410.1103/PhysRevB.71.104404 ↗
24. Kumar C, Mohammad F (2011) Magnetic nanomaterials for hyperthermia-based therapy and controlled drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:789–808. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.00810.1016/j.addr.2011.03.008 ↗
25. Lin-Vien D, Colthup NB, Fateley WG, Grasselli JG (1991) The handbook of infrared and raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. Academic Press, San Deigo, p 141
26. Lundgren L, Svedlindh P, Nordblad P, Beckman O (1983) Dynamics of the relaxation-time spectrum in a CuMn spin-glass. Phys Rev Lett 51:911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.91110.1103/PhysRevLett.51.911 ↗
27. Markovich V, Fita I, Wisniewski A, Jung G, Mogilyanski D, Puzniak R, Titelman L, Gorodetsky G (2010) Spin-glass-like properties of La0.8Ca0.2MnO3 nanoparticles ensembles. Phys Rev B 81:134440. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.13444010.1103/PhysRevB.81.134440 ↗
28. Mathieu R, Jönsson PE, Nordblad P, Katori HA, Ito A (2001) Memory and chaos in an Ising spin glass. Phys Rev B 65:012411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.01241110.1103/PhysRevB.65.012411 ↗
29. Mørup S, Bødker F, Hendriksen PV, Linderoth S (1995) Spin-glass-like ordering of the magnetic moments of interacting nanosized maghemite particles. Phys Rev B 52:287. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.28710.1103/PhysRevB.52.287 ↗
30. Mydosh J (1983) Spin glasses: an experimental introduction. Taylor and Francis, London
31. Osth M, Herisson D, Nordblad P, De Toro JA, Riveiro JM (2007) Ageing and memory effects in a mechanically alloyed nanoparticle system. J Magn Magn Mater 313:373–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.00610.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.006 ↗
32. Perlstein B, Ram Z, Daniels D, Ocherashvilli A, Roth Y, Margel S, Mardor Y (2008) Convection-enhanced delivery of maghemite nanoparticles: increased efficacy and MRI monitoring. Neuro Oncol 10(2):153–161. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-0010.1215/15228517-2008-002 ↗
33. Perovic M, Mrakovic A, Kusigerski V, Blanusa J, Spasojevic V (2011) Spin-glass dynamics in interacting nanoparticle system La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 obtained by mechanochemical milling. J Nanopart Res 13:6805. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0588-410.1007/s11051-011-0588-4 ↗
34. Perovic M, Mrakovic A, Kusigerski V, Blanusa J, Spasojevic V (2012) Relaxation phenomena in super spin glass nanoparticle manganite La0.7Ca0.3MnO3. Mater Chem Phys 136:196. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.05210.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.052 ↗
35. Perovic M, Kusigerski V, Spasojevic V, Mrakovic A, Blanusa J, Zentkova M, Mihalik M (2013) An ac susceptibility study of spin dynamics in a super spin glass nanoparticle system: simultaneous relaxation processes. J Phys D Appl Phys. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/46/16/165001
36. Petracic O, Sahoo S, Binek Ch, Kleemann W, Sousa JB, Cardoso S, Freitas PP (2003) Cole–Cole analysis of the superspin glass system Co80Fe20/Al2O3. Phase Transit 76:367–375. doi: 10.1080/014115902100005142410.1080/0141159021000051424 ↗
37. Petracic O, Glatz A, Kleemann W (2004) Models for the magnetic ac susceptibility of granular superferromagnetic CoFe/Al2O3. Phys Rev B 70:214432. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.21443210.1103/PhysRevB.70.214432 ↗
38. Petracic O, Chen X, Bedanta S, Kleemann W, Sahoo S, Cardoso S, Freitas PP (2006) Collective states of interacting ferromagnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 300:192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.10.06110.1016/j.jmmm.2005.10.061 ↗
39. Sasaki M, Jönsson PE, Takayama H, Nordblad P (2004) Comment on ‘‘Memory effects in an interacting magnetic nanoparticle system’’. Phys Rev Lett 93(13):139701–139711. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.13970110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.139701 ↗
40. Serna CJ, Morales MP (2004) Maghemite (γ-Fe2O3): a versatile magnetic colloidal material. Surf Colloid Sci 17:27–81. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9122-5_210.1007/978-1-4419-9122-5_2 ↗
41. Soler MAG, Alcantara GB, Soares FQ, Viali WR, Sartoratto PPC, Fernandez JRL, Silva SW, Garg VK, Oliveira AC, Morais PC (2007) Study of molecular surface coating on the stability of maghemite nanoparticles. Surf Sci 601:3921–3925. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.04.02910.1016/j.susc.2007.04.029 ↗
42. Sun C, Lee JSH, Zhang M (2008) Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1252–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.01810.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018 ↗
43. Suzuki M, Fullem SI, Suzuki IS, Wang L, Zhong CJ (2009) Observation of superspin-glass behavior in Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Phys Rev B. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.024418
44. Thuan NC, Nam DNH, Phuc NX, Thi N, Mai Y, Hong LV, Dai NV, Lam VD, Lee YP (2009) Magnetic memory effect in a strong phase competition system La0.7Ca0.3Mn0.925Ti0.075O3. J Phys Conf Ser. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/187/1/012068
45. Vincent E (2007) Ageing and the glass transition. In: Henkel M, Pleimling M, Sanctuary R (eds) Lecture notes in physics, vol 716. Springer, Berlin
46. Vincent E, Hammann J, Ocio M, Bouchaud JP, Cugliandolo L (1996) Complex behaviour of glassy systems. In: Rubi M (ed) Lecture notes in physics, vol 492. Springer, Berlin
47. Wegner LE (1983) Relaxation effects in spin glasses around the freezing temperature. In: Araki H (ed) Heidelberg colloquium on spin glasses. Springer, Berlin, pp 60–69
48. Xie J, Peng S, Brower N, Pourmand N, Wang SX, Sun S (2006) One-pot synthesis of monodisperse iron oxide nanoparticles for potential biomedical applications. Pure Appl Chem 78(5):1003–1014. doi: 10.1351/pac20067805100310.1351/pac200678051003 ↗