journal article·2023-12

Arc discharge sputtering of NiO-C electrodes: Structure and magnetic properties of synthesized materials

Alexey Zaikovsky, Nikolay Leonov, Arina Ukhina

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 25· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Plasma-chemical processes occurring during arc discharge sputtering of electrodes consisting of graphite and nickel oxide lead to the formation of a composite nanomaterial containing core–shell Ni@C nanoparticles. The structure of the formed material depends on the initial pressure in the reactor chamber. The smallest nickel nanoparticles with an average size of 3 nm are formed at a pressure of 12 Torr. The use of both lower 3 Torr and higher 100 Torr pressures results in the formation of larger nickel nanoparticles with average sizes of 5 and 9 nm, respectively. The proposed mechanism for the synthesis of Ni@C structures in the process of the arc discharge, including the stages of formation of a gas-plasma mixture, its outflow into the reactor chamber and cooling, processes of condensation, crystallization, and formation of nanoparticles, is considered. The structure of the material formed on a graphite substrate at various distances from the arc discharge axis was studied. It was established that larger nickel nanoparticles were formed at a closer distance, while the carbon component took the form of a graphene structure. With distance from the discharge, the size of the formed nickel nanoparticles decreased, and the graphene structure acquired a larger number of defects. Studies have showed that the synthesized materials, in terms of the mass content of nickel, had a specific magnetic susceptibility that exceeded the value for bulk metallic nickel. It was established that a decrease in the size of nickel nanoparticles led to an increase in the specific magnetic susceptibility of the material.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang X, Sun L, Yu Y, Zhao Y (2019) Flexible ferrofluids: design and applications. Adv Mater 31:1903497. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190349710.1002/adma.201903497 ↗
2. Stueber DD, Villanova J, Aponte I, Xiao Z, Colvin VL (2021) Magnetic nanoparticles in biology and medicine: past, present, and future trends. Pharmaceutics 13(7):943. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1307094310.3390/pharmaceutics13070943 ↗
3. Wahsner J, Gale EM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, Caravan P (2019) Chemistry of MRI contrast agents: current challenges and new frontiers. Chem Rev 119:957–1057. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0036310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00363 ↗
4. Rizvi SA, Saleh AM (2018) Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology. Saudi Pharm J 26:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2017.10.01210.1016/j.jsps.2017.10.012 ↗
5. Silva PL, Savchuk OA, Gallo J, García-Hevia L, Bañobre-LópezM NJB (2020) Mapping intracellular thermal response of cancer cells to magnetic hyperthermia treatment. Nanoscale 12:21647–21656. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR10370H10.1039/C9NR10370H ↗
6. Anik MI, Hossain MK, Hossain I, Mahfuz AMUB, Rahman MT, Ahmed I (2021) Recent progress of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications: a review. Nano Sel 2:1146–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.20200016210.1002/nano.202000162 ↗
7. Kianfar E (2021) Magnetic nanoparticles in targeted drug delivery: a review. J Supercond Nov Magn 34:1709–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-021-05932-910.1007/s10948-021-05932-9 ↗
8. Amiri M, Salavati-Niasari M, Akbari M (2019) Magnetic nanocarriers: evolution of spinel ferrites for medical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 265:29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.01.00310.1016/j.cis.2019.01.003 ↗
9. Aslam H, Shukrullah S, YasinNaz M, Fatima H, Hussain H, Ullah S, Assiri MA (2022) Current and future perspectives of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles based controlled drug delivery systems. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 67:102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10294610.1016/j.jddst.2021.102946 ↗
10. Grill A (2003) Diamond-like carbon coatings as biocompatible materials—an overview. Diam Rel Mat 12(2):166–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-9635(03)00018-910.1016/S0925-9635(03)00018-9 ↗
11. Thomson LA, Law FC, Rushton N, Franks J (1991) Biocompatibility of diamond-like carbon coating. Biomaterials 12(1):37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90129-X10.1016/0142-9612(91)90129-X ↗
12. Pinto AM, Gonçalves IS, Magalhães FD (2013) Graphene-based materials biocompatibility: a review. Colloids Surf B 111:188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.02210.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.022 ↗
13. Zhang X, Hao L, Wang H et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of superparamagnetic Fe3O4/CNTs nanocomposites dual-drug carrier. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mat Sci Edit 32:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-017-1555-410.1007/s11595-017-1555-4 ↗
14. Yan A, Lau BW, Weissman BS, Kulaots I, Yang NYC, Kane AB, Hurt RH (2006) Biocompatible, hydrophilic supramolecular carbon nanoparticles for cell delivery. AdvMater 18:2373–2378. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060083810.1002/adma.200600838 ↗
15. Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23(6):815–850. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.59785410.1118/1.597854 ↗
16. Novopashin SA, Serebryakova MA, Khmel SY (2015) Methods of magnetic fluid synthesis (review). Thermophys Aeromech 22:397–412. https://doi.org/10.1134/S086986431504001010.1134/S0869864315040010 ↗
17. Joseph A, Mathew S (2014) Ferrofluids: synthetic strategies, stabilization, physicochemical features, characterization, and applications. Chem Plus Chem 79(10):1382–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.20140220210.1002/cplu.201402202 ↗
18. Fang C, Nasir I, Xiaobing L, Zhenggui L, Shengnan Y, Hao F (2021) Size effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on magnetism and dispersion stability of magnetic nanofluid. Front Energy Res 9:780008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.78000810.3389/fenrg.2021.780008 ↗
19. Li Q, Kartikowati CW, Horie S et al (2017) Correlation between particle size/domain structure and magnetic properties of highly crystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Sci Rep 7:9894. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09897-510.1038/s41598-017-09897-5 ↗
20. Sung Lee J, Myung Cha J, Young Yoon H et al (2015) Magnetic multi-granule nanoclusters: a model system that exhibits universal size effect of magnetic coercivity. Sci Rep 5:12135. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1213510.1038/srep12135 ↗
21. Akbarzadeh A, Samiei M, Davaran S (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, physical properties, and applications in biomedicine. Nanoscale Res Lett 7:144. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-7-14410.1186/1556-276X-7-144 ↗
22. Maaz K, Mumtaz A, Hasanain SK, Ceylan A (2007) Synthesis and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles prepared by wet chemical route. J Magn Magn Mater 308(2):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.06.00310.1016/j.jmmm.2006.06.003 ↗
23. Liuv H, Li A, Ding X, Yang F, Sun K (2019) Magnetic induction heating properties of Mg1-xZnxFe2O4 ferrites synthesized by co-precipitation method. Solid State Sci 93:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.05.00510.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.05.005 ↗
24. Zhang H, Zhu G (2012) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles immobilized on polyamide fabric. Appl Surf Sci 258(11):4952–4959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.12710.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.127 ↗
25. Kubíčková L, Koktan J, Kořínková T, Klementová M, Kmječ T, Kohout J, Weidenkaff A, Kaman O (2020) Zn-substituted iron oxide nanoparticles from thermal decomposition and their thermally treated derivatives for magnetic solid-phase extraction. J Magn Magn Mater 498:166083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16608310.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166083 ↗
26. Lee YJ, Kim K, Shin IS et al (2020) Antioxidative metallic copper nanoparticles prepared by modified polyol method and their catalytic activities. J Nanopart Res 22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4727-710.1007/s11051-019-4727-7 ↗
27. Zaikovskii AV, Iurchenkova AA, Kozlachkov DV, Fedorovskaya EO (2021) Effects of Tin on the morphological and electrochemical properties of arc-discharge nanomaterials. JOM 73:847–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04556-z10.1007/s11837-020-04556-z ↗
28. Zaikovskii AV, Kardash TY, Kolesov BA, Nikolaeva OA (2019) Graphene, SiC and Si nanostructures synthesis during quartz pyrolysis in arc-discharge plasma. Phys Stat Sol A 216:1900079. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20190007910.1002/pssa.201900079 ↗
29. Zaikovskii A, Yudin I, Kozlachkov D, Nartova A, Fedorovskaya E (2022) Gas pressure control of electric arc synthesis of composite Sn-SnO2-C nanomaterials. Vacuum 195:110694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.11069410.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110694 ↗
30. Zaikovskii A, Ukhina A, Mateyshina Y (2022) Electric arc synthesis of composite Ni-C, NiO-C nanomaterials: structure and electrochemical properties. Phys Stat Sol A 219:2200111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20220011110.1002/pssa.202200111 ↗
31. Kundrapu M, Keidar M (2012) Numerical simulation of carbon arc discharge for nanoparticle synthesis. Phys Plasmas 19(7):073510. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473715310.1063/1.4737153 ↗
32. Langmuir I (1932) Evaporation, condensation and adsorption. J Am ChemSoc 54(7):2798–2832. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01346a02210.1021/ja01346a022 ↗
33. Alekseyev NI, Dyuzhev GA (2008) Fullerene formation in an arc discharge. Carbon 41(7):1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00058-710.1016/S0008-6223(03)00058-7 ↗
34. Sukhinin GI, Nerushev OA (1997) A model for the formation of fullerenes in carbon vapor. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 38:625–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0246810810.1007/BF02468108 ↗
35. Zaikovskii A, Novopashin S, Maltsev V, Kardash T, Shundrina I (2019) Tin-carbon nanomaterial formation in a helium atmosphere during arc-discharge. RSC Adv 9:36621–36630. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA05485E10.1039/C9RA05485E ↗
36. Magnin Y, Zappelli A, Amara H, Ducastelle F, Bichara C (2015) Size dependent phase diagrams of nickel-carbon nanoparticles. Phys Rev Let 115(20):205502. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.115.20550210.1103/physrevlett.115.205502 ↗
37. Zaikovskii AV, Novopashin SA (2017) Electroconductive and magnetic properties of pure carbon soot produced in arc discharge: regimes of various buffer gas pressure. Phys Stat Sol A 214:1700142. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20170014210.1002/pssa.201700142 ↗
38. Owens FJ, Iqbal Z, Belova L, Rao KV (2004) Evidence for high-temperature ferromagnetism in photolyzed C60. Phys Rev B 69:033403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.03340310.1103/PhysRevB.69.033403 ↗
39. G de Oteyza D, Frederiksen T (2022) Carbon-based nanostructures as a versatile platform for tunable π-magnetism. J Phys Condens Matter 34(44):35977474.https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac8a7f10.1088/1361-648X/ac8a7f ↗
40. Ranade V, Gautam S, Chae KH (2023) Magnetism in carbon-based fiber materials. J Magn Magn Mater 586:171210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17121010.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171210 ↗