Polyvinyl chloride grounded cobalt molybdophosphate nanocomposite membrane: comparative study of fixed charge density
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-derived cobalt molybdophosphate (CMP) nanocomposite material was synthesized by sol-gel technique. The physico-chemical properties such as composition, functional groups, thermal stability, phase transition, and surface structure were characterized using TGA, FT-IR, SEM, and TEM analyses. Membranes from the nanocomposite material were prepared to elucidate the electrochemical properties. The ionic potential was measured using strong electrolytes such as KCl, NaCl, and LiCl. Electrolytes have the following cation-sequenced with observed membrane potentials Li+ > Na+ > K+. The estimated membrane charge density was calculated for membrane performance. Membrane characteristics, such as transport number, mobility ratio, and charge efficiency, were determined using the Teorell–Meyer–Sievers (TMS) theory framework. LiCl has the highest value of t+ and (overline{omega}). The nanocomposite membrane is lithium cation-selective, which can, therefore, be effectively utilized in various electro-membrane processes such as lithium-ion extraction and removal.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang R, Liu Y, He M et al (2016) Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: strategies and mechanisms. Chem Soc Rev 45:5888–5924. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00579E10.1039/C5CS00579E ↗
2. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M et al (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452(7185):301–310. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0659910.1038/nature06599 ↗
3. Kim S, Nam S-N, Jang A et al (2022) Review of adsorption–membrane hybrid systems for water and wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 286:131916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13191610.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131916 ↗
4. Shahzaib A, Shaily AI et al (2023) Ultrarapid and highly efficient reduction of nitroaromatic compounds using cyclodextrin MOF. Catal Commun 174:106569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2022.10656910.1016/j.catcom.2022.106569 ↗
5. Shahzaib A, Shaily AI et al (2023) One pot synthesis of cyclodextrin MOF as a promising heterogeneous catalyst for the reduction of nitroaromatic compounds and azo dyes. Res Chem Intermed. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-023-04986-910.1007/s11164-023-04986-9 ↗
6. Rivera-Utrilla J, Sánchez-Polo M, Gómez-Serrano V et al (2011) Activated carbon modifications to enhance its water treatment applications. . An overview. J Hazard Mater 187:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.03310.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.033 ↗
7. Ju X-J, Zhang S-B, Zhou M-Y et al (2009) Novel heavy-metal adsorption material: ion-recognition P(NIPAM-co-BCAm) hydrogels for removal of lead(II) ions. J Hazard Mater 167:114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.08910.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.089 ↗
8. Meena AK, Mishra GK, Rai PK et al (2005) Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using carbon aerogel as an adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 122:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.02410.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.024 ↗
9. Boivin MJ, Giordani B (1995) A risk evaluation of the neuropsychological effects of childhood lead toxicity. Dev Neuropsychol 11:157–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/8756564950954061110.1080/87565649509540611 ↗
10. Blöcher C, Dorda J, Mavrov V et al (2003) Hybrid flotation—membrane filtration process for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Water Res 37:4018–4026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00314-210.1016/S0043-1354(03)00314-2 ↗
11. Werber JR, Osuji CO, Elimelech M (2016) Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat Rev Mater 1:16018. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1810.1038/natrevmats.2016.18 ↗
12. Elimelech M, Phillip WA (2011) The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333:712–717. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.120048810.1126/science.1200488 ↗
13. Tang Y, Cai Z, Sun X et al (2022) Electrospun nanofiber-based membranes for water treatment. Polymers (Basel) 14:2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1410200410.3390/polym14102004 ↗
14. Fernandez-Gonzalez C, Dominguez-Ramos A, Ibañez R, Irabien A (2019) Desalination by renewable energy-powered electrodialysis processes. In: Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes. Elsevier, pp 111–13110.1016/B978-0-12-813545-7.00005-2 ↗
15. Semiat R (2008) Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ Sci Technol 42:8193–8201. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801330u10.1021/es801330u ↗
16. Baker RW (2012) Membrane technology and applications. Wiley10.1002/9781118359686 ↗
17. Gin DL, Noble RD (2011) Designing the next generation of chemical separation membranes. Science 332:674–676. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.120377110.1126/science.1203771 ↗
18. Larbot A, Fabre JP, Guizard C, Cot L (1988) Inorganic membranes obtained by sol-gel techniques. J Memb Sci 39:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80929-110.1016/S0376-7388(00)80929-1 ↗
19. Rodriguez JA, Hanson JC, Chaturvedi S et al (2000) Studies on the behavior of mixed-metal oxides: structural, electronic, and chemical properties of β-FeMoO 4. J Phys Chem B 104:8145–8152. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp001652c10.1021/jp001652c ↗
20. Cao B, Veith GM, Diaz RE et al (2013) Cobalt molybdenum oxynitrides: synthesis, structural characterization, and catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew Chemie Int Ed 52:10753–10757. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20130319710.1002/anie.201303197 ↗
21. Rodriguez JA, Chaturvedi S, Hanson JC, Brito JL (1999) Reaction of H 2 and H 2 S with CoMoO 4 and NiMoO 4 : TPR, XANES, time-resolved XRD, and molecular-orbital studies. J Phys Chem B 103:770–781. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp983115m10.1021/jp983115m ↗
22. Ertl G, Knözinger H, Weitkamp J (1997) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. Wiley10.1002/9783527619474 ↗
23. Haber J (1974) Cobalt and other transition metal molybdate catalysts. J Less Common Met 36:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(74)90112-X10.1016/0022-5088(74)90112-X ↗
24. Allulli S, Ferragina C, La GA et al (1977) Ion-exchange mechanism of some bivalent transition-metal ions on half-converted sodium and lithium forms of crystalline zirconium phosphate. J Chem Soc Dalt Trans 1879. https://doi.org/10.1039/dt977000187910.1039/dt9770001879 ↗
25. Imteyaz S, Rafiuddin R (2015) Effects of monovalent ions on membrane potential and permselectivity: evaluation of fixed charge density of polymer based zirconium aluminophosphate nanocomposite membrane. RSC Adv 5:96008–96018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA17193H10.1039/C5RA17193H ↗
26. Nabi SA, Akhtar A, Khan MDA, Khan MA (2014) Synthesis, characterization and electrical conductivity of Polyaniline-Sn(IV)tungstophosphate hybrid cation exchanger: analytical application for removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Desalination 340:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.02010.1016/j.desal.2014.02.020 ↗
27. Shim J, Ha HY, Hong S-A, Oh I-H (2002) Characteristics of the Nafion ionomer-impregnated nanocomposite membrane for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Power Sources 109:412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00106-410.1016/S0378-7753(02)00106-4 ↗
28. Nabi SA, Naushad M (2008) Synthesis, characterization and analytical applications of a new nanocomposite cation exchanger cellulose acetate-Zr(IV) molybdophosphate. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 316:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.09.00510.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.09.005 ↗
29. Kim YS, Wang F, Hickner M et al (2003) Fabrication and characterization of heteropolyacid (H3PW12O40)/directly polymerized sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) copolymer nanocomposite membranes for higher temperature fuel cell applications. J Memb Sci 212:263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00507-010.1016/S0376-7388(02)00507-0 ↗
30. Tchicaya-Bouckary L, Jones DJ, Rozière J (2002) Hybrid polyaryletherketone membranes for fuel cell applications. Fuel Cells 2:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-6854(20020815)2:1<40::AID-FUCE40>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/1615-6854(20020815)2:1<40::AID-FUCE40>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
31. Blöcher C, Noronha M, Fünfrocken L et al (2002) Recycling of spent process water in the food industry by an integrated process of biological treatment and membrane separation. Desalination 144:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00303-X10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00303-X ↗
32. Côté P, Mourato D, Güngerich C et al (1998) Immersed membrane filtration for the production of drinking water: case studies. Desalination 117:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00090-310.1016/S0011-9164(98)00090-3 ↗
33. Bowen WR, Mohammad AW, Hilal N (1997) Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes — use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J Memb Sci 126:91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00276-110.1016/S0376-7388(96)00276-1 ↗
34. Bowen WR, Welfoot JS (2002) Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation. Desalination 147:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00534-910.1016/S0011-9164(02)00534-9 ↗
35. Navarro R, González MP, Saucedo I et al (2008) Effect of an acidic treatment on the chemical and charge properties of a nanofiltration membrane. J Memb Sci 307:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.01510.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.015 ↗
36. Szymczyk A, Fievet P, Mullet M et al (1998) Comparison of two electrokinetic methods – electroosmosis and streaming potential – to determine the zeta-potential of plane ceramic membranes. J Memb Sci 143:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00340-210.1016/S0376-7388(97)00340-2 ↗
37. Takagi R, Nakagaki M (1990) Theoretical study of the effect of ion adsorption on membrane potential and its application to collodion membranes. J Memb Sci 53:19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(90)80003-510.1016/0376-7388(90)80003-5 ↗
38. Levenstein R (1996) Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes. J Memb Sci 116:77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00029-410.1016/0376-7388(96)00029-4 ↗
39. Bowen WR, Welfoot JS (2002) Modelling of membrane nanofiltration—pore size distribution effects. Chem Eng Sci 57:1393–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00412-210.1016/S0009-2509(01)00412-2 ↗
40. Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Al-Zoubib H et al (2007) Modelling the effects of nanofiltration membrane properties on system cost assessment for desalination applications. Desalination 206:215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.06810.1016/j.desal.2006.02.068 ↗
41. Barragán VM, Pérez-Haro MJ (2011) Correlations between water uptake and effective fixed charge concentration at high univalent electrolyte concentrations in sulfonated polymer cation-exchange membranes with different morphology. Electrochim Acta 56:8630–8637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.07.06010.1016/j.electacta.2011.07.060 ↗
42. Westermann-Clark GB, Christoforou CC (1986) The exclusion-diffusion potential in charged porous membranes. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 198:213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(86)90001-X10.1016/0022-0728(86)90001-X ↗
43. Hickner MA, Ghassemi H, Kim YS et al (2004) Alternative polymer systems for proton exchange membranes (PEMs). Chem Rev 104:4587–4612. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020711a10.1021/cr020711a ↗
44. Chung T-S, Jiang LY, Li Y, Kulprathipanja S (2007) Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 32:483–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008 ↗
45. Tasaka M, Aoki N, Kondo Y, Nagasawa M (1975) Membrane potentials and electrolyte permeation velocities in charged membranes. J Phys Chem 79:1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100580a01710.1021/j100580a017 ↗
46. Kamo N, Oikawa M, Kobatake Y (1973) Effective fixed charge density governing membrane phenomena. V. Reduced expression of permselectivity. J Phys Chem 77:92–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100620a02010.1021/j100620a020 ↗
47. Nagasawa M, Kobatake Y (1952) The theory of membrane potential. J Phys Chem 56:1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150500a02410.1021/j150500a024 ↗
48. Kobatake Y (1958) Irreversible electrochemical processes of membranes. J Chem Phys 28:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.174405710.1063/1.1744057 ↗
49. Hou J-F, Gao J-F, Kong L-B (2020) Boosting the performance of cobalt molybdate nanorods by introducing nanoflake-like cobalt boride to form a heterostructure for aqueous hybrid supercapacitors. J Colloid Interface Sci 565:388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.01.04010.1016/j.jcis.2020.01.040 ↗
50. Jin X, Li J, Xue P, Jia M (2014) Preparation and characterization of PVC-based form-stable phase change materials. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 130:435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.07.01310.1016/j.solmat.2014.07.013 ↗
51. Janardhan E, Reddy MM, Reddy PV, Reddy MJ (2018) Synthesis of SnO nanoparticles—a hydrothermal approach. World J Nano Sci Eng 08:33–37. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnse.2018.8200210.4236/wjnse.2018.82002 ↗
52. Sharma S, Kothiyal NC, Rathore BS, Sharma S (2015) Use of cellulose acetate–tin (lV) phosphate nanocomposite (CA/TPC) in highly effective removal and recovery of heavy metal ions. Int J Ind Chem 6:43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40090-015-0031-210.1007/s40090-015-0031-2 ↗
53. Siddiqui WA, Khan SA (2007) Synthesis, characterization and ion exchange properties of zirconium(IV) tungstoiodophosphate, a new cation exchanger. Bull Mater Sci 30:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-007-0008-710.1007/s12034-007-0008-7 ↗
54. Semagne B, Diaz I, Kebede T, Taddesse AM (2016) Synthesis, characterization and analytical application of polyaniline tin(IV) molybdophosphate nanocomposite with nanocrystalline domains. React Funct Polym 98:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.11.00410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.11.004 ↗
55. Wan Y, Zhao (2007) On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates. Chem Rev 107:2821–2860. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068020s10.1021/cr068020s ↗
56. Li J, Zhang L, Yang P, Cheng X (2018) Morphological evolution of Co phosphate and its electrochemical and photocatalytic performance. CrystEngComm 20:6982–6988. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CE01535J10.1039/C8CE01535J ↗
57. Wang Y, Wang Y, Jiang R, Xu R (2012) Cobalt phosphate–ZnO nanocomposite photocatalysts for oxygen evolution from photocatalytic water oxidation. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:9945–9951. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202746910.1021/ie2027469 ↗
58. Liu R, Shi Y, Wan Y et al (2006) Triconstituent co-assembly to ordered mesostructured polymer−silica and carbon−silica nanonanocomposites and large-pore mesoporous carbons with high surface areas. J Am Chem Soc 128:11652–11662. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja063351810.1021/ja0633518 ↗
59. Sen T, Tiddy GJT, Casci JL, Anderson MW (2004) Synthesis and characterization of hierarchically ordered porous silica materials. Chem Mater 16:2044–2054. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm034946u10.1021/cm034946u ↗
60. Khan A, Khan A (2007) Preparation and characterization of a new organic–inorganic nano-nanocomposite poly-o-toluidine Th(IV) phosphate: its analytical applications as cation-exchanger and in making ion-selective electrode. Talanta 72:699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.11.04410.1016/j.talanta.2006.11.044 ↗
61. Titiloye JO, Hussain I (2008) Synthesis and characterization of silicalite-1/carbon-graphite membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 318:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.02510.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.025 ↗
62. Resina M, Macanás J, de Gyves J, Muñoz M (2007) Development and characterization of hybrid membranes based on an organic matrix modified with silanes for metal separation. J Memb Sci 289:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.04910.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.049 ↗
63. Imteyaz S (2016) Transport studies of ions across polystyrene based nanocomposite membrane: evaluation of fixed charge density using theoretical models. J Mol Struct 1123:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.06.02010.1016/j.molstruc.2016.06.020 ↗
64. Teorell T (1935) Studies on the “diffusion effect” upon ionic distribution. Some theoretical considerations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 21:152–161. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.21.3.15210.1073/pnas.21.3.152 ↗
65. Hall MS, Starov VM, Lloyd DR (1997) Reverse osmosis of multicomponent electrolyte solutions Part I. Theoretical development. J Memb Sci 128:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00300-610.1016/S0376-7388(96)00300-6 ↗
66. Beg M, Matin M (2002) Studies with nickel phosphate membranes: evaluation of charge density and test of recently developed theory of membrane potential. J Memb Sci 196:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00582-810.1016/S0376-7388(01)00582-8 ↗
67. Arfin T (2009) Transport studies of nickel arsenate membrane. J Electroanal Chem 636:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.09.01910.1016/j.jelechem.2009.09.019 ↗
68. Imteyaz S (2016) Synthesis of phosphonated poly(vinyl alcohol)-based nanocomposite membrane: effects of counter and co-ions on its electrochemical properties for separation applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:12655–12666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0338710.1021/acs.iecr.6b03387 ↗
69. Teixeira M, Rosa M, Nystrom M (2005) The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J Memb Sci 265:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.04610.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.046 ↗
70. Afonso MD, de Pinho MN (2000) Transport of MgSO4, MgCl2, and Na2SO4 across an amphoteric nanofiltration membrane. J Memb Sci 179:137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00495-610.1016/S0376-7388(00)00495-6 ↗
71. Peeters JMM, Mulder MHV, Strathmann H (1999) Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 150:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00828-010.1016/S0927-7757(98)00828-0 ↗
72. Klaysom C, Moon S-H, Ladewig BP et al (2011) The influence of inorganic filler nanoparticle size on nanocomposite ion-exchange membranes for desalination. J Phys Chem C 115:15124–15132. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp112157z10.1021/jp112157z ↗
73. Shahi VK, Thampy SK, Rangarajan R (1999) Studies on transport properties of surfactant immobilized anion-exchange membrane. J Memb Sci 158:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00029-010.1016/S0376-7388(99)00029-0 ↗
74. Benavente J, Cañas A (1999) Transport of NaNO3 solutions across an activated nanocomposite membrane: electrochemical and chemical surface characterizations. J Memb Sci 156:241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00348-210.1016/S0376-7388(98)00348-2 ↗
75. Mauro A (1962) Space charge regions in fixed charge membranes and the associated property of capacitance. Biophys J 2:179–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(62)86848-910.1016/S0006-3495(62)86848-9 ↗
76. Sasidhar V, Ruckenstein E (1982) Anomalous effects during electrolyte osmosis across charged porous membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 85:332–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(82)90003-010.1016/0021-9797(82)90003-0 ↗
77. Shang W-J, Wang X-L, Yu Y-X (2006) Theoretical calculation on the membrane potential of charged porous membranes in 1-1, 1-2, 2-1 and 2-2 electrolyte solutions. J Memb Sci 285:362–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.00510.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.005 ↗
78. Chou T-J, Tanioka A (1998) Membrane potential across charged membranes in organic solutions. J Phys Chem B 102:7198–7202. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp981673v10.1021/jp981673v ↗
79. Tanioka A, Matsumoto H, Yamamoto R (2004) Charge effectiveness of sulfonated polymer membranes under low-water-content condition. Sci Technol Adv Mater 5:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2004.01.01410.1016/j.stam.2004.01.014 ↗
80. Geise GM, Cassady HJ, Paul DR et al (2014) Specific ion effects on membrane potential and the permselectivity of ion exchange membranes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:21673–21681. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03076A10.1039/C4CP03076A ↗