journal article·2022-10

Melting characteristics and strain-based mechanical characterization of single metal nanoparticles

Peng Wu, Ying Yang

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the melting process of six single transition metal nanoparticles (radius of 2 nm) of Ag, Au, Co, Cu, Pd, and Pt was systematically investigated by molecular dynamics method. The melting points of these nanoparticles were determined by the variation curve of atomic average potential energy with temperature. The Honeycutt–Andersen (HA) index indicates that with increasing temperature, the six nanoparticles transformed from fcc structure to “others” structure types. With further increase in the temperature to the melting point of the nanoparticle, a sudden change in the structure was also observed. In addition, the melting process of nanoparticles was characterized by atomic local shear strain, indicating a clear dependence of atomic local shear strain on temperature. When the nanoparticles undergo solid–liquid phase transition, all atoms have high local shear strains with obvious local distortions and deformations.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Astruc D, Feng L, Aranzaes JR (2006) Nanoparticles as recyclable catalysts: the frontier between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. ChemInform 37:7852–7872. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.20060926110.1002/chin.200609261 ↗
2. Daniel MC, Astruc D (2004) Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 104(1):293–346. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030698+10.1021/cr030698+ ↗
3. Xu WL, Kong JS, Chen P (2009) Probing the catalytic activity and heterogeneity of Au-nanoparticles at the single-molecule level. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11(15):2767–2778. https://doi.org/10.1039/B820052A10.1039/B820052A ↗
4. Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2004) Shape-dependent catalytic activity of platinum nanoparticles in colloidal solution. Nano Lett 4(7):1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl049525610.1021/nl0495256 ↗
5. Bell AT (2003) The impact of nanoscience in heterogeneous catalysis. Science 299(5613):1688–1691. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108367110.1126/science.1083671 ↗
6. Ferrando R, Jellinek J, Johnston RL (2008) Nanoalloys: from theory to applications of alloy clusters and nanoparticles. Chem Rev 108(3):845–910. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040090g10.1021/cr040090g ↗
7. Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, EI-Sayed MA (2005) Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chemical Reviews 105(4):1025–1102. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030063a10.1021/cr030063a ↗
8. Even U, Ben-Horin N, Jortner J (1989) Multistate isomerization of size-selected clusters. Phys Rev Lett 62(2):140–143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.14010.1103/PhysRevLett.62.140 ↗
9. Martin TP (1996) Shells of atoms. Phys Rep 273(4):199–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(95)00083-610.1016/0370-1573(95)00083-6 ↗
10. Koppes JP, Muza AR, Stach EA, Handwerker CH (2010) Comment on “size-dependent melting properties of small tin particles: nanocalorimetric measurements.” Phys Rev Lett 104(18):189601–189601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.18960110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.189601 ↗
11. Bösiger J, Leutwyler S (1987) Surface-melting transitions and phase coexistence in argon solvent clusters. Phys Rev Lett 59(17):1895–1898. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.189510.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1895 ↗
12. Bulgac A, Lewenkopf C (1995) Temperature dependence of the optical response of small sodium clusters. Europhys Lett 31(9):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/31/9/00310.1209/0295-5075/31/9/003 ↗
13. Liu SH, Han MY (2010) Synthesis, functionalization, and bioconjugation of monodisperse, silica-coated gold nanoparticles: robust bioprobes. Adv Func Mater 15(6):961–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20040042710.1002/adfm.200400427 ↗
14. Sementa L, Barcaro G, Monti S, Carravetta V (2018) Molecular dynamics simulations of melting and sintering of Si nanoparticles: a comparison of different force fields and computational models[J]. Phys Chem Chem Phys-Cambridge-Royal Society of Chemistry 20(3):1707–1715. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP07583A10.1039/C7CP07583A ↗
15. Li G, Sui X, Ma Y, Wang K, Wang Q (2016) Structural transformation between bcc and fcc in Fe-Ni nanoparticle during heating process. Phys Lett A 380(42):3500–3504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.08.01910.1016/j.physleta.2016.08.019 ↗
16. Li ZH, Truhlar DG (2008) Nanosolids, slushes, and nanoliquids: characterization of nanophases in metal clusters and nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 130(38):12698–12711. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja802389d10.1021/ja802389d ↗
17. Rossi K, Pártay LB, Csányi G, Baletto F (2018) Thermodynamics of CuPt nanoalloys. Sci Rep 8:9150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27308-110.1038/s41598-018-27308-1 ↗
18. Hou M (2017) Solid-liquid and liquid-solid transitions in metal nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:5994–6005. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP08606C10.1039/C6CP08606C ↗
19. Daw MS (1984) Baskes MI (1984) Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Phys Rev B 29(12):6443–6453. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29.644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
20. Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS (1986) Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 33(12):7983–7991. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
21. Zhou XW, Johnson RA, Wadley HNG (2004) Misfit-energy-increasing dislocations in vapor-deposited CoFe/NiFe multilayers. Phys Rev B 69(14):144113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.14411310.1103/PhysRevB.69.144113 ↗
22. Mendelev MI, King AH (2013) The interactions of self-interstitials with twin boundaries. Phil Mag 93(10–12):1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2012.74701210.1080/14786435.2012.747012 ↗
23. Williams PL, Mishin Y, Hamilton JC (2006) An embedded-atom potential for the Cu-Ag system. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 14(5):817–833. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/14/5/00210.1088/0965-0393/14/5/002 ↗
24. Honeycutt JD, Andersen HC (1987) Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters. J Phys Chem 91(19):4950–4963. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100303a01410.1021/j100303a014 ↗
25. Xiong LH, Lou HB, Wang XD et al (2014) Evolution of local atomic structure during solidification of Al2Au liquid: an ab initio study. Acta Mater 68(15):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.00410.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.004 ↗
26. Chen SD, Soh AK, Ke FJ (2005) Molecular dynamics modeling of diffusion bonding. Scripta Mater 52(11):1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.004 ↗
27. Ganesh P, Widom M (2006) Signature of nearly icosahedral structures in liquid and supercooled liquid copper. Phys Rev B 74(13):2952–2961. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.13420510.1103/PhysRevB.74.134205 ↗
28. Shimizu F, Ogata S (2007) Li J (2007) Theory of shear banding in metallic glasses and molecular dynamics calculations. Mater Trans 48(11):2923–2927. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.mj20076910.2320/matertrans.mj200769 ↗
29. Ju SP, Lee IJ (2020) Chen HY (2020) Melting mechanism of Pt-Pd-Rh-Co high entropy alloy nanoparticle: an insight from molecular dynamics simulation[J]. J Alloy Compd 858:157681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15768110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157681 ↗