journal article·2017-11

Annealing or direct synthesis of uniform inorganic nanoparticles using salt powder as separation medium

Wytse Hooch Antink, Yejung Choi, Yuanzhe Piao

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 19· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Uniform nanoparticles have shown to hold great potential in many different fields. As a result, many resources have been devoted to the search for a general synthesis of uniform nanoparticles, which has led to the proliferation of solution-based methods. However, some of these techniques are inherently difficult to scale up and are unable to meet future industry needs. Additionally, since the synthesis temperature of these methods can only go as high as the evaporation point of the solvent, they are not compatible with the high temperatures required to obtain certain desired properties such as high crystallinity. Recently, solventless methods have gained considerable attention since they are relatively fast and require no expensive or toxic solvents. Inorganic salt powder can be used as separation medium to prevent aggregation and sintering by keeping the as-prepared nanoparticles or precursor materials physically separated. This review surveys the use of inorganic salts in solventless techniques for the annealing or direct synthesis of uniform nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Allain A, Kang J, Banerjee K, Kis A (2015) Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat Mater 14:1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat445210.1038/nmat4452 ↗
2. Al-Mamun M, Wang Y, Liu P et al (2016) One-step solid phase synthesis of a highly efficient and robust cobalt pentlandite electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 4:18314–18321. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA07962H10.1039/C6TA07962H ↗
3. Ayyappan S, Gopalan RS, Subbanna GN, Rao CNR (2017) Nanoparticles of Ag, Au, Pd, and Cu produced by alcohol reduction of the salts. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1997.005710.1557/JMR.1997.0057 ↗
4. Baláž P, Achimovičová M, Baláž M et al (2013) Hallmarks of mechanochemistry: from nanoparticles to technology. Chem Soc Rev 42:7571. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs35468g10.1039/c3cs35468g ↗
5. Billik P, Plesch G (2007) Mechanochemical synthesis of nanocrystalline TiO2 from liquid TiCl4. Scr Mater 56:979–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.048 ↗
6. Chen DH, Wu SH (2000) Synthesis of nickel nanoparticles in water-in-oil microemulsions. Chem Mater 12:1354–1360. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm991167y10.1021/cm991167y ↗
7. Chen J, Liu B, Liu Y et al (2015) Chemical vapor deposition of large-sized hexagonal WSe2 crystals on dielectric substrates. Adv Mater 27:6722–6727. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150344610.1002/adma.201503446 ↗
8. Choi E, Lee S, Piao Y (2015) A solventless mix–bake–wash approach to the facile controlled synthesis of core–shell and alloy ag–cu bimetallic nanoparticles. CrystEngComm 17:5940–5946. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE00670H10.1039/C5CE00670H ↗
9. Chu S, Yang C, Niu C et al (2014) Synthesis of Bi–Bi2O3/C hybrid nanocomposite as a high performance photocatalyst. Mater Lett 136:366–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.08010.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.080 ↗
10. Delattre A, Pouget S, Jacquot JF et al (2010) Stable colloidal solutions of high-temperature-annealed L1 FePt nanoparticles. Small 6:932–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20090180510.1002/smll.200901805 ↗
11. Dodd AC (2009) A comparison of mechanochemical methods for the synthesis of nanoparticulate nickel oxide. Powder Technol 196:30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.06.01410.1016/j.powtec.2009.06.014 ↗
12. Elkins K, Li D, Poudyal N et al (2005) Monodisperse face-centred tetragonal FePt nanoparticles with giant coercivity. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:2306–2309. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/14/00310.1088/0022-3727/38/14/003 ↗
13. Garcia-Peña NG, Redón R, Herrera-Gomez A et al (2015) Solventless synthesis of ruthenium nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 340:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.18610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.186 ↗
14. He C, Wu S, Zhao N et al (2013) Carbon-encapsulated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a high-rate lithium ion battery anode material. ACS Nano 4459–4469. https://doi.org/10.1021/Nn401059h10.1021/Nn401059h ↗
15. Hoefelmeyer JD, Liu H, Somorjai GA, Tilley TD (2007) Reverse micelle synthesis of rhodium nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 309:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.06010.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.060 ↗
16. Huang Y, Pan Q, Wang H et al (2016) Preparation of a Sn@SnO2@C@MoS2 composite as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:7185–7189. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA02080A10.1039/C6TA02080A ↗
17. Jang B, Park M, Chae OB et al (2012) Direct synthesis of self-assembled ferrite/carbon hybrid nanosheets for high performance lithium-ion battery anodes. J Am Chem Soc 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja305539r10.1021/ja305539r ↗
18. Lee J, Lee D, Oh E et al (2005) Preparation of a magnetically switchable bioelectrocatalytic system employing cross-linked enzyme aggregates in magnetic mesocellular carbon foam. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 44:7427–7432. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20050299510.1002/anie.200502995 ↗
19. Li YX, Chen WF, Zhou XZ et al (2005) Synthesis of CeO2 nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing and the inhibiting action of NaCl on particle agglomeration. Mater Lett 59:48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.08910.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.089 ↗
20. Li D, Poudyal N, Nandwana V et al (2006) Hard magnetic FePt nanoparticles by salt-matrix annealing. J Appl Phys 99:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.216659710.1063/1.2166597 ↗
21. Li Y, Cao Y, Jia D (2014) A general strategy for synthesis of metal nanoparticles by a solid-state redox route under ambient conditions. J Mater Chem A 2:3761. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta14427e10.1039/c3ta14427e ↗
22. Lin CR, Chu YM, Wang SC (2006) Magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles prepared by mechanochemical reaction. Mater Lett 60:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.00910.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.009 ↗
23. Lin C, Wu G, Li H et al (2017) Rh nanoparticles supported on ultrathin carbon nanosheets for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction and catalytic hydrogenation. Nano 9:1834–1839. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR09739A10.1039/C6NR09739A ↗
24. Liu H, Su D, Zhou R et al (2012) Highly ordered mesoporous MOS2 with expanded spacing of the (002) crystal plane for ultrafast lithium ion storage. Adv Energy Mater 2:970–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20120008710.1002/aenm.201200087 ↗
25. Ma J, Sun S, Wang T, Chen K (2015) Discovery of hard-magnetic domains in two-dimensional arrays of soft-magnetic Fe3O4 nanocubes. J Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.492862410.1063/1.4928624 ↗
26. Martin JE, Wilcoxon JP, Odinek J, Provencio P (2002) Superlattices of platinum and palladium nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 106(5):971–978. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP013994410.1021/JP0139944 ↗
27. Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2005) Catalysis with transition metal nanoparticles in colloidal solution: nanoparticle shape dependence and stability. J Phys Chem B 109:12663–12676. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp051066p10.1021/jp051066p ↗
28. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J (2003) Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys 36:R167–R181. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/20110.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 ↗
29. Park YI, Piao Y, Lee N et al (2011) Transformation of hydrophobic iron oxide nanoparticles to hydrophilic and biocompatible maghemite nanocrystals for use as highly efficient MRI contrast agent. J Mater Chem 21:11472. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm10432b10.1039/c1jm10432b ↗
30. Park SK, Lee J, Hwang T et al (2017) Scalable synthesis of honeycomb-like ordered mesoporous carbon nanosheets and their application in lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:2430–2438. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1337010.1021/acsami.6b13370 ↗
31. Poudyal N, Chaubey GS, Rong C-B et al (2013) Synthesis of monodisperse FeCo nanoparticles by reductive salt-matrix annealing. Nanotechnology 24:345605. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/34/34560510.1088/0957-4484/24/34/345605 ↗
32. Qin J, He C, Zhao N et al (2014) Graphene networks anchored with Sn@graphene as lithium ion battery anode. ACS Nano 8:1728–1738. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn406105n10.1021/nn406105n ↗
33. Qin J, Zhang X, Zhao N et al (2015) In situ preparation of interconnected networks constructed by using flexible graphene/Sn sandwich nanosheets for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem A 3:23170–23179. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA06550J10.1039/C5TA06550J ↗
34. Qiu J, Li S, Su X et al (2017) Bismuth nano-spheres encapsulated in porous carbon network for robust and fast sodium storage. Chem Eng J 320:300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.05410.1016/j.cej.2017.03.054 ↗
35. Rong CB, Li D, Nandwana V et al (2006) Size-dependent chemical and magnetic ordering in L10-FePt nanoparticles. Adv Mater 18:2984–2988. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060190410.1002/adma.200601904 ↗
36. Seinberg L, Yamamoto S, Gallage R et al (2012) Low temperature solventless synthesis and characterization of Ni and Fe magnetic nanoparticles. Chem Commun 48:8237. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc33830k10.1039/c2cc33830k ↗
37. Serna P, Gates BC (2014) Molecular metal catalysts on supports: organometallic chemistry meets surface science. Acc Chem Res 47:2612–2620. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar500170k10.1021/ar500170k ↗
38. Song I, Park C, Hong M et al (2014) Patternable large-scale molybdenium disulfide atomic layers grown by gold-assisted chemical vapor deposition. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 53:1266–1269. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20130947410.1002/anie.201309474 ↗
39. Sun S (2000a) Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal Superlattices. Science (80- ) 287:1989–1992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5460.198910.1126/science.287.5460.1989 ↗
40. Sun S (2000b) Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal Superlattices. Science (80- ) 287:1989–1992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5460.198910.1126/science.287.5460.1989 ↗
41. Sun W, Rui X, Yang D et al (2015) Two-dimensional tin disulfide Nanosheets for enhanced sodium storage. ACS Nano 9:11371–11381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0522910.1021/acsnano.5b05229 ↗
42. Tolaymat TM, El Badawy AM, Genaidy A et al (2010) An evidence-based environmental perspective of manufactured silver nanoparticle in syntheses and applications: a systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed scientific papers. Sci Total Environ 408:999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.00310.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.003 ↗
43. Tsuzuki T, McCormick P (2000) Synthesis of Cr2O3 nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing. Acta Mater 48:2795–2801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00100-210.1016/S1359-6454(00)00100-2 ↗
44. Tsuzuki T, Pethick K, Mccormick PG (2000) Synthesis of CaCO3 nanoparticles by mechanochemical processing. J Nanopart Res 2(4):375–38010.1023/A:1010051506232 ↗
45. Vidyasagar CC, Naik YA, Venkatesha TG, Viswanatha R (2012) Solid-state synthesis and effect of temperature on optical properties of CuO nanoparticles. Nano-Micro Lett 4:73–77. https://doi.org/10.3786/nml.v4i2.p73-7710.3786/nml.v4i2.p73-77 ↗
46. Wang H, Pan Q, Wu Q et al (2017a) Ultrasmall MoS2 embedded in carbon nanosheets-coated Sn/SnOx as anode material for high-rate and long life li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 5:4576–4582. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA10932B10.1039/C6TA10932B ↗
47. Wang Z, Wang D, Luo S et al (2017b) Three-dimensional porous bowl-shaped carbon cages interspersed with carbon coated Ni–Sn alloy nanoparticles as anode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. New J Chem 41:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NJ02458K10.1039/C6NJ02458K ↗
48. Wen F, Hou H, Xiang J et al (2015) Fabrication of carbon encapsulated Co3O4 nanoparticles embedded in porous graphitic carbon nanosheets for microwave absorber. Carbon N Y 89:372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.05710.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.057 ↗
49. Wilcoxon JP, Provencio PP (1999) Use of surfactant micelles to control the structural phase of Nanosize iron clusters. J Phys Chem B 103:9809–9812. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992133g10.1021/jp992133g ↗
50. Wilcoxon JP, Abrams BL, Murray CB et al (2006) Synthesis, structure and properties of metal nanoclusters. Chem Soc Rev 35:1162. https://doi.org/10.1039/b517312b10.1039/b517312b ↗
51. Wu G, Liang X, Zhang H et al (2016a) Highly stable and sub-3 nm Ni nanoparticles coated with carbon nanosheets as a highly active heterogeneous hydrogenation catalyst. Catal Commun 79:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.03.00810.1016/j.catcom.2016.03.008 ↗
52. Wu L, Yang J, Zhou X et al (2016b) Silicon nanoparticles embedded in a porous carbon matrix as a high-performance anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 4:11381–11387. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA04398D10.1039/C6TA04398D ↗
53. Xia Y, Xiong Y, Lim B, Skrabalak S (2009) Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew Chemie Int Ed 48:60–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20080224810.1002/anie.200802248 ↗
54. Xiao PF, Lai MO, Lu L (2012) Electrochemical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 synthesized via mechanochemical reaction. Electrochim Acta 76:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.09210.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.092 ↗
55. Xin S, Guo YG, Wan LJ (2012) Nanocarbon networks for advanced rechargeable lithium batteries. Acc Chem Res 45:1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300094m10.1021/ar300094m ↗
56. Xu Z, Zhang Y, Lin S, et al (2015) Synthesis and transfer of large-area monolayer WS2 crystals : moving toward the recyclable use of sapphire substrates synthesis and transfer of large-area monolayer WS2 Crystals : moving toward the recyclable use of sapphire substrates. 6178–6187. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0148010.1021/acsnano.5b01480 ↗
57. Yan B, Zhou J, Liang X et al (2017) Facile synthesis of flake-like TiO2/C nano-composites for photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible-light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 392:889–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.11710.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.117 ↗
58. Yu SH, Lee DJ, Park M et al (2015) Hybrid cellular Nanosheets for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. J Am Chem Soc 137:11954–11961. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b0367310.1021/jacs.5b03673 ↗
59. Zeng H, Li J, Liu JP et al (2002) Exchange-coupled nanocomposite magnets by nanoparticle self-assembly. Nature 420:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0120810.1038/nature01208 ↗
60. Zhao X, Wang H-E, Massé RC et al (2017) Design of coherent anode materials with 0D Ni3 S2 nanoparticles self-assembled on 3D interconnected carbon networks for fast and reversible sodium storage. J Mater Chem A 5:7394–7402. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA01056G10.1039/C7TA01056G ↗
61. Zhou J, Qin J, Guo L et al (2016a) Scalable synthesis of high-quality transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets and their application as sodium-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem A 4:17370–17380. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA07425A10.1039/C6TA07425A ↗
62. Zhou JW, Qin J, Zhao NQ et al (2016b) Salt-template-assisted synthesis of robust 3D honeycomb-like structured MoS2 and its application as a lithium-ion battery anode. J Mater Chem A 4:8734–8741. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta02565j10.1039/c6ta02565j ↗