journal article·2017-06Open access

Magnetic phases at the molecular scale: the case of cylindrical Co nanoparticles

Pablo Díaz, Eugenio E. Vogel, Francisco Munoz

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 19· Issue 6

Abstract

The magnetic phases of cobalt nanocylinders at the molecular scale have been studied by means of density functional theory together with micromagnetism. Diameters of the objects are under 1 nm. The magnetic phases resulting from first-principle calculations are far from obvious and quite different from both semiclassical results and extrapolations from what is measured for larger objects. These differences reinforce the importance of the quantum mechanical approach for small nanoscopic particles. One of the main results reported here is precisely the unexpected order in the last filled orbitals, which produce objects with alternating magnetic properties as the length of the cylinder increases. The resulting anisotropy is not obvious. The vortex phase is washed out due to the aspect ratio of the systems and the strength of the exchange constants for Co. Nevertheless, we do a pedagogical experiment by turning gradually down the exchange constants to investigate the kind of vortex states which are hidden underneath the ferromagnetic phases.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Aguilera-Granja F, Montejano-Carrizales JM, Vogel EE (2014) Structural and electronic properties of magnetic cylinders at the atomic scale. Eur Phys J D 68(2):3810.1140/epjd/e2014-40639-0 ↗
2. Aguilera-Granja F, Montejano-Carrizales JM, Vogel EE (2016) Structural and oxidation properties of coni nanowires. Eur Phys J D 70(6):13710.1140/epjd/e2016-70162-1 ↗
3. Antonel PS, Oliveira CLP, Jorge GA, Perez OE, Leyva AG, Negri RM (2015) Synthesis and characterization of cofe2o4 magnetic nanotubes, nanorods and nanowires. formation of magnetic structured elastomers by magnetic field-induced alignment of cofe2o4 nanorods. J Nanoparticle Res 17(7):29410.1007/s11051-015-3073-7 ↗
4. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
5. Bryan MT, Bance S, Dean J, Schrefl T, Allwood DA (2012) Transverse and vortex domain wall structure in magnetic nanowires with uniaxial in-plane anisotropy. J Phys Condens Matter 24(2):02420510.1088/0953-8984/24/2/024205 ↗
6. D’Albuquerque e Castro J, Altbir D, Retamal JC, Vargas P (2002) Scaling approach to the magnetic phase diagram of nanosized systems. Phys Rev Lett 88:23720210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.237202 ↗
7. Dorantes-Davila J, Pastor GM (2005) Magnetic reorientation transitions along the crossover from one-dimensional to two-dimensional transition-metal nanostructures. Phys Rev B 72:08542710.1103/PhysRevB.72.085427 ↗
8. Douvalis AP, Bourlinos AB, Tucek J, Čépe K, Bakas T, Zboril R (2016) Development of novel fept/nanodiamond hybrid nanostructures: L10 phase size-growth suppression and magnetic properties. J Nanoparticle Res 18(5):11510.1007/s11051-016-3424-z ↗
9. Gambardella P, Dallmeyer A, Maiti K, Malagoli M, Eberhardt W, Kern K, Carbone C (2002) Ferromagnetism in one-dimensional monatomic metal chains. Nature 416(6878):301–30410.1038/416301a ↗
10. Gilbert TL (2004) A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials. IEEE Trans Magn 40(6):3443–344910.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
11. Gómez-Polo C, Larumbe S, Barquín LF, Fernández LR (2016) Magnetic induction heating as a new tool for the synthesis of fe3o4–tio2 nanoparticle systems. J Nanoparticle Res 18(5):11810.1007/s11051-016-3426-x ↗
12. Hobbs D, Kresse G, Hafner J (2000) Fully unconstrained noncollinear magnetism within the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 62(17):11556–1157010.1103/PhysRevB.62.11556 ↗
13. Hong J, Wu RQ (2003) First principles calculations of magnetic anisotropy energy of co monatomic wires. Phys Rev B 67:02040610.1103/PhysRevB.67.020406 ↗
14. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996a) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mat Sci 6:1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
15. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996b) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
16. Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–56110.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
17. Kresse G, Hafner J (1994) Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys Rev B 49:14251–1426910.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
18. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
19. Landau LP, Lifshitz EM (1935) On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys Z Sowjetunion 8:153–169
20. Landeros P, Escrig J, Altbir D, Bahiana M, e Castro J (2006) Stability of magnetic configurations in nanorings. J Appl Phys 100(4):04431110.1063/1.2218997 ↗
21. Li F, Wang T, Ren L, Sun J (2004) Structure and magnetic properties of co nanowires in self-assembled arrays. J Phys Condens Matter 16(45):805310.1088/0953-8984/16/45/027 ↗
22. Munoz F, Romero AH, Mejia-Lopez J, Moran-Lopez JL (2013) Finite size effects on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy in fe magnetic nanowires from first principles. J Nanopart Res 15(4):1–1110.1007/s11051-013-1524-6 ↗
23. Nielsch K, Castano FJ, Matthias S, Lee W, Ross CA (2005) Synthesis of cobalt/polymer multilayer nanotubes. Adv Eng Mater 7(4):217–22110.1002/adem.200400192 ↗
24. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
25. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Generalized gradient approximation made simple [phys. rev. lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys Rev Lett 78:1396–139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
26. Raphael MP, Christodoulides JA, Qadri SN, Simpkins BS, Byers JM (2010) Magnetic moment degradation of nanowires in biological media: real-time monitoring with squid magnetometry. Nanotechnology 21(28):28510110.1088/0957-4484/21/28/285101 ↗
27. Sayed F, Labaye Y, Sayed Hassan R, El Haj Hassan F, Yaacoub N, Greneche J-M (2016) Size and thickness effect on magnetic structures of maghemite hollow magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 18(9):1–1110.1007/s11051-016-3584-x ↗
28. Velázquez-Galván Y, Martínez-Huerta JM, Medina JDLT, Danlée Y, Piraux L, Encinas A (2014) Dipolar interaction in arrays of magnetic. J Phys Condens Matter 26(2):02600110.1088/0953-8984/26/2/026001 ↗
29. Vogel EE, Vargas P, Altbir D, Escrig J (2010) Handbook of nanophysics, vol 4. CRC press,
30. Xie J, Chen L, Varadan VK, Yancey J, Srivatsan M (2008) The effects of functional magnetic nanotubes with incorporated nerve growth factor in neuronal differentiation of pc12 cells. Nanotechnology 19(10):10510110.1088/0957-4484/19/10/105101 ↗
31. Zhang W, Singh R, Bray-Ali N, Haas S (2008) Scaling analysis and application: Phase diagram of magnetic nanorings and elliptical nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 77:14442810.1103/PhysRevB.77.144428 ↗