Comparative in vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetic evaluation of phenytoin sodium loaded polymeric nanomicelles and marketed phenytoin sodium iv
Source abstract
Abstract
The biodistribution and pharmacokinetic characteristics of intravenously administered phenytoin sodium-loaded nanomicelles were assessed and compared to the commercially available phenytoin sodium iv at a dose of 25 mg/kg. In the biodistribution analysis, the phenytoin sodium-loaded nanomicelles displayed a maximum brain drug concentration of 865 ± 1.0 µg after 15 min of administration, whereas the marketed phenytoin sodium iv and phenytoin sodium solution exhibited maximum concentrations of 707.2 ± 65.6 µg and 168.4 ± 10.4 µg, respectively, after 30 min. Furthermore, in vivo biodistribution studies using dye-loaded polymeric nanomicelles demonstrated rapid brain uptake within five minutes of administration. During a 60-min period, the optimized formulation of nanomicelles resulted in higher plasma drug concentrations than the marketed formulation and phenytoin sodium solution, indicating reduced plasma protein binding. Additionally, the optimized nanomicelles exhibited lower drug deposition in peripheral organs when compared to the marketed phenytoin sodium iv, thereby reducing peripheral toxicity. Consequently, these findings suggest that phenytoin sodium-loaded nanomicelles hold promise as a potential treatment option for managing acute seizure emergencies.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Alvarez V, Januel JM, Burnand B, Rossetti AO (2011) Second-line status epilepticus treatment: Comparison of phenytoin, valproate, and levetiracetam. Epilepsia 52:1292–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03056.x10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03056.x ↗
2. Asha P, Fathima KM, Sreeja CN (2017) Intra nasal in situ gelling system of lamotrigine using ion activated mucoadhesive polymer. Open Med Chem J 11:222–24410.2174/1874104501711010222 ↗
3. Eugen T et al (2016) Pharmacologic treatment of status epilepticus. Expert Opin Pharmacother 17:513–53410.1517/14656566.2016.1127354 ↗
4. Marchi N, Betto G, Fazio V (2009) Blood-brain barrier damage and brain penetration of antiepileptic drugs: role of serum proteins and brain edema. Epilepsia 50:664–67710.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01989.x ↗
5. Pardridge WM (2012) Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32:1959–197210.1038/jcbfm.2012.126 ↗
6. Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ (2010) Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis 37:13–2510.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 ↗
7. Pardridge W (2005) The blood-brain barrier: Bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx 2:3–1410.1602/neurorx.2.1.3 ↗
8. Achar A, Myers R, Ghosh C (2021) Drug delivery challenges in brain disorders across the blood-brain barrier: novel methods and future considerations for improved therapy. Biomedicines 9:183410.3390/biomedicines9121834 ↗
9. Hersh DS, Wadajkar AS, Roberts N, Perez JG, Connolly NP, Frenkel V, Winkles JA, Woodworth GF, Kim AJ (2016) Evolving drug delivery strategies to overcome the blood brain barrier. Curr Pharm Des 22:1177–119310.2174/1381612822666151221150733 ↗
10. Richard C, Frederick L, Mary B (2014) Inhibition of the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein: time for a change of strategy? Drug Metab Dispos 42:623–63110.1124/dmd.113.056176 ↗
11. Abraham J, Edgerly M, Wilson R, Chen C, Rutt A, Bakke S, Robey R, Dwyer A, Goldspiel B, Balis F et al (2009) A phase I study of the P-glycoprotein antagonist tariquidar in combination with vinorelbine. Clin Cancer Res 15:3574–358210.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0938 ↗
12. Xu W, Ling P, Zhang T (2013) Polymeric micelles, a promising drug delivery system to enhance bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. J Drug Deliv 2013:1–1510.1155/2013/340315 ↗
13. Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY (2002) Pluronic block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery. J Control Release 2:189–21210.1016/S0168-3659(02)00009-3 ↗
14. Dehghan Kelishady P, Saadat E, Ravar F, Akbari H, Dorkoosh F (2014) Pluronic F127 polymeric micelles for co-delivery of paclitaxel and lapatinib against metastatic breast cancer: preparation, optimization and in vitro evaluation. Pharm Dev Technol 20:1009–101710.3109/10837450.2014.965323 ↗
15. Fang Z, Chen S, Qin J, Chen B, Ni G, Chen Z et al (2016) Pluronic P85-coated poly(butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles overcome phenytoin resistance in P-glycoprotein overexpressing rats with lithium-pilocarpine-induced chronic temporal lobe epilepsy. Biomaterials 97:110–12110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.021 ↗
16. Naveed S, Guoyu P, William FE (2008) Interactions of pluronic block copolymers on P-gp efflux activity: experience with HIV-1 protease inhibitors. J Pharm Sci 97:5421–543310.1002/jps.21372 ↗
17. Kalle S, Pia S, Urban S, Lena S et al (2017) Nanocrystal formulations of a poorly soluble drug. 2. Evaluation of nanocrystal liver uptake and distribution after intravenous administration to mice. Int J Pharm 524:248–25610.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.062 ↗
18. Vrinda SK, Vinayan KP, Sabitha M (2022) Anticonvulsant and acute toxicity evaluation of phenytoin sodium–loaded polymeric nanomicelle in MES rat model. J Nanopart Res 24:15410.1007/s11051-022-05502-7 ↗
19. Jian L, Jie L, Yuanqing G, Yuanjin Z, Yeye X, Xin W (2021) CRISPR-Cas9: A method for establishing rat models of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Acta Pharm Sin B 10:2973–2982
20. Handan S, Erdogan U, Ayhan D, Omur K, Nihat E (2011) Effects of intraperitoneal administration of the phenytoin on the skeletal system of rat fetus. Seizure 20:187–19310.1016/j.seizure.2010.12.009 ↗
21. Jian-Sheng L, Jian-Hong W, Jie Z, Xing-Hua T, Lan X, Teng S, Xun-Yi W, Zhen H (2014) Enhanced brain delivery of lamotrigine with Pluronic® P123-based nanocarrier. Int J Nanomedicine 9:3923–3935
22. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N (2008) Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J 22:659–66110.1096/fj.07-9574LSF ↗
23. Christina CP, Chunyan H, Ann RS, Keith AK, Chen XW (2010) Technique for collection of cerebrospinal fluid from the cisterna magna in rat. J Neurosc Methods 187:8–1210.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.002 ↗
24. Czapp M, Bankstahl JP, Zibell G, Potschka H (2008) Brain penetration and anticonvulsant efficacy of intranasal phenobarbital in rats. Epilepsia 49:1142–115010.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01582.x ↗
25. Sreeja CN, Vinayan KP, Sabitha M (2021) Nose to brain delivery of phenytoin sodium loaded Nano lipid carriers: formulation, drug release, permeation and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies. Pharmaceutics 13:164010.3390/pharmaceutics13101640 ↗
26. Mohammed AS, Osama AA, Gehan FB, Almalki WH (2018) Self-assembled biodegradable polymeric micelles to improve dapoxetine delivery across the blood–brain barrier. Int J Nanomedicine 13:3679–368710.2147/IJN.S168148 ↗
27. Jialin Y, Huayu Q, Shouchun Y, Hebin W, Yang L (2021) Polymeric drug delivery system based on pluronics for cancer treatment. Molecules 26:361010.3390/molecules26123610 ↗
28. Potschka H, Loscher W (2001) In vivo evidence for P-glycoprotein- mediated transport of phenytoin at the blood-brain barrier of rats. Epilepsia 42:1231–124010.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.01901.x ↗
29. Isbell J, Yuan D, Torrao L, Gatlik E, Hoffmann L, Wipfli P (2019) Plasma protein binding of highly bound drugs determined with equilibrium gel filtration of nonradiolabeled compounds and LC-MS/MS detection. J Pharm Sci 108:1053–106010.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.004 ↗
30. Nilsson LB (2013) The bioanalytical challenge of determining unbound concentration and protein binding for drugs. Bioanalysis 5:3033–305010.4155/bio.13.274 ↗
31. Wang Y, Liu L, Jiang Q, Zhang Q (2007) Self-aggregated nanoparticles of cholesterol-modified chitosan conjugate as a novel carrier of epirubicin. Euro Poly J 43:43–5110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.09.007 ↗
32. Harisa GI, Alanazi FK (2014) Low-density lipoprotein bionanoparticles: from cholesterol transport to delivery of anti-cancer drugs. Saudi Pharm J 22:504–51510.1016/j.jsps.2013.12.015 ↗
33. Kalle S, Pia S, Urban S, Lena S (2017) Nanocrystal formulations of a poorly soluble drug. Evaluation of nanocrystal liver uptake and distribution after intravenous administration to mice. Int J Pharm 524:248–25610.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.062 ↗