journal article·2023-08

Donor dynamics of reverse type I core/shell nanostructure embedded in inorganic and organic polymer matrices

Anitha Balakrishnan, Vignesh Ganesan, Nithiananthi Perumal

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 25· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The role of surface ligand in tuning the carrier dynamics of reverse type I Al0.3Ga0.7As/ GaAs Core/Shell Nanostructure (CSN) has been investigated by considering two different ligand matrices: (i) inorganic 2D SiO2 and (ii) organic 2D conjugated polymer (2D-CP) with barrier potentials of 3.9 eV and 0.784 eV, respectively. The effective mass approximation combined with the variation technique is used to calculate the numerical results. The impact of ligand on the binding energy (BE) and diamagnetic susceptibility (χdia) of donor is examined for various donor locations (R) at varied core (Rc) and shell (Rs) radii. The spatial extent of carriers (red2) manifests the tunneling ability of electrons in the CSNs. The system exhibits diverse behavior and increased stability in the presence of organic 2D-CP and inorganic 2D SiO2 matrix. The present work will update the significance of ligand passivated reverse type I CSN for effective quantum tunneling devices.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · ZnO doping and properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Ghosh Chaudhuri R, Paria S (2012) Chem Rev 112:2373. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100449n10.1021/cr100449n ↗
2. Wang L, Lv Y, Lin J, Zhao J, Liu X, Zeng R, Wang X, Zou B (2021) J Mater Chem C 9:2483. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tc05391k10.1039/d0tc05391k ↗
3. Reiss P, Protière M, Li L (2009) Small 5:154. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20080084110.1002/smll.200800841 ↗
4. Neo D, Cheng C, Stranks S, Fairclough S, Kim J, Kirkland A, Smith J, Snaith H, Assender H, Watt A (2014) Chem Mater 26:4004. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm501595u10.1021/cm501595u ↗
5. Rowland CE, Liu W, Hannah DC, Chan MK, Talapin DV, Schaller RD (2014) ACS Nano 8:977. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn405811p10.1021/nn405811p ↗
6. Carnevale DJ, Shatruk M, Strouse GF (2016) Chem Mater 28:5480. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0206210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02062 ↗
7. Wang XS, Dykstra TE, Salvador MR, Manners I, Scholes GD, Winnik MA (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:7784. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja048933910.1021/ja0489339 ↗
8. Steckel JS, Zimmer JP, Coe-Sullivan S, Stott NE, Bulović V, Bawendi MG (2004) Angew Chemie - Int Ed 43:2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20045372810.1002/anie.200453728 ↗
9. Ibral A, Zouitine A, Assaid EM, Feddi EM, Dujardin F (2014) Phys B Condens Matter 449:261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2014.05.04510.1016/j.physb.2014.05.045 ↗
10. El Haouari M, Talbi A, Feddi E, El Ghazi H, Oukerroum A, Dujardin F (2017) Opt Commun 383:231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.09.01910.1016/j.optcom.2016.09.019 ↗
11. Zeng Z, Garoufalis CS, Terzis AF, Baskoutas S (2013) J Appl Phys 114. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481309410.1063/1.4813094 ↗
12. Ganesan P, Senthilkumar L (2015) Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct 74:204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2015.07.00210.1016/j.physe.2015.07.002 ↗
13. Vignesh G, Nithiananthi P (2016) Superlattice Microstruct 92:232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.01710.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.017 ↗
14. Sudharshan MS, Subhash P, Shaik NB, Kalpana P, Jayakumar K, Reuben AMJD, Conf AIP (2015) Proc 1665:90044–90051. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.491802410.1063/1.4918024 ↗
15. Avazzadeh Z, Bahramiyan H, Khordad R, Mohammadi SA (2016) Eur Phys J Plus 131:1. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2016-16121-810.1140/epjp/i2016-16121-8 ↗
16. Anikeeva PO, Halpert JE, Bawendi MG (2007) Nano Lett 7:2196. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070342410.1021/nl0703424 ↗
17. Qu L, Peng X (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:2049. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja017002j10.1021/ja017002j ↗
18. Reiss P, Bleuse J, Pron A (2002) Nano Lett 2:7–781. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl025596y10.1021/nl025596y ↗
19. Zhou J, Liu Y, Tang J, Tang W (2017) Mater Today 20:360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.00610.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.006 ↗
20. Chen Y, Friberg P, Gan L, Ning Z, Molna M (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:5848. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02688c10.1039/c0cp02688c ↗
21. Kilina S, Ivanov S, Tretiak S (2009) J Am Chem Soc 131:7717. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja900574910.1021/ja9005749 ↗
22. Allan G, Delerue CM et al (1995) Phys Rev B 52:11982. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.1198210.1103/PhysRevB.52.11982 ↗
23. Konstantatos G, Howard I, Fischer A et al (2006) Nature 442:180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0485510.1038/nature04855 ↗
24. Bawendi MG, Caruge JM, Halpert JE, Wood V, Bulovic V (2008) Nature Photonics 2:247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.3410.1038/nphoton.2008.34 ↗
25. Gur I, Fromer NA, Geier ML et al (2005) Science 310:462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.111790810.1126/science.1117908 ↗
26. Yu XF, Chen LD, Li M, Xie MY, Zhou L, Li Y, Wang QQ (2008) Adv Mater 20:4118. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080122410.1002/adma.200801224 ↗
27. Gutzler R (2016) Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:29092. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP06101J10.1039/C6CP06101J ↗
28. Dallali L, Jaziri S et al (2015) Solid State Commun 209:33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2015.02.01210.1016/j.ssc.2015.02.012 ↗
29. Gao Z, Dong X, Li N, Ren J (2017) Nano Lett 17:772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0392110.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03921 ↗
30. Büchner C, Heyde M (2017) Prog Surf Sci 92:341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2017.09.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2017.09.001 ↗
31. Gao E, Xie B, Xu Z (2016) J App Phys 119:014301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493927910.1063/1.4939279 ↗
32. Chen JT, Hsu C (2011) Polym Chem 2:2707. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1PY00275A10.1039/C1PY00275A ↗
33. Lee C, Giridhar T, Choi J, Kim S, Kim Y, Lee W, Cho H, Wang C, Ade PH, Kim BJ (2017) Chem Mater 29:9407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0349510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03495 ↗
34. Xie J, Gu P, Zhang Q (2017) ACS Energy Lett 2:1985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0049410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00494 ↗
35. Anitha B, Nithiananthi P (2019) Superlattices Microstructures 135:106288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2019.10628810.1016/j.spmi.2019.106288 ↗
36. Nithiananthi P, Jayakumar K (2007) Int J Nanosci 6:1. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X0700425010.1142/S0219581X07004250 ↗
37. Yang P, Tretiak S, Ivanov S (2011) J Clust Sci 22:405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-011-0398-y10.1007/s10876-011-0398-y ↗
38. Gao Y, Zhou B, Kang SG, Xin M et al (2014) RSC Adv 4:27146. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra03202k10.1039/c4ra03202k ↗
39. Schnitzenbaumer KJ, Dukovic G (2014) J Phys Chem C 118:28170. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509224n10.1021/jp509224n ↗