journal article·2022-11

Hierarchical phase separation in all small-molecule organic solar cells

Muhammad Junaid Iqbal, Jianqi Zhang, Zhixiang Wei

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Solution processable small-molecule organic solar cells have progressed a lot in terms of donor and acceptor materials, device architectures, fabrication techniques, and optimization methodologies which have enabled credible performance gains. The hierarchical active layer morphology is one such strategy that has led to significant performance gains by overcoming the earlier systems’ shortcomings and providing an optimized active layer morphology with features well within the confines of the excitonic diffusion length (LD) (5–30 nm). Multi-length scale domains, lateral and vertical phase separation, and interconnected network-like charge transport pathways are some of the key morphological features that lead to enhanced open-circuit voltage, short circuit current, fill factor, and in turn, greater power conversion efficiencies. This has furthered our understanding of the relationship between morphology and the charge generation, transport, disassociation, and extraction processes. In this review, we summarize the efforts concentrated on achieving such optimized hierarchical morphologies in binary and ternary small molecule-based organic solar cells and provide insights into the relationship between performance and morphology.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Kaltenbrunner M et al (2012) Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility. Nat Commun 3(1):1–710.1038/ncomms1772 ↗
2. Li G, Zhu R, Yang Y (2012) Polymer solar cells. Nat Photonics 6(3):153–16110.1038/nphoton.2012.11 ↗
3. Chen Y, Wan X, Long G (2013) High performance photovoltaic applications using solution-processed small molecules. Acc Chem Res 46(11):2645–265510.1021/ar400088c ↗
4. Collins SD et al (2017) Small is powerful: recent progress in solution-processed small molecule solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 7(10):160224210.1002/aenm.201602242 ↗
5. Traverse CJ et al (2017) Emergence of highly transparent photovoltaics for distributed applications. Nat Energy 2(11):849–86010.1038/s41560-017-0016-9 ↗
6. Inganäs O (2018) Organic photovoltaics over three decades. Adv Mater 30(35):180038810.1002/adma.201800388 ↗
7. Zhan X, Zhu D (2010) Conjugated polymers for high-efficiency organic photovoltaics. Polym Chem 1(4):409–41910.1039/B9PY00325H ↗
8. Zhao J et al (2016) Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat Energy 1(2):1–710.1038/nenergy.2015.27 ↗
9. Fan H, Zhu X (2015) Development of small-molecule materials for high-performance organic solar cells. SCIENCE CHINA Chem 58(6):922–93610.1007/s11426-015-5418-6 ↗
10. Wan X et al (2020) Acceptor–donor–acceptor type molecules for high performance organic photovoltaics–chemistry and mechanism. Chem Soc Rev 49(9):2828–284210.1039/D0CS00084A ↗
11. Zhan L et al (2020) Over 17% efficiency ternary organic solar cells enabled by two non-fullerene acceptors working in an alloy-like model. Energy Environ Sci 13(2):635–64510.1039/C9EE03710A ↗
12. An Q et al (2020) Two compatible polymer donors contribute synergistically for ternary organic solar cells with 17.53% efficiency. Energy Environ Sci 13(12):5039–504710.1039/D0EE02516J ↗
13. Liu Q et al (2020) 18% Efficiency organic solar cells. Science Bulletin 65(4):272–27510.1016/j.scib.2020.01.001 ↗
14. Dennler G, Scharber MC, Brabec CJ (2009) Polymer-fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater 21(13):1323–133810.1002/adma.200801283 ↗
15. Deibel C, Dyakonov V (2010) Polymer–fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Rep Prog Phys 73(9):09640110.1088/0034-4885/73/9/096401 ↗
16. Nelson J (2011) Polymer: fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Mater Today 14(10):462–47010.1016/S1369-7021(11)70210-3 ↗
17. Brabec CJ et al (2010) Polymer–fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater 22(34):3839–385610.1002/adma.200903697 ↗
18. Mihailetchi V et al (2004) Photocurrent generation in polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunctions. Phys Rev Lett 93(21):21660110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.216601 ↗
19. Hoppe H, Sariciftci NS (2006) Morphology of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. J Mater Chem 16(1):45–6110.1039/B510618B ↗
20. Blom PW et al (2007) Device physics of polymer: fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater 19(12):1551–156610.1002/adma.200601093 ↗
21. Persson N-K, Wang X, Inganäs O (2007) Optical limitations in thin-film low-band-gap polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction devices. Appl Phys Lett 91(8):08350310.1063/1.2736280 ↗
22. Pivrikas A et al (2007) A review of charge transport and recombination in polymer/fullerene organic solar cells. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 15(8):677–69610.1002/pip.791 ↗
23. Heeger AJ (2014) 25th anniversary article: bulk heterojunction solar cells: understanding the mechanism of operation. Adv Mater 26(1):10–2810.1002/adma.201304373 ↗
24. Cheng P, Zhan X (2015) Versatile third components for efficient and stable organic solar cells. Mater Horiz 2(5):462–48510.1039/C5MH00090D ↗
25. An Q et al (2016) Versatile ternary organic solar cells: a critical review. Energy Environ Sci 9(2):281–32210.1039/C5EE02641E ↗
26. Xie Y et al (2018) Morphology control enables efficient ternary organic solar cells. Adv Mater 30(38):180304510.1002/adma.201803045 ↗
27. Xie Y et al (2018) High-performance semitransparent ternary organic solar cells. Adv Func Mater 28(49):180062710.1002/adfm.201800627 ↗
28. Bi P, Hao X (2019) Versatile ternary approach for novel organic solar cells: a review. Solar RRL 3(1):180026310.1002/solr.201800263 ↗
29. Gasparini N et al (2019) The role of the third component in ternary organic solar cells. Nat Rev Mater 4(4):229–24210.1038/s41578-019-0093-4 ↗
30. Zhao C et al (2021) Recent advances, challenges and prospects in ternary organic solar cells. Nanoscale 13(4):2181–220810.1039/D0NR07788G ↗
31. Abdulrazzaq OA et al (2013) Organic solar cells: a review of materials, limitations, and possibilities for improvement. Part Sci Technol 31(5):427–44210.1080/02726351.2013.769470 ↗
32. Sun H, Guo X, Facchetti A (2020) High-performance n-type polymer semiconductors: applications, recent development, and challenges. Chem 6(6):1310–132610.1016/j.chempr.2020.05.012 ↗
33. Zhang Z et al (2022) Recent progress in small-molecule donors for non-fullerene all-small-molecule organic solar cells. Nano Select 3(2):233–24710.1002/nano.202100181 ↗
34. Li H et al (2019) The progress of non-fullerene small molecular acceptors for high efficiency polymer solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 190:83–9710.1016/j.solmat.2018.10.016 ↗
35. Kan B et al (2021) Recent progress on all-small molecule organic solar cells using small-molecule nonfullerene acceptors. InfoMat 3(2):175–20010.1002/inf2.12163 ↗
36. Zhang ZG, Li Y (2021) Polymerized small-molecule acceptors for high-performance all-polymer solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 60(9):4422–443310.1002/anie.202009666 ↗
37. Kwon OK et al (2015) An all-small-molecule organic solar cell with high efficiency nonfullerene acceptor. Adv Mater 27(11):1951–195610.1002/adma.201405429 ↗
38. Feng G et al (2016) All-small-molecule organic solar cells based on an electron donor incorporating binary electron-deficient units. J Mater Chem A 4(16):6056–606310.1039/C5TA10430K ↗
39. Guo J et al (2018) All-small molecule solar cells based on donor molecule optimization with highly enhanced efficiency and stability. J Mater Chem A 6(32):15675–1568310.1039/C8TA02778A ↗
40. Chen H et al (2019) All-small-molecule organic solar cells with an ordered liquid crystalline donor. Joule 3(12):3034–304710.1016/j.joule.2019.09.009 ↗
41. Zhang J et al (2018) Material insights and challenges for non-fullerene organic solar cells based on small molecular acceptors. Nat Energy 3(9):720–73110.1038/s41560-018-0181-5 ↗
42. Huo Y, Zhang H-L, Zhan X (2019) Nonfullerene all-small-molecule organic solar cells. ACS Energy Lett 4(6):1241–125010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00528 ↗
43. Ye W et al (2020) Nonfullerene all-small-molecule organic solar cells: prospect and limitation. Solar Rrl 4(11):200025810.1002/solr.202000258 ↗
44. Müller-Buschbaum P (2014) The active layer morphology of organic solar cells probed with grazing incidence scattering techniques. Adv Mater 26(46):7692–770910.1002/adma.201304187 ↗
45. Zhou N et al (2014) Morphology-performance relationships in high-efficiency all-polymer solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 4(3):130078510.1002/aenm.201300785 ↗
46. Ye L et al (2017) High-efficiency nonfullerene organic solar cells: critical factors that affect complex multi-length scale morphology and device performance. Adv Energy Mater 7(7):160200010.1002/aenm.201602000 ↗
47. Zhao F, Wang C, Zhan X (2018) Morphology control in organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 8(28):170314710.1002/aenm.201703147 ↗
48. Fang L et al (2013) Side-chain engineering of isoindigo-containing conjugated polymers using polystyrene for high-performance bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem Mater 25(24):4874–488010.1021/cm4024259 ↗
49. He Z et al (2015) Single-junction polymer solar cells with high efficiency and photovoltage. Nat Photonics 9(3):174–17910.1038/nphoton.2015.6 ↗
50. Elumalai NK, Uddin A (2016) Open circuit voltage of organic solar cells: an in-depth review. Energy Environ Sci 9(2):391–41010.1039/C5EE02871J ↗
51. Thompson BC, Fréchet JM (2008) Polymer–fullerene composite solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(1):58–7710.1002/anie.200702506 ↗
52. Guo X et al (2013) Polymer solar cells with enhanced fill factors. Nat Photonics 7(10):825–83310.1038/nphoton.2013.207 ↗
53. Collins BA et al (2013) Absolute measurement of domain composition and nanoscale size distribution explains performance in PTB7: PC71BM solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 3(1):65–7410.1002/aenm.201200377 ↗
54. Barrau S et al (2009) Nanomorphology of bulk heterojunction organic solar cells in 2D and 3D correlated to photovoltaic performance. Macromolecules 42(13):4646–465010.1021/ma802457v ↗
55. Bisquert J, Garcia-Belmonte G (2011) On voltage, photovoltage, and photocurrent in bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett 2(15):1950–196410.1021/jz2004864 ↗
56. Scharber MC, Sariciftci NS (2013) Efficiency of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. Prog Polym Sci 38(12):1929–194010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.001 ↗
57. Lu L et al (2015) Recent advances in bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells. Chem Rev 115(23):12666–1273110.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00098 ↗
58. Nam YM, Huh J, Jo WH (2010) Optimization of thickness and morphology of active layer for high performance of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94(6):1118–112410.1016/j.solmat.2010.02.041 ↗
59. Brabec CJ et al (2011) Influence of blend microstructure on bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaic performance. Chem Soc Rev 40(3):1185–119910.1039/C0CS00045K ↗
60. Huang Y et al (2014) Bulk heterojunction solar cells: morphology and performance relationships. Chem Rev 114(14):7006–704310.1021/cr400353v ↗
61. Xia T et al (2019) Optimal bulk-heterojunction morphology enabled by fibril network strategy for high-performance organic solar cells. SCIENCE CHINA Chem 62(6):662–66810.1007/s11426-019-9478-2 ↗
62. Brabec CJ et al (2001) Tracing photoinduced electron transfer process in conjugated polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunctions in real time. Chem Phys Lett 340(3–4):232–23610.1016/S0009-2614(01)00431-6 ↗
63. Stübinger T, Brütting W (2001) Exciton diffusion and optical interference in organic donor–acceptor photovoltaic cells. J Appl Phys 90(7):3632–364110.1063/1.1394920 ↗
64. Gregg BA (2005) The photoconversion mechanism of excitonic solar cells. MRS Bull 30(1):20–2210.1557/mrs2005.3 ↗
65. Haugeneder A et al (1999) Exciton diffusion and dissociation in conjugated polymer/fullerene blends and heterostructures. Phys Rev B 59(23):1534610.1103/PhysRevB.59.15346 ↗
66. Vogel M et al (2006) Influence of nanoscale morphology in small molecule organic solar cells. Thin Solid Films 511:367–37010.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.030 ↗
67. Chen C-W et al (2014) Morphology, molecular stacking, dynamics and device performance correlations of vacuum-deposited small-molecule organic solar cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(19):8852–886410.1039/C3CP55385J ↗
68. Min J et al (2015) Integrated molecular, morphological and interfacial engineering towards highly efficient and stable solution-processed small molecule solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3(45):22695–2270710.1039/C5TA06706E ↗
69. Long G et al (2016) New insights into the correlation between morphology, excited state dynamics, and device performance of small molecule organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 6(22):160096110.1002/aenm.201600961 ↗
70. Rand BP et al (2007) Solar cells utilizing small molecular weight organic semiconductors. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 15(8):659–67610.1002/pip.788 ↗
71. Lin Y, Li Y, Zhan X (2012) Small molecule semiconductors for high-efficiency organic photovoltaics. Chem Soc Rev 41(11):4245–427210.1039/c2cs15313k ↗
72. Mishra A, Bäuerle P (2012) Small molecule organic semiconductors on the move: promises for future solar energy technology. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(9):2020–206710.1002/anie.201102326 ↗
73. Theander M et al (2000) Photoluminescence quenching at a p o l y t h i o p h e n e/C 60 heterojunction. Phys Rev B 61(19):1295710.1103/PhysRevB.61.12957 ↗
74. Kim JH et al (2019) The critical impact of material and process compatibility on the active layer morphology and performance of organic ternary solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 9(2):180229310.1002/aenm.201802293 ↗
75. Luo J, Zhou X-H, Jen AK-Y (2009) Rational molecular design and supramolecular assembly of highly efficient organic electro-optic materials. J Mater Chem 19(40):7410–742410.1039/b907173c ↗
76. Niladari Raju M et al (2015) Synthesis and ultrafast dynamics of a donor–acceptor–donor molecule having optoelectronic properties. J Phys Chem C 119(16):8563–857510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02063 ↗
77. Sundar TS, Sen R, Johari P (2016) Rationally designed donor–acceptor scheme based molecules for applications in opto-electronic devices. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18(13):9133–914710.1039/C6CP00367B ↗
78. Irfan M et al (2017) Design of donor–acceptor–donor (D–A–D) type small molecule donor materials with efficient photovoltaic parameters. Int J Quantum Chem 117(10):e2536310.1002/qua.25363 ↗
79. Zhao J et al (2020) Recent advances in high-performance organic solar cells enabled by acceptor–donor–acceptor–donor–acceptor (A–DA′ D-A) type acceptors. Mater Chem Frontiers 4(12):3487–350410.1039/D0QM00305K ↗
80. Zhou H et al (2011) Development of fluorinated benzothiadiazole as a structural unit for a polymer solar cell of 7% efficiency. Angew Chem 123(13):3051–305410.1002/ange.201005451 ↗
81. Ren Y et al (2014) Isoindigo-containing molecular semiconductors: effect of backbone extension on molecular organization and organic solar cell performance. Chem Mater 26(22):6570–657710.1021/cm503312c ↗
82. Gao HH et al (2019) Achieving both enhanced voltage and current through fine-tuning molecular backbone and morphology control in organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater 9(27):190102410.1002/aenm.201901024 ↗
83. Wang X et al (2021) Backbone engineering with asymmetric core to finely tune phase separation for high-performance all-small-molecule organic solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(9):11108–1111610.1021/acsami.0c21986 ↗
84. Jin R, Chang Y (2015) A theoretical study on photophysical properties of triphenylamine-cored molecules with naphthalimide arms and different π-conjugated bridges as organic solar cell materials. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(3):2094–210310.1039/C4CP04394D ↗
85. Ye C et al (2018) High-performance organic solar cells based on a small molecule with thieno [3, 2-b] thiophene as π-bridge. Org Electron 53:273–27910.1016/j.orgel.2017.12.003 ↗
86. Chen Y et al (2019) Changing the π-bridge from thiophene to thieno [3, 2-b] thiophene for the D–π–A type polymer enables high performance fullerene-free organic solar cells. Chem Commun 55(47):6708–671010.1039/C9CC02904D ↗
87. Fan B et al (2020) Tailoring regioisomeric structures of π-conjugated polymers containing monofluorinated π-bridges for highly efficient polymer solar cells. ACS Energy Lett 5(6):2087–209410.1021/acsenergylett.0c00939 ↗
88. Chuang S-Y et al (2009) Regioregularity effects in the chain orientation and optical anisotropy of composite polymer/fullerene films for high-efficiency, large-area organic solar cells. J Mater Chem 19(31):5554–556010.1039/b904870g ↗
89. Chiu M-Y et al (2010) Morphologies of self-organizing regioregular conjugated polymer/fullerene aggregates in thin film solar cells. Macromolecules 43(1):428–43210.1021/ma901895d ↗
90. Kim Y et al (2011) A strong regioregularity effect in self-organizing conjugated polymer films and high-efficiency polythiophene: fullerene solar cells. Materials For Sustainable Energy: A Collection of Peer-Reviewed Research and Review Articles from Nature Publishing Group. World Scientific, pp 63–69
91. Steyrleuthner R et al (2014) The role of regioregularity, crystallinity, and chain orientation on electron transport in a high-mobility n-type copolymer. J Am Chem Soc 136(11):4245–425610.1021/ja4118736 ↗
92. Chandrasekaran N et al (2017) Effect of regioregularity on recombination dynamics in inverted bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J Phys D Appl Phys 51(1):01550110.1088/1361-6463/aa98fc ↗
93. Seo S et al (2022) Importance of High-Electron Mobility in Polymer Acceptors for Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells: Combined Engineering of Backbone Building Unit and Regioregularity. Adv Func Mater 32(5):210850810.1002/adfm.202108508 ↗
94. Li W et al (2014) Controlling Molecular Weight of a High Efficiency Donor-Acceptor Conjugated Polymer and Understanding Its Significant Impact on Photovoltaic Properties. Adv Mater 26(26):4456–446210.1002/adma.201305251 ↗
95. Gibson GL et al (2014) Molecular weight and end capping effects on the optoelectronic properties of structurally related ‘heavy atom’donor–acceptor polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2(35):14468–1448010.1039/C4TA02820A ↗
96. Xiao Z et al (2015) Effect of molecular weight on the properties and organic solar cell device performance of a donor–acceptor conjugated polymer. Polym Chem 6(12):2312–231810.1039/C4PY01631A ↗
97. Li Z et al (2019) Morphology optimization via molecular weight tuning of donor polymer enables all-polymer solar cells with simultaneously improved performance and stability. Nano Energy 64:10393110.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103931 ↗
98. Cho C-H et al (2011) Controlling side-chain density of electron donating polymers for improving their packing structure and photovoltaic performance. Chem Commun 47(12):3577–357910.1039/c1cc10184f ↗
99. Jung M et al (2014) Nanoscopic management of molecular packing and orientation of small molecules by a combination of linear and branched alkyl side chains. ACS Nano 8(6):5988–600310.1021/nn501133y ↗
100. Yan C et al (2017) Enhancing performance of non-fullerene organic solar cells via side chain engineering of fused-ring electron acceptors. Dyes Pigm 139:627–63410.1016/j.dyepig.2016.12.065 ↗