journal article·2022-12

Magnetic spinel manganese ferrite nanocrystal carbon nanotube thin mats with improved electromagnetic shielding performance

Hammad Younes, Mariam Mansoori, Prerna Chaturvedi, Ru Li, Safieh Almahmoud, Sang-Eui Lee, Thomas Myeongseok Koo, Young Keun Kim, Daniel Choi

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Design and fabrication of an effective, affordable, and lightweight material to solve the electromagnetic interference (EMI) problem, through improving the microwave absorption, have become an urgent need during the present period of fast growth of electronic devices and wireless telecommunication technology. Manganese ferrite MnFe2O4 nanoparticles (MFO NPs) with three different particle sizes were synthesized using the hydrothermal reaction technique. The MFO NPs were then mixed with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to fabricate a new EMI shielding mat, through a free polymer-binder surface-engineered tape-casting (SETC) method. The fabricated CNTs-MFO mats have demonstrated superior EMI shielding in the X-band. CNT-only mat (with 48 µm thickness) had a total effective shielding (SEAll), absorption shielding (SEA), and reflection shielding (SER) of 36 dB, 23 dB, and 10 dB, respectively. SEAll of 36 dB proves that the CNT-only mat is a promising material for microwave absorbing materials. However, 1 wt.% of CNTs-MFO-1 has enhanced the SEAll by 14.5% at a frequency of 10.51 GHz. This improvement in SEAll is because of the MFO’s magnetic properties and the heterogeneous structure created by the MFO within the CNT mat, which enhances the EM wave’s absorption.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Zeng Z, Chen M, Jin H, Li W, Xue X, Zhou L et al (2016) Thin and flexible multi-walled carbon nanotube/waterborne polyurethane composites with high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 96:768–77710.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.004 ↗
2. Liu Z, Bai G, Huang Y, Ma Y, Du F, Li F et al (2007) Reflection and absorption contributions to the electromagnetic interference shielding of single-walled carbon nanotube/polyurethane composites. Carbon 45(4):821–82710.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.020 ↗
3. Arjmand M, Chizari K, Krause B, Pötschke P, Sundararaj U (2016) Effect of synthesis catalyst on structure of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes and electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding of their polymeric nanocomposites. Carbon 98:358–37210.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.024 ↗
4. Wang L-L, Tay B-k, See K-Y, Sun Z, Tan L-K, Lua D (2009) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon-based materials prepared by screen printing. Carbon 47(8):1905–1010.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.033 ↗
5. Singh BP, Prasanta Choudhary V, Saini P, Pande S, Singh VN et al (2013) Enhanced microwave shielding and mechanical properties of high loading MWCNT–epoxy composites. J Nanoparticle Res 15(4):1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1554-010.1007/s11051-013-1554-0 ↗
6. Jyoti J, Arya AK (2020) EMI shielding and dynamic mechanical analysis of graphene oxide-carbon nanotube-acrylonitrile butadiene styrene hybrid composites. Polym Testing 91:10683910.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106839 ↗
7. Younes H, Shoaib N, Rahman MM, Al-Rub RA, Hong H, Christensen G et al (2019) Thin carbon nanostructure mat with high electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Synth Met 253:48–5610.1016/j.synthmet.2019.04.026 ↗
8. Zhang L, Liu M, Roy S, Chu EK, See KY, Hu X (2016) Phthalonitrile-based carbon foam with high specific mechanical strength and superior electromagnetic interference shielding performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(11):7422–743010.1021/acsami.5b12072 ↗
9. Xu Y, Li Y, Hua W, Zhang A, Bao J (2016) Light-weight silver plating foam and carbon nanotube hybridized epoxy composite foams with exceptional conductivity and electromagnetic shielding property. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(36):24131–2414210.1021/acsami.6b08325 ↗
10. Lu D, Mo Z, Liang B, Yang L, He Z, Zhu H et al (2018) Flexible, lightweight carbon nanotube sponges and composites for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 133:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.06110.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.061 ↗
11. Zeng Z, Chen M, Pei Y, SeyedShahabadi SI, Che B, Wang P et al (2017) Ultralight and flexible polyurethane/silver nanowire nanocomposites with unidirectional pores for highly effective electromagnetic shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(37):32211–3221910.1021/acsami.7b07643 ↗
12. Wu Y, Wang Z, Liu X, Shen X, Zheng Q, Xue Q et al (2017) Ultralight graphene foam/conductive polymer composites for exceptional electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(10):9059–906910.1021/acsami.7b01017 ↗
13. Jyoti J, Singh BP (2021) A review on 3D graphene–carbon nanotube hybrid polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 56(31):17411–1745610.1007/s10853-021-06370-7 ↗
14. Srivastava RK, Xavier P, Gupta SN, Kar GP, Bose S, Sood A (2016) Excellent electromagnetic interference shielding by graphene-MnFe2O4-multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrids at very low weight percentage in polymer matrix. ChemistrySelect 1(18):5995–600310.1002/slct.201601302 ↗
15. Zhang X-J, Wang G-S, Cao W-Q, Wei Y-Z, Liang J-F, Guo L et al (2014) Enhanced microwave absorption property of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)-MnFe2O4 nanocomposites and polyvinylidene fluoride. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(10):7471–7478. https://doi.org/10.1021/am500862g10.1021/am500862g ↗
16. Yu W-C, Wang T, Zhang G-Q, Wang Z-G, Yin H-M, Yan D-X et al (2018) Largely enhanced mechanical property of segregated carbon nanotube/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites with high electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Compos Sci Technol 167:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.013 ↗
17. Younes H, Li R, Lee S-E, Kim YK, Choi D (2021) Gradient 3D-printed honeycomb structure polymer coated with a composite consisting of Fe3O4 multi-granular nanoclusters and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for electromagnetic wave absorption. Synth Met 275:11673110.1016/j.synthmet.2021.116731 ↗
18. Lopez I, Younes H, Almheiri S, Al Ghaferi A, Al-Rub RA (2020) Highly electrically conductive carbon nanostructured mats fabricated out of aligned CNTs-based flakes. Diamond and Related Materials 10784910.1016/j.diamond.2020.107849 ↗
19. Younes H, Al-Rub RA, Rahman MM, Dalaq A, Al Ghaferi A, Shah T (2016) Processing and property investigation of high-density carbon nanostructured papers with superior conductive and mechanical properties. Diam Relat Mater 68:109–11710.1016/j.diamond.2016.06.016 ↗
20. Susantyoko RA, Karam Z, Alkhoori S, Mustafa I, Wu C-H, Almheiri S (2017) A surface-engineered tape-casting fabrication technique toward the commercialisation of freestanding carbon nanotube sheets. J Mater Chem A 5(36):19255–1926610.1039/C7TA04999D ↗
21. Chaudhary A, Kumari S, Kumar R, Teotia S, Singh BP, Singh AP et al (2016) Lightweight and easily foldable MCMB-MWCNTs composite paper with exceptional electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(16):10600–10608. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1233410.1021/acsami.5b12334 ↗
22. Hong X, Chung D (2017) Carbon nanofiber mats for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 111:529–53710.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.031 ↗
23. Jyoti J, Basu S, Singh BP, Dhakate S (2015) Superior mechanical and electrical properties of multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene high performance composites. Compos B Eng 83:58–6510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.055 ↗
24. Lee S-H, Kang D, Oh I-K (2017) Multilayered graphene-carbon nanotube-iron oxide three-dimensional heterostructure for flexible electromagnetic interference shielding film. Carbon 111:248–25710.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.003 ↗
25. An BH, Park BC, Kanagaraj AB, Chaturvedi P, Yassi HA, Park J-R et al (2019) Microwave absorption properties of magnetite multi-granule nanocluster–multiwall carbon nanotube composites. Funct Mater Lett 12(02):195001110.1142/S1793604719500115 ↗
26. Lim G-H, Woo S, Lee H, Moon K-S, Sohn H, Lee S-E et al (2017) Mechanically robust magnetic carbon nanotube papers prepared with CoFe2O4 nanoparticles for electromagnetic interference shielding and magnetomechanical actuation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(46):40628–4063710.1021/acsami.7b12147 ↗
27. Adebayo LL, Soleimani H, Yahya N, Abbas Z, Wahaab FA, Ayinla RT et al (2020) Recent advances in the development OF Fe3O4-BASED microwave absorbing materials. Ceram Int 46(2):1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.20910.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.209 ↗
28. Rao BB, Chengappa M, Kale S (2017) Lightweight, flexible and thin Fe3O4-loaded, functionalized multi walled carbon nanotube buckypapers for enhanced X-band electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Res Express 4(4):04501210.1088/2053-1591/aa69f4 ↗
29. Li Q, Kartikowati CW, Horie S, Ogi T, Iwaki T, Okuyama K (2017) Correlation between particle size/domain structure and magnetic properties of highly crystalline Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles. Sci Rep 7(1):1–710.1038/s41598-016-0028-x ↗
30. Aslibeiki B, Varvaro G, Peddis D, Kameli P (2017) Particle size, spin wave and surface effects on magnetic properties of MgFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 422:7–1210.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.057 ↗
31. Liu H, Su H, Geng W, Sun Z, Song T, Tong X et al (2016) Effect of particle size distribution on the magnetic properties of Fe-Si-Al powder core. J Supercond Novel Magn 29(2):463–46810.1007/s10948-015-3282-4 ↗
32. Yang Y, Li M, Wu Y, Zong B, Ding J (2016) Size-dependent microwave absorption properties of Fe 3 O 4 nanodiscs. RSC Adv 6(30):25444–2544810.1039/C5RA28035D ↗
33. Younes H, Rahman MM, Ni G, Al Ghaferi A, Al Rub RA, Bsoul I (2019) Investigation of magnetic properties of γ-Fe 2 O 3 NP-decorated carbon nanostructured mats. JOM 1–910.1007/s11837-019-03631-4 ↗
34. Younes H, Ravaux F, El Hadri N, Zou L (2019) Nanostructuring of pseudocapacitive MnFe2O4/porous rGO electrodes in capacitive deionization. Electrochim Acta 306:1–810.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.097 ↗
35. Shah TK, Gardner SH, Alberding MR (2012) CNT-infused fiber and method therefor. Google Patents
36. Wang J, Chen Q, Hou B, Peng Z (2004) Synthesis and magnetic properties of single-crystals of MnFe2O4 nanorods. Eur J Inorg Chem 2004(6):1165–116810.1002/ejic.200300555 ↗
37. Kuo S-L, Wu N-L (2005) Electrochemical capacitor of MnFe2O4 with NaCl electrolyte. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 8(10):A495–A49910.1149/1.2008847 ↗
38. Weng G-M, Li J, Alhabeb M, Karpovich C, Wang H, Lipton J et al (2018) Layer-by-layer assembly of cross-functional semi-transparent MXene-carbon nanotubes composite films for next-generation electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Func Mater 28(44):1803360. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180336010.1002/adfm.201803360 ↗
39. Younes H, Zou L (2020) Asymmetric configuration of pseudocapacitive composite electrodes for enhanced capacitive deionization. Environmental Science: Water Res Technol10.1039/C9EW01033E ↗
40. Peddis D, Mansilla MV, Mørup S, Cannas C, Musinu A, Piccaluga G et al (2008) Spin-canting and magnetic anisotropy in ultrasmall CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 112(29):8507–851310.1021/jp8016634 ↗
41. Frey NA, Peng S, Cheng K, Sun S (2009) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, functionalization, and applications in bioimaging and magnetic energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 38(9):2532–254210.1039/b815548h ↗
42. Lu AH, EeL Salabas, Schüth F (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angewandte Chemie Int Edition 46(8):1222–4410.1002/anie.200602866 ↗
43. Kolhatkar AG, Jamison AC, Litvinov D, Willson RC, Lee TR (2013) Tuning the magnetic properties of nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 14(8):15977–1600910.3390/ijms140815977 ↗
44. Jun Y-w, Seo J-w, Cheon J (2008) Nanoscaling laws of magnetic nanoparticles and their applicabilities in biomedical sciences. Acc chem Res 41(2):179–8910.1021/ar700121f ↗
45. Guardiaa P, Batlle-Brugala B, Rocab A, Iglesiasa O, Moralesb M, Sernab C, et al (2006) Surfactant effects in monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles of controlled size
46. Al-Saleh MH, Sundararaj U (2009) Electromagnetic interference shielding mechanisms of CNT/polymer composites. Carbon 47(7):1738–174610.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.030 ↗
47. Schulz RB, Plantz V, Brush D (1988) Shielding theory and practice. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 30(3):187–20110.1109/15.3297 ↗
48. Zhao B, Fan B, Xie Y, Zhang R (2015) Effect of particle sizes on the microwave absorption properties of monodispersed Ni submicrospheres. Optik 126(23):4597–460010.1016/j.ijleo.2015.08.095 ↗