journal article·2020-08Open access

Synthesis and characteristics of CMK-3 modified with magnetite nanoparticles for application in hydrogen storage

Lisandro F. Venosta, Juliana M. Juárez, Oscar A. Anunziata, Paula G. Bercoff, Marcos B. Gómez Costa

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 22· Issue 8

Abstract

In this work, we report the synthesis and characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles supported in nanostructured carbon (CMK-3). This material is promising in the application of hydrogen adsorption for energy storage. The material with iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe-CMK-3) was successfully synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction, textural properties analysis, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and magnetization studies. A large amount of the iron incorporated as iron oxide nanoparticles was in the magnetite phase. The incorporation of magnetite on the CMK-3 carbon surface significantly improved the storage capacity of hydrogen (4.45 wt% at 77 K and 10 bar) compared with the CMK-3 framework alone (2.20 wt% at 77 K and 10 bar). The synthesized material is promising for hydrogen adsorption by weak bond forces (physisorption). A hydrogen adsorption mechanism was proposed in which the nanoparticles of magnetite have an important role.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Allen GC, Curtis MT, Hooper AJ, Tucker PM (1974) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of iron–oxygen systems. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 14:1525–1530. https://doi.org/10.1039/DT974000152510.1039/DT9740001525 ↗
2. Anbia M, Ghaffari A (2009) Adsorption of phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions using carbon nanoporous adsorbent coated with polymer. Appl Surf Sci 255:9487–9492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.07010.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.070 ↗
3. Anbia M, Parvin Z (2011) Desulfurization of fuels by means of a nanoporous carbon adsorbent. Chem Eng Res Des 89:641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.01410.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.014 ↗
4. Armoli N, Balzani V (2011) The hydrogen issue. Chem Sus Chem 4:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20100018210.1002/cssc.201000182 ↗
5. Batlle X, Pérez N, Guardia P, Iglesias O, Labarta A, Bartolomé F, Serna CJ (2011) Magnetic nanoparticles with bulklike properties. J Appl Phys 109:07B524. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.355950410.1063/1.3559504 ↗
6. Chaliha S, Bhattacharyya KG (2009) Fe(III)-, Co(II)- and Ni(II)-impregnated MCM41 for wet oxidative destruction of 2,4-dichlorophenol in water. Catal Today 141:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.03.01110.1016/j.cattod.2008.03.011 ↗
7. Darmstadt H, Roy C, Kaliaguine S, Kim TW, Ryoo R (2003) Surface and pore structures of CMK-5 ordered mesoporous carbons by adsorption and surface spectroscopy. Chem Mater 15:3300–3307. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm020673b10.1021/cm020673b ↗
8. Ding W, Zhu W, Xiong J, Yang L, Wei A, Zhang M, Li H (2015) Novel heterogeneous iron-based redox ionic liquid supported on SBA-15 for deep oxidative desulfurization of fuels. Chem Eng J 266:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.04010.1016/j.cej.2014.12.040 ↗
9. Dong J, Wang X, Xu H, Zhao Q, Li J, Dong J, Wang X, Xu H, Zhao Q, Li J (2007) Hydrogen storage in several microporous zeolites. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:4998–5004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.009 ↗
10. Dutta S (2014) A review on production, storage of hydrogen and its utilization as an energy resource. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.03710.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.037 ↗
11. Froudakis GE (2011) Hydrogen storage in nanotubes & nanostructures. Mater Today 14:324–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70162-610.1016/S1369-7021(11)70162-6 ↗
12. Gardner SD, Singamsetty CSK, Booth GL, He G (1995) Surface characterization of carbon fibers using angle-resolved XPS and ISS. Carbon 33:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)00144-O10.1016/0008-6223(94)00144-O ↗
13. Giasafaki D, Bourlinos A, Charalambopoulou G, Stubos A, Steriotis TH (2012) Synthesis and characterisation of nanoporous carbon–metal composites for hydrogen storage. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 154:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.01110.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.011 ↗
14. Giraudet S, Zhu Z (2011) Hydrogen adsorption in nitrogen enriched ordered mesoporous carbons doped with nickel nanoparticles. Carbon 49:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.03510.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.035 ↗
15. Gómez Costa MB, Juárez JM, Martínez ML, Beltramone AR, Cussa J, Anunziata OA (2013) Synthesis and characterization of conducting polypyrrole/SBA-3 and polypyrrole/Na–AlSBA-3 composites. Mat Res Bull 48:661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.03010.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.030 ↗
16. Gómez Costa MB, Juárez JM, Pecchi G, Anunziata OA (2017) Anatase–CMK-3 nanocomposite development for hydrogen uptake and storage. Bull Mater Sci 40:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1382-410.1007/s12034-017-1382-4 ↗
17. Hawn DD, DeKoven BM (1987) Deconvolution as a correction for photoelectron inelastic energy losses in the core level XPS spectra of iron oxides. Surf Interface Anal 10:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.74010020310.1002/sia.740100203 ↗
18. Hirscher M, Panella B, Schmitz B (2010) Metal-organic frameworks for hydrogen storage. Micropor Mesopor Mater 129:335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.06.00510.1016/j.micromeso.2009.06.005 ↗
19. Hoang TKA, Antonelli DM (2009) Exploiting the Kubas interaction in the design of hydrogen storage materials. Adv Mater 21:1787–1800. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20080283210.1002/adma.200802832 ↗
20. Joo SH, Jun S, Ryoo R (2001) Synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon molecular sieves CMK-1. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 44:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(01)00179-210.1016/S1387-1811(01)00179-2 ↗
21. Juárez JM, Gómez Costa MB, Anunziata OA (2015a) Synthesis and characterization of Pt-CMK-3 hybrid nanocomposite for hydrogen storage. Int J Energy Res 39:128–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.322910.1002/er.3229 ↗
22. Juárez JM, Gómez MB, Anunziata OA, (2015b) Preparation and characterization of activated CMK-1 with Zn and Ni species applied in hydrogen storage. Int J Energy Res 39:941- Juárez JM 953. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.329810.1002/er.3298 ↗
23. Juárez JM, Ledesma BC, Gómez Costa MB, Beltramone AR, Anunziata OA (2017) Novel preparation of CMK-3 nanostructured material modified with titania applied in hydrogen uptake and storage. Microporous and Mesoporous Mater 254:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.05610.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.056 ↗
24. Juárez JM, Gómez Costa MB, Martínez ML, Anunziata OA (2019) Influence of vanadium nanoclusters in hydrogen uptake using hybrid nanostructured materials. J Porous Mater 26:951–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-018-0689-x10.1007/s10934-018-0689-x ↗
25. Jun S, Hoo JS, Ryoo R, Kruk M, Jaroniec M, Liu Z, Ohsuna T, Terasaki O (2000) Synthesis of new, nanoporous carbon with hexagonally ordered mesostructure. J Am Chem Soc 122:10712–10713. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja002261e10.1021/ja002261e ↗
26. Kim BJ, Park SJ (2011) Optimization of the pore structure of nickel/graphite hybrid materials for hydrogen storage. Int J Hydrogen Ener 36:648–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.09710.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.097 ↗
27. Kim BJ, Lee YS, Park SJ (2008) Preparation of platinum-decorated porous graphite nanofibers, and their hydrogen storage behaviors. Colloid Interface Sci 318:530–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.01810.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.018 ↗
28. Langmi HW, Ren J, North B, Mathe M, Bessarabov D (2014) Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks: a review. Electrochim Acta 128:368–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.19010.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.190 ↗
29. Li Y, Yang RT (2006) Hydrogen storage in metal−organic frameworks by bridged hydrogen spillover. J Am Chem Soc 128:8136–8137. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja061681m10.1021/ja061681m ↗
30. Liu YY, Zeng JL, Zhang J, Xu F, Sun LX (2007) Improved hydrogen storage in the modified metal-organic frameworks by hydrogen spillover effect. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:4005–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.02910.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.029 ↗
31. Liu C, Li F, Ma LP, Chen HM (2010) Advanced materials for energy storage. Adv Mater 22:28–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20090332810.1002/adma.200903328 ↗
32. Lu A, Li WC, Schmidt W, Schüth F (2005) Template synthesis of large pore ordered mesoporous carbon. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 80:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.12.00710.1016/j.micromeso.2004.12.007 ↗
33. Muhler M, Schlögl R, Ertl G (1992) The nature of the iron oxide-based catalyst for dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene 2. Surface chemistry of the active phase. J Catal 138:413–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(92)90295-S10.1016/0021-9517(92)90295-S ↗
34. Nordfors D, Nilsson A, Martensson N, Svensson S, Gelius U (1991) X-ray excited photoelectron spectra of free molecules containing oxygen. J Electron Spectrosc 56:117–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0368-2048(91)80009-J10.1016/0368-2048(91)80009-J ↗
35. Park SJ, Kim BJ, Lee YS, Cho MJ, Park SJ, Kim BJ, Lee YS, Cho MJ (2008) Influence of copper electroplating on high pressure hydrogen-storage behaviors of activated carbon fibers. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:1706–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.01110.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.011 ↗
36. Ravikovitch PI, Haller GL, Neimark AV (1998) Pore size analysis of MCM-41 type adsorbents by means of nitrogen and argon adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 207:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.574810.1006/jcis.1998.5748 ↗
37. Satyapal S, Petrovic J, Read C, Thomas G, Ordaz G (2007) The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Hydrogen Storage Project: progress towards meeting hydrogen-powered vehicle requirements. Catal Today 120:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.02210.1016/j.cattod.2006.09.022 ↗
38. Suryavanshi U, Iijima T, Hayashia A, Hayashi Y, Tanemura M (2012) Fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles confined in the channels of mesoporous carbon. Chem Eng J 179:388–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.08710.1016/j.cej.2011.10.087 ↗
39. Takasu Y, Unwin R, Tesche B, Bradshaw AM, Grunze M (1978) Photoemission from palladium particle arrays on an amorphous silica substrate. Surf Sci 77:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(78)90003-110.1016/0039-6028(78)90003-1 ↗
40. Tan BJ, Klabunde KJ, Sherwood PM (1990) Studies of Pt-Sn/Al2O3 catalysts prepared by Pt and Sn coevaporation (solvated metal atom dispersion). J Catal 126:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(90)90055-O10.1016/0021-9517(90)90055-O ↗
41. Tang Z, He X, Song Y, Liu L, Guo Q, Yang J (2010) Properties of mesoporous carbons prepared from different carbon precursors using nanosize silica as a template. New Carbon Mater 25:465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(09)60045-710.1016/S1872-5805(09)60045-7 ↗
42. Upadhyay S, Parekh K, Pandey B (2016) Influence of crystallite size on the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Alloys Compd 678:478–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.27910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.279 ↗
43. Venosta L, Bracamonte MV, Rodríguez MC, Jacobo SE, Bercoff PG (2017) Comparative studies of hybrid functional materials based on different carbon structures decorated with nano-magnetite. Suitable application as platforms for enzyme-free electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide. Sens Actuators B Chem 248:460–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.15910.1016/j.snb.2017.03.159 ↗
44. Wang CY, Tsao CS, Yu MS, Liao PY, Chung TY, Wu HC, Miller MA, Tzeng YR (2010) Hydrogen storage measurement, synthesis and characterization of metal–organic frameworks via bridged spillover. J Alloys Compd 492:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.20310.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.203 ↗
45. Weidenthaler C, Lu AH, Schmidt W, Schüth F (2006) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of PAN-based ordered mesoporous carbons (OMC). Micropor Mesopor Mater 88:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.09.01510.1016/j.micromeso.2005.09.015 ↗
46. Yamashita T, Hayes P (2008) Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials. Appl Surf Sci 254:2441–2449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.063 ↗
47. Yang H, Zhao D (2005) Synthesis of replica mesostructures by the nanocasting strategy. Mater Chem 15:1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1039/B414402C10.1039/B414402C ↗
48. Yildirim T, Ciraci S (2005) Titanium-decorated carbon nanotubes as a potential high-capacity hydrogen storage medium. Phys Rev Lett 94:175501–117550. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.17550110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.175501 ↗