Measurement of cluster–cluster interaction in liquids by deposition and AFM of silicon clusters onto HOPG surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
We have investigated the interaction and aggregation of novel fluorescent silicon nanoclusters in liquids by measuring the size distribution of dried clusters on graphite. The clusters were produced by gas aggregation and co-deposition with a beam of water vapour. Drops of the solutions were placed on freshly cleaved highly oriented pyrolitic graphite, subsequently vacuum dried and investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in ultra high vacuum. The AFM images show single clusters and agglomerates. The height distributions are Gaussian-shaped with average heights of 1 nm and widths of 1 nm. The heights never exceed 3 nm. In some regions a second cluster layer is observed. In all samples the separation between first and second layers is larger than the separation between the first layer and the graphite substrate, which we attribute to a stronger interaction between clusters and surface than the cluster self-interaction. We conclude that the separation between first and second layer represents a much better fingerprint of the original size distribution of the clusters in solution than the height of the first layer. The observation of a second cluster layer is important for using silicon clusters as building blocks for cluster-assembled materials.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Bergstrom L (1997) Hamaker constants inorganic materials. Adv Coll Int Sci 70:125–16910.1016/S0001-8686(97)00003-1 ↗
2. Brewer A, von Haeften K (2009) In-situ passivation and blue luminescence of silicon clusters using a cluster beam/H2O co-deposition production method. Appl Phys Lett 94:26110210.1063/1.3167355 ↗
3. Galinis G, Yazdanfar H, Bayliss M, Watkins M, von Haeften K (2012) Towards biosensing via fluorescent surface sites of nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 14:101910.1007/s11051-012-1019-x ↗
4. von Haeften K, Binns C, Brewer A, Crisan O, Howes P, Lowe M, Sibbley-Allen C, Thornton S (2009) A novel approach towards the production of luminescent silicon nanoparticles: sputtering, gas aggregation and co-deposition with H2O. Eur Phys J D 52(1–3):11–1410.1140/epjd/e2009-00024-x ↗
5. Hagelberg F, Xiao C, Marsen B, Lonfat M, Scheier P, Sattler K (2001) Theoretical study of small silicon clusters on a graphite layer. Eur J Phys D 16(1):37–4110.1007/s100530170055 ↗
6. Horcas I, Fernandez R, Gomez-Rodriguez J, Colchero J, Gomez-Herrero J, Baro A (2007) WSXM: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev Sci Instrum 78:01370510.1063/1.2432410 ↗
7. Pratontep S, Carroll S, Xirouchaki C, Streun M, Palmer R (2005) Size-selected cluster beam source based on radio frequency magnetron plasma sputtering and gas condensation. Rev Sci Instr 76:04510310.1063/1.1869332 ↗
8. Sattler K, Mühlbach J, Recknagel E (1980) Generation of metal clusters containing from 2 to 500 atoms. Phys Rev Lett 45(10):821–82410.1103/PhysRevLett.45.821 ↗
9. Tabor D (1991) Gases, liquids, and solids: and other states of matter. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139170253 ↗
10. Torricelli G, Akraiam A, von Haeften K (2011) Size-selecting effect of water on fluorescent silicon clusters. Nanotechnology 22:31571110.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315711 ↗
11. Weldon M, Stefanov B, Raghavachari K, Chabal Y (1997) Initial H2O-induced oxidation of Si (100)–(2 × 1). Phys Rev Lett 79(15):2851–285410.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2851 ↗