Quantitative measurement of nanoparticle release from rubber composites during fabrication and testing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Carbon black has been a key ingredient in high-performance composites, such as tire rubber, for over a hundred years. This reinforcing filler increases rubber rigidity and reduces tire wear, among many other useful effects. New nanomaterials, such as graphene and carbon nanotubes, may bring new performance improvements. However, their usefulness cannot be evaluated unless worker safety is assured by demonstrating that the nanoparticles are not released at harmful concentrations during manufacture and testing. Here, we present a flexible, general method for the quantitative evaluation of nanoparticle release from rubber nanocomposites. We evaluate manufacturing steps such as powder handling, uncured rubber milling, and curing. We also evaluate particle emission during cured rubber abrasion as an aggressive example of the testing rubber goods are subjected to. We quantify released nanoparticle concentrations for clay nanoparticles, graphene-like materials, and carbon nanotubes. We also describe a mechanistic framework based on the balance of adhesive and kinetic energies, which helps understand when nanoparticles are or are not released. This method contributes to the assessment of workers’ exposure to nanoparticles during the various stages of the industrial process, which is an essential step in managing the risk associated with the use of nanomaterials in manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Adachi K, Tainosho Y (2004) Characterization of heavy metal particles embedded in tire dust. Environ Int 30:1009–101710.1016/j.envint.2004.04.004 ↗
2. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2010) Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano 4:5731–573610.1021/nn101390x ↗
3. Bello D, Wardle BL, Yamamoto N, Guzman DeVilloria R, Garcia EJ, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Ellenbecker MJ, Hallock M (2009) Exposure to nanoscale particles and fibers during machining of hybrid advanced composites containing carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 11:231–24910.1007/s11051-008-9499-4 ↗
4. Buchoux J, Bellon L, Marsaudon S, Aimé J-P (2011) Carbon nanotubes adhesion and nanomechanical behavior from peeling force spectroscopy. Eur Phys J B 84(1):69–7710.1140/epjb/e2011-20204-1 ↗
5. Camatini M, Crosta GF, Dolukhanyan T, Sung C, Giuliani G, Corbetta GM, Cencetti S, Regazzoni C (2001) Microcharacterization and identification of tire debris in heterogeneous laboratory and environmental specimens. Mater Charact 46:271–28310.1016/S1044-5803(00)00098-X ↗
6. Cao Z, Stevens MJ, Dobrynin AV (2014) Adhesion and wetting of nanoparticles on soft surfaces. Macromolecules 47:3203–320910.1021/ma500317q ↗
7. Carrillo J-MY, Raphael E, Dobrynin AV (2010) Adhesion of nanoparticles. Langmuir 26:12973–1297910.1021/la101977c ↗
8. Catalán J, Siivola KM, Nymark P, Lindberg H, Suhonen S, Järventaus H, Koivisto AJ, Moreno C, Vanhala E, Wolff H (2016) In vitro and in vivo genotoxic effects of straight versus tangled multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotoxicology 10(6):794–80610.3109/17435390.2015.1132345 ↗
9. Cena LG, Peters TM (2011) Characterization and control of airborne particles emitted during production of epoxy/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J Occup Environ Hyg 8:86–9210.1080/15459624.2011.545943 ↗
10. Chang Y, Yang S-T, Liu J-H, Dong E, Wang Y, Cao A, Liu Y, Wang H (2011) In vitro toxicity evaluation of graphene oxide on A549 cells. Toxicol Lett 200:201–21010.1016/j.toxlet.2010.11.016 ↗
11. Ding Y, Kuhlbusch TAJ, Van Tongeren M, Jiménez AS, Tuinman I, Chen R, Alvarez IL, Mikolajczyk U, Nickel C, Meyer J et al (2017) Airborne engineered nanomaterials in the workplace—a review of release and worker exposure during nanomaterial production and handling processes. J Hazard Mater 322:17–2810.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.075 ↗
12. Donnet J-B, Voet A (1976) Carbon black: physics, chemistry, and elastomer reinforcement
13. Hernández M, del Mar Bernal MI, Verdejo R, Ezquerra TA, López-Manchado MA (2012) Overall performance of natural rubber/graphene nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 73:40–4610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.012 ↗
14. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–5810.1038/354056a0 ↗
15. Ishikawa M, Harada R, Sasaki N, Miura K (2009) Adhesion and peeling forces of carbon nanotubes on a substrate. Phys Rev B 80(19):19340610.1103/PhysRevB.80.193406 ↗
16. Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces
17. Jiang T, Zhu Y (2015) Measuring graphene adhesion using atomic force microscopy with a microsphere tip. Nanoscale 7(24):10760–1076610.1039/C5NR02480C ↗
18. John Howard MD (2013) Occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers - CDC
19. Kendall K, Kendall M, Rehfeldt F (2011) Adhesion of cells, viruses and nanoparticles. Springer, New York10.1007/978-90-481-2585-2 ↗
20. Lee Y-S, Sung J-H, Song K-S, Kim J-K, Choi B-S, Yu I-J, Park J-D (2019) Derivation of occupational exposure limits for multi-walled carbon nanotubes and graphene using subchronic inhalation toxicity data and a multi-path particle dosimetry model. Toxicol Res 8(4):580–58610.1039/C9TX00026G ↗
21. Liao C-M, Chiang Y-H, Chio C-P (2009) Assessing the airborne titanium dioxide nanoparticle-related exposure hazard at workplace. J Hazard Mater 162(1):57–6510.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.020 ↗
22. Liu Y, Song C, Lv G, Chen N, Zhou H, Jing X (2018) Determination of the attractive force, adhesive force, adhesion energy and Hamaker constant of soot particles generated from a premixed methane/oxygen flame by AFM. Appl Surf Sci 433:450–45710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.030 ↗
23. Lo L-M, Hammond D, Bartholomew I, Almaguer D, Heitbrink W, Topmiller J (2011) Engineering controls for nano-scale graphene platelets during manufacturing and handling processes. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
24. Novoselov KS, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth TJ, Khotkevich VV, Morozov SV, Geim AK (2005) Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:10451–1045310.1073/pnas.0502848102 ↗
25. R’mili B, Le Bihan OLC, Dutouquet C, Aguerre-Charriol O, Frejafon E (2013) Particle sampling by TEM grid filtration. Aerosol Sci Technol 47:767–77510.1080/02786826.2013.789478 ↗
26. Riediker M, Zink D, Kreyling W, Oberdörster G, Elder A, Graham U, Lynch I, Duschl A, Ichihara G, Ichihara S (2019) Particle toxicology and health-where are we? Part Fibre Toxicol 16(1):1910.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 ↗
27. Sasidharan A, Panchakarla LS, Chandran P, Menon D, Nair S, Rao CNR, Koyakutty M (2011) Differential nano-bio interactions and toxicity effects of pristine versus functionalized graphene. Nanoscale 3:2461–246410.1039/c1nr10172b ↗
28. Schallamach A (1968) Abrasion, fatigue, and smearing of rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 12:281–29310.1002/app.1968.070120204 ↗
29. Schlagenhauf L, Chu BTT, Buha J, Nüesch F, Wang J (2012) Release of carbon nanotubes from an epoxy-based nanocomposite during an abrasion process. Environ Sci Technol 46:7366–737210.1021/es300320y ↗
30. Skocaj M, Filipic M, Petkovic J, Novak S (2011) Titanium dioxide in our everyday life; is it safe? Radiol Oncol 45(4):227–24710.2478/v10019-011-0037-0 ↗
31. Stern EL, Johnson JW, Vesley D, Halbert MM, Williams LE, Blume P (1974) Aerosol production associated with clinical laboratory procedures. Am J Clin Pathol 62:591–60010.1093/ajcp/62.5.591 ↗
32. Vilgis TA, Heinrich G, Klüppel M (2009) Reinforcement of polymer nano-composites: theory, experiments and applications10.1017/CBO9780511605314 ↗
33. Wohlleben W, Meyer J, Muller J, Müller P, Vilsmeier K, Stahlmecke B, Kuhlbusch TAJ (2016) Release from nanomaterials during their use phase: combined mechanical and chemical stresses applied to simple and multi-filler nanocomposites mimicking wear of nano-reinforced tires. Environ Sci Nano 3:1036–105110.1039/C6EN00094K ↗
34. Xiong D, Fang T, Yu L, Sima X, Zhu W (2011) Effects of nano-scale TiO2, ZnO and their bulk counterparts on zebrafish: acute toxicity, oxidative stress and oxidative damage. Sci Total Environ 409:1444–145210.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.015 ↗
35. Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, Novoselov KS (2012) The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 72:1459–147610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 ↗
36. Zhang H, Dunphy DR, Jiang X, Meng H, Sun B, Tarn D, Xue M, Wang X, Lin S, Ji Z (2012) Processing pathway dependence of amorphous silica nanoparticle toxicity: colloidal vs pyrolytic. J Am Chem Soc 134(38):15790–1580410.1021/ja304907c ↗
37. Zimon AD (1969) Adhesion of dust and powder (trans: corn M). Springer Science & Business Media, London10.1007/978-1-4899-6600-1 ↗