journal article·2016-05Open access

Diversity of TiO2 nanopowders’ characteristics relevant to toxicity testing

Saša Novak, Martina Lorenzetti, Anja Drame, Janja Vidmar, Janez Ščančar, Metka Filipič

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 5

Abstract

In this study, the physicochemical properties of several commercial ultrafine TiO2 powders and their behaviour in the as-received form and colloidal suspensions were analysed. Besides the particle size, the morphology and agglomeration state of the dry powders, dispersibility, ζ-potential and sedimentation in water and in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were studied. Also, leaching of ions from the powders during ageing in physiological solution and the ability of the photoactivated powders to decompose organic substances were evaluated. The examined TiO2 powders revealed diversified characteristics when dispersed in water. In general, while in dry conditions the particle size appeared in the nano-range (down to 32 nm), the particles were agglomerated in aqueous suspensions at pH ~7 and only a minor amount showed dimensions below 200 nm, but none below 100 nm. The inherent pH of the 3 % suspensions varies from 3.7 to 7.5 and the surface charge at these pH values varied from highly positive to highly negative values. In PBS, the surface charge is negative and relatively low for all the samples, which resulted in agglomeration. Five out of six powders exhibited significant photocatalytic activity when exposed to UV irradiation. This also includes one cosmetic-grade powder. Furthermore, during the immersion in aqueous media at physiological temperature, the powders released foreign ions, which might also contribute to the results of cytotoxicity tests. The results revealed the major role of the particle surface charge and its impact on particle dispersion or agglomeration. Due to the high ionic strength in the liquids relevant for cell-surface interaction tests, for all the examined titania powders the nanoparticulate character was lost. However, the presence of impurities and photocatalysis might further contribute to the results of cytotoxicity tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Andersson PO, Lejon C, Ekstrand-Hammarstrom B, Akfur C, Ahlinder L, Bucht A, Osterlund L (2011) Polymorph- and size-dependent uptake and toxicity of TiO(2) nanoparticles in living lung epithelial cells. Small 7(4):514–52310.1002/smll.201001832 ↗
2. Berg JM, Romoser A, Banerjee N, Zebda R, Sayes CM (2009) The relationship between pH and zeta potential of similar to 30 nm metal oxide nanoparticle suspensions relevant to in vitro toxicological evaluations. Nanotoxicology 3(4):276–28310.3109/17435390903276941 ↗
3. Cho M, Chung H, Choi W, Yoon J (2004) Linear correlation between inactivation of E-coli and OH radical concentration in TiO2 photocatalytic disinfection. Water Res 38(4):1069–107710.1016/j.watres.2003.10.029 ↗
4. Committee ES (2011). Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J 9(5)10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2140 ↗
5. Fröhlich E, Teubl Birgit J, Roblegg E (2013) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles and the oral uptake-route. Bio Nano Mater 14:25
6. Gonzalez L, Lison D, Kirsch-Volders M (2008) Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: a critical review. Nanotoxicology 2(4):252–27310.1080/17435390802464986 ↗
7. Hristozov DR, Gottardo S, Critto A, Marcomini A (2012) Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective. Nanotoxicology 6(8):880–89810.3109/17435390.2011.626534 ↗
8. Jaeger A, Weiss DG, Jonas L, Kriehuber R (2012) Oxidative stress-induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of nano-sized titanium dioxide particles in human HaCaT keratinocytes. Toxicology 296(1–3):27–3610.1016/j.tox.2012.02.016 ↗
9. Kaneko M, Okura I, Ed. (2010) Photocatalysis science and technology. Biological and physics series, Springer
10. Kosmulski M (2011) The pH-dependent surface charging and points of zero charge V. Update. J Colloid Interface Sci 353(1):1–1510.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.023 ↗
11. Lai DY (2012) Toward toxicity testing of nanomaterials in the 21st century: a paradigm for moving forward. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 4(1):1–1510.1002/wnan.162 ↗
12. Leroy P, Tournassat C, Bizi M (2011) Influence of surface conductivity on the apparent zeta potential of TiO(2) nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 356(2):442–45310.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.016 ↗
13. Marques RRN, Sampaio MJ, Carrapico PM, Silva CG, Morales-Torres S, Drazic G, Faria JL, Silva AMT (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of caffeine: developing solutions for emerging pollutants. Catal Today 209:108–11510.1016/j.cattod.2012.10.008 ↗
14. Murdock RC, Braydich-Stolle L, Schrand AM, Schlager JJ, Hussain SM (2008) Characterization of nanomaterial dispersion in solution prior to In vitro exposure using dynamic light scattering technique. Toxicol Sci 101(2):239–25310.1093/toxsci/kfm240 ↗
15. Nakagawa Y, Wakuri S, Sakamoto K, Tanaka N (1997) The photogenotoxicity of titanium dioxide particles. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 394(1–3):125–13210.1016/S1383-5718(97)00126-5 ↗
16. Petkovic J, Kuzma T, Rade K, Novak S, Filipic M (2011a) Pre-irradiation of anatase TiO2 particles with UV enhances their cytotoxic and genotoxic potential in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. J Hazard Mater 196:145–15210.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.004 ↗
17. Petkovic J, Zegura B, Stevanovic M, Drnovsek N, Uskokovic D, Novak S, Filipic M (2011b) DNA damage and alterations in expression of DNA damage responsive genes induced by TiO(2) nanoparticles in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Nanotoxicology 5(3):341–35310.3109/17435390.2010.507316 ↗
18. Reeves JF, Davies SJ, Dodd NJF, Jha AN (2008) Hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot) are associated with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 640(1–2):113–12210.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.12.010 ↗
19. Skocaj M, Filipic M, Petkovic J, Novak S (2011) Titanium dioxide in our everyday life; is it safe? Radiol Oncol 45(4):227–24710.2478/v10019-011-0037-0 ↗
20. Tantra R, Tompkins J, Quincey P (2010) Characterisation of the de-agglomeration effects of bovine serum albumin on nanoparticles in aqueous suspension. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 75(1):275–28110.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.049 ↗
21. Teubl BJ, Leitinger G, Schneider M, Lehr C-M, Froehlich E, Zimmer A, Roblegg E (2015) The buccal mucosa as a route for TiO2 nanoparticle uptake. Nanotoxicology 9(2):253–26110.3109/17435390.2014.921343 ↗
22. Uchino T, Tokunaga H, Ando M, Utsumi H (2002) Quantitative determination of OH radical generation and its cytotoxicity induced by TiO2-UVA treatment. Toxicol In Vitro 16(5):629–63510.1016/S0887-2333(02)00041-3 ↗
23. Verma A, Stellacci F (2010) Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small 6(1):12–2110.1002/smll.200901158 ↗
24. Xiong SJ, Tang YX, Ng HS, Zhao XX, Jiang ZL, Chen Z, Ng KW, Loo SCJ (2013) Specific surface area of titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles influences cyto- and photo-toxicity. Toxicology 304:132–14010.1016/j.tox.2012.12.015 ↗