The effects of size, shape, and surface composition on the diffusive behaviors of nanoparticles at/across water–oil interfaces via molecular dynamics simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
We have employed molecular dynamics simulations to systematically investigate the effects of nanoparticles’ structural and chemical properties on their diffusive behaviors at/across the water–benzene interface. Four different nanoparticles were studied: modified hydrocarbon nanoparticles with a mean diameter of 1.2 nm (1.2HCPs), modified hydrocarbon nanoparticles with a mean diameter of 0.6 nm (0.6HCPs), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), and buckyballs. We found that the diffusion coefficients of 0.6 and 1.2HCP were larger than the corresponding values predicted using the Stokes–Einstein (SE) equation and attributed this deviation to the small particle size and the anisotropy of the interface system. In addition, the observed directional diffusive behaviors for various particles were well-correlated with the derivative of the potential of mean force (PMF), which might indicate an effective driving force for the particles along the direction perpendicular to the interface. We also found that nanoparticles with isotropic shape and uniform surface, e.g., buckyballs, tend to have smaller diffusion coefficients than those of nanoparticles with comparable dimensions but anisotropic shapes and non-uniform surface composition, e.g., SWCNT and 0.6HCP. One possible hypothesis for this behavior is that the “perfect” isotropic shape and uniform surface of buckyballs result in a better-defined “solvation shell” (i.e., a shell of solution molecules), which leads to a larger “effective radius” of the particle, and thus, a reduced diffusion coefficient.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrievsky GV, Klochkov VK, Bordyuh AB, Dovbeshko GI (2002) Comparative analysis of two aqueous-colloidal solutions of C60 fullerene with help of FTIR reflectance and UV–Vis spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett 364:8–1710.1016/S0009-2614(02)01305-2 ↗
2. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:368410.1063/1.448118 ↗
3. Berendsen HJC, Vanderspoel D, Vandrunen R (1995) GROMACS—a message-passing parallel molecular-dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91:43–5610.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗
4. Bernard P, Binks TSH (2006) Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Binks BP (2002) Particles as surfactants—similarities and differences. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 7:21–4110.1016/S1359-0294(02)00008-0 ↗
6. Binks BP, Lumsdon SO (2000) Influence of particle wettability on the type and stability of surfactant-free emulsions. Langmuir 16:8622–863110.1021/la000189s ↗
7. Chandler D (1978) Statistical mechanics of isomerization dynamics in liquids and the transition state approximation. J Chem Phys 68:295910.1063/1.436049 ↗
8. Chandler D (2005) Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437:640–64710.1038/nature04162 ↗
9. Chen S-H (1982) Tracer diffusion in polyatomic liquids. III. J Chem Phys 77:254010.1063/1.444125 ↗
10. Cupples HL (1947) Interfacial tension by the ring method: the benzene–water interface. J Phys Colloid Chem 51:1341–134510.1021/j150456a008 ↗
11. Cussler EL (2009) Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511805134 ↗
12. de Folter JWJ, Hutter EM, Castillo SIR, Klop KE, Philipse AP, Kegel WK (2014) Particle shape anisotropy in Pickering emulsions: cubes and peanuts. Langmuir 30:955–96410.1021/la402427q ↗
13. Einstein A (1905) Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann Phys 322:549–56010.1002/andp.19053220806 ↗
14. Frost DS, Dai LL (2011a) Molecular dynamics simulations of nanoparticle self-assembly at ionic liquid a water and ionic liquid a oil interfaces. Langmuir 27:11339–1134610.1021/la202069m ↗
15. Frost DS, Dai LL (2012) Molecular dynamics simulations of charged nanoparticle self-assembly at ionic liquid-water and ionic liquid–oil interfaces. J Chem Phys 136:08470610.1063/1.3684238 ↗
16. Frost DS, Machas M, Dai LL (2012) Molecular dynamics studies on the adaptability of an ionic liquid in the extraction of solid nanoparticles. Langmuir 28:13924–1393210.1021/la302904z ↗
17. Fu C-F, Tian SX (2011) A comparative study for molecular dynamics simulations of liquid benzene. J Chem Theory Comput 7:2240–225210.1021/ct2002122 ↗
18. Garate JA, Perez-Acle T, Oostenbrink C (2014) On the thermodynamics of carbon nanotube single-file water loading: free energy, energy and entropy calculations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:5119–512810.1039/C3CP54554G ↗
19. Goodwin RD (1988) Benzene thermophysical properties from 279 to 900 K at pressures to 1000 bar. J Phys Chem Ref Data 17:154110.1063/1.555813 ↗
20. Hub JS, de Groot BL, van der Spoel D (2010) g_wham—a free weighted histogram analysis implementation including robust error and autocorrelation estimates. J Chem Theory Comput 6:3713–372010.1021/ct100494z ↗
21. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
22. Kirkwood JG (1935) Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures. J Chem Phys 3:30010.1063/1.1749657 ↗
23. Kumar S, Bouzida D, Swendsen R (1992) The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecule. I. The method. J Comput Theory 13:1011–1021
24. Lai B, Oostenbrink C (2012) Binding free energy, energy and entropy calculations using simple model systems. Theor Chem Acc 131:1–13
25. Larin SV, Glova AD, Serebryakov EB, Nazarychev VM, Kenny JM, Lyulin SV (2015) Influence of the carbon nanotube surface modification on the microstructure of thermoplastic binders. RSC Adv 5:51621–5163010.1039/C5RA07851B ↗
26. Lin Y, Skaff H, Emrick T, Dinsmore AD, Russell TP (2003) Nanoparticle assembly and transport at liquid–liquid interfaces. Science 299:226–22910.1126/science.1078616 ↗
27. Luo M, Mazyar OA, Zhu Q, Vaughn MW, Hase WL, Dai LL, March RV, Final I, May F (2006a) Molecular dynamics simulation of nanoparticle self-assembly at a liquid–liquid interface 22:6385–6390
28. Luo M, Mazyar OA, Zhu Q (2006b) Molecular dynamics simulation of nanoparticle self-assembly at a liquid–liquid interface. Langmuir 22:6385–639010.1021/la0607196 ↗
29. Luo M, Song Y, Dai LL (2009) Heterogeneous or competitive self-assembly of surfactants and nanoparticles at liquid–liquid interfaces. Mol Simul 35:773–78410.1080/08927020902769851 ↗
30. Ma H, Dai LL (2007) Particle-laden emulsions. In: Taylor & Francis Online: particle laden emulsions—encyclopedia of surface and colloid science, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis, pp 1–17
31. Malde AK, Zuo L, Breeze M, Stroet M, Poger D, Nair PC, Oostenbrink C, Mark AE (2011) An automated force field topology builder (ATB) and repository: version 1.0. J Chem Theory Comput 7:4026–403710.1021/ct200196m ↗
32. Mazyar OA, Hase WL (2006) Dynamics and kinetics of heat transfer at the interface of model diamond [111] nanosurfaces. J Phys Chem A 110:526–53610.1021/jp0521961 ↗
33. Moreira NH, Skaf MS. (2004) Structural characterization of the H2O/CCl4 liquid interface using molecular dynamics simulations. Progr Colloid Polym Sci10.1007/b97086 ↗
34. Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25:1656–167610.1002/jcc.20090 ↗
35. Roux B (1995) The calculation of the potential of mean force using computer simulations. Comput Phys Commun 91:275–28210.1016/0010-4655(95)00053-I ↗
36. Russo D, Hura G, Head-Gordon T (2004) Hydration dynamics near a model protein surface. Biophys J 86:1852–186210.1016/S0006-3495(04)74252-6 ↗
37. Schmid N, Eichenberger AP, Choutko A, Riniker S, Winger M, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (2011) Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7. Eur Biophys J 40:843–85610.1007/s00249-011-0700-9 ↗
38. Song Y, Luo M, Dai LL (2010) Understanding nanoparticle diffusion and exploring interfacial nanorheology using molecular dynamics simulations. Langmuir 26:5–910.1021/la901902t ↗
39. Storm D, Sheu E (1995) Characterization of colloidal asphaltenic particles in heavy oil. Fuel 74:1140–114510.1016/0016-2361(95)00062-A ↗
40. Tarimala S, Dai LL (2004) Structure of microparticles in solid-stabilized emulsions. Langmuir 20:3492–349410.1021/la036129e ↗
41. Tuteja A, Mackay ME, Narayanan S (2007) Breakdown of the continuum Stokes–Einstein relation for nanoparticle diffusion. Nano Lett 7:1276–128110.1021/nl070192x ↗
42. van der Spoel D, van Maaren PJ, Caleman C (2012) GROMACS molecule & liquid database. Bioinformatics 28:752–75310.1093/bioinformatics/bts020 ↗
43. Wong-Ekkabut J, Karttunen M (2012) Assessment of common simulation protocols for simulations of nanopores, membrane proteins, and channels. J Chem Theory Comput 8:2905–291110.1021/ct3001359 ↗
44. Zhang Y, Feller SE, Brooks BE, Pastor RW (1995) Computer simulation of liquid/liquid interfaces. I. Theory and application to octane/water. J Chem Phys 103:10252–1026610.1063/1.469927 ↗
45. Zhang L, Wang L, Kao Y (2007) Mapping hydration dynamics around a protein surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18461–1846610.1073/pnas.0707647104 ↗