Journal information flow in nanotechnology
Source abstract
Abstract
The nanotechnology development is accompanied by an intensive growth of information flow which is specially noticeable as applied to journal information flow. Now over the world there are the 69 nano-titled journals with the impact factor and/or a settled periodicity as well as the 70 those which lack stability periodicity and are in an organization stage. Only 49 nano-titled have the impact factor with the comparatively high mean value of about 3.44. The domestic nano-titled journals published in Russia, India, China, and other countries are also considered. The attention is taken that in the 2006–2010 period the 95 new nano-titled journals were organized and in 2011 this process is continuing and seems to be the most impressive. Many nano-related journals (including classical physical, chemical and materials science ones) are also described and discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanotechnology research and applications · Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis · E-Learning and Knowledge Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrievski RA (2007a) Information problems in the nanotechnology field. Mater Sci Nanostruct 1:109–116 (in Russian)
2. Andrievski RA (2007b) Information flows in the nanotechnology field. Russ Nanotechnol 2(11–12):6–10 (in Russian)
3. Andrievski RA, Khachoyan AV (2002) Afterword. In: Andrievski RA (ed) Russian translation of book by Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (eds) (2000). Nanotechnology research directions: vision for nanotechnology R&D in the next decade, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 267–276 (in Russian)
4. Bassecoulard E, Lelu A, Zitt M (2007) Mapping nanoscience by citation flows: a preliminary analysis. Scientometrics 70(3):859–88010.1007/s11192-007-0315-1 ↗
5. Braun T, Zsindely S, Diospatonyl I, Zador E (2007) Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics 70(3):651–66710.1007/s11192-007-0306-2 ↗
6. Chen H, Roco MC (2009) Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge global and longitudinal patent and literature analysis. Springer, New York
7. Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2011) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technnol Transf 36:145–17210.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 ↗
8. Hullmann A (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1(11):81–8310.1038/nnano.2006.110 ↗
9. Kostoff RN, Stump IA, Johnson D, Murday JS, Lau CGY, Tolles WM (2006) The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 8(3):301–31110.1007/s11051-005-9035-8 ↗
10. Kostoff RN, Koytcheff RG, Lau CGY (2008) Structure of the nanoscience and nanotechnology application literature. J Technnol Transf 33(5):472–48410.1007/s10961-007-9042-2 ↗
11. Leydesdorff L (2008) The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: a most recent update. Scientometrics 76(1):159–16710.1007/s11192-007-1889-3 ↗
12. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 13(2):427–44510.1007/s11051-010-0192-z ↗
13. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (eds) (2000) Nanotechnology research directions: vision for nanotechnology R&D in the next decade. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
14. Shapira P, Wang J (2010) Follow the money. Nature 468:627–62810.1038/468627a ↗
15. Terekhov AI (2009) The quantitative estimation of nanotechnology development. Russ Nanotechnol 4(11–12):52–55 (in Russian)
16. Youtie J, Shapira P, Porter AL (2008) Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. J Nanopart Res 10:981–98610.1007/s11051-008-9360-9 ↗
17. Zibareva IV, Zibarev AV, Bouznik VM (2010) Russian nanoscience: bibliometric analysis on the basis of STN International. Chem Sustain Dev 18(2):215–227