From quenched to unquenched orbital magnetic moment on metallic@oxide nanoparticles: dc magnetic properties and electronic correlation
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the correlation between magnetic, structure, and electronic properties of Ag@Fe3O4 hetero nanostructures are presented. These nanostructures were prepared using a two-step new chemical approach. Three different nanoparticle sys- tems with different Ag concentrations have been prepared and characterized using high resolution transmission electron microscopy, dc magnetization (magnetization and coercive field as a function of temperature), X-ray absorption near edge spectros- copy, and magnetic circular dichroism studies (XMCD). From the correlation between XMCD and dc magnetic measurements (Verwey transition) the presence of non-stoichiometric magnetite in Ag@Fe3O4 nanoparticle systems was confirmed. From the spin and orbital contribution to the total magnetic moment, we conclude that the sample with less Ag seeds particle concentration presents a non-quenched orbital contribution. These phenomena were analyzed based on the actual models and correlated with dc magnetic properties. From these, we conclude that the enhancement on the orbital contribution increases the spin orbital interaction, also increasing the magneto- crystalline anisotropy reflected on the dc magnetic properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Aragón R, Honig JM (1988) Mean-field model of the Verwey transition in magnetite. Phys Rev B 37:209–218. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.20910.1103/PhysRevB.37.209 ↗
2. Aragón R, Butterey D, Shephered JP, Honig JM (1985) Influence of nonstoichiometry on the Verwey transition. Phys Rev B 31:430. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.43010.1103/PhysRevB.31.430 ↗
3. Aragón R, Butterey D, Shephered JP, Honig JM (1993) Stoichiometry, percolation, and Verwey ordering in magnetite. Phys Rev lett 70:1635–1638. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.163510.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1635 ↗
4. Arruebo M, Fernandez-Pacheco N, Ibarra R, Santamaría MR (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 2:23–33. doi: 10.1016/S1748-0132(07)70084-110.1016/S1748-0132(07)70084-1 ↗
5. Chen CT , Idzerda YU, Lin HJ, Smith NV, Meigs G, Chaban E, Ho GH, Pellegrin E, Sette F (1995) Experimental confirmation of the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism sum rules for iron and cobalt. Phys Rev Lett 75:152–155. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.15210.1103/PhysRevLett.75.152 ↗
6. Figueiredo JJS, Basilio R, Landers R, Garcia F, de Siervo A (2009) A new ultra-high-vacuum variable temperature and high-magnetic-field X-ray magnetic circular dichroism facility at LNLS. J Sync Rad 16:346–351. doi: 10.1107/S090904950900243X10.1107/S090904950900243X ↗
7. Forloni G (2012) Responsible nanotechnology development. J Nanopart Res 14:100710.1007/s11051-012-1007-1 ↗
8. Goya G, Grazu V, Ibarra MR (2008) Magnetic nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Curr Nanosci 4(1):1–16. doi: 10.2174/15734130878359186110.2174/157341308783591861 ↗
9. Honig JM (1995) Analysis of the Verwey transition in magnetite. J Alloys Compd 229(1):24–39. doi: 10.1016/0925-8388(95)01677-510.1016/0925-8388(95)01677-5 ↗
10. Hsu JH, Chen SY, Chang WM, Jian TS, Chang CR, Lee SF (2003) Magnetoresistance effect in AgFe3O4 and AlFe3O4 composite films. J Appl Phys 93(10):7702–7704. doi: 10.1063/1.154015110.1063/1.1540151 ↗
11. Huang DJ, Chang CF, Jeng HT, Guo GY, Lin HJ, Wu WB, Ku HC, Fujimori A, Takahashi Y, Chen CT (2004) Spin and orbital magnetic moments of Fe3O4. Phys Rev Lett 93:077204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.07720410.1103/PhysRevLett.93.077204 ↗
12. Knobel D, Nunes WC, Socolovsky LM, De Biasi E, Vargas JM, Denardin JC (2008) Superparamagnetism and other magnetic features in granular materials: a review on ideal and real systems. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:2836–2857. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2008.01710.1166/jnn.2008.15348 ↗
13. Lee JH, Jang JT, Choi JS, Moon SH, Noh SH, Kim JW, Kim JG, Kim IS, Park KI, Cheon J (2011) Exchange-coupled magnetic nanoparticles for efficient heat induction. Nat Nanotechnol 6:418–422. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.9510.1038/nnano.2011.95 ↗
14. Lin Fh, Chen W, Liao YH, Doong Ra, Li Y (2011) Effective approach for the synthesis of monodisperse magnetic nanocrystals and M–Fe3O4 (M = Ag, Au, Pt, Pd) heterostructures. Nano Res 4(12):1223–1232. doi: 10.1007/s12274-011-0173-210.1007/s12274-011-0173-2 ↗
15. Lou, Yu K, Zhang Z, Huang R, Zhu J, Wang Y, Zhu Z (2012) Dual-mode protein detection based on Fe3O4Au hybrid nanoparticles. Nano Res 5(4):272–28210.1007/s12274-012-0207-4 ↗
16. Morrall P, Schedin F, Case GS, Thomas MF, Dudzik E, Van der Laan G, Thornton G (2004) Stoichiometry of Fe3O4(111) ultrathin films on Pt(111). Phys Rev B 67(21):214408-1–214408-7. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.21440810.1103/PhysRevB.67.214408 ↗
17. Muraca D, Sharma SK, Socolovsky LM, de Siervo A, Lopes G, Pirota KR (2012) Influence of silver concentrations on structural and magnetic properties of Ag–Fe3O4 heterodimer. Nanopart J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:6961–6967. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2012.615510.1166/jnn.2012.6155 ↗
18. Nunes WN, Folly WSD, Sinnecker JP, Novak MA (2004) Temperature dependence of the coercive field in single-domain particle systems. Phys Rev B 70:014419-1–014419-6. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.01441910.1103/PhysRevB.70.014419 ↗
19. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J (2003) Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys. 36:R167–R181. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/20110.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 ↗
20. Pérez N, Bartolomé F, García LM, Bartolomé J, Morales MP, Serna CJ, Labarta A, Batlle X (2009) Nanostructural origin of the spin and orbital contribution to the magnetic moment in Fe3x O4 magnetite nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 94(9):093108-1–093108-3. doi: 10.1063/1.309548410.1063/1.3095484 ↗
21. Salado J, Insausti M, Lezama L, Gil de Muro I, Moros M, Pelaz B, Grazu V, de la Fuente JM, Rojo T (2012) Functionalized Fe3O4@Au superparamagnetic nanoparticles: in vitro bioactivity. Nanotechnology 23(31):315102-1–315102-10. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/31/31510210.1088/0957-4484/23/31/315102 ↗
22. Serantes D, Baldomir D, Pereiro M, Botana J, Prida VM, Hernando B, Arias JE, Rivas J (2010) Magnetocaloric effect in magnetic nanoparticle systems: how to choose the best magnetic material? J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(4):2512–2517. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2010.142410.1166/jnn.2010.1424 ↗
23. Sharma SK, Gleyguestone L, Vargas JM, Socolovsky LM, Pirota KR, Knobel M (2012) Synthesis of Ag–CoFe2O4 dimer colloidal nanoparticles and enhancement of their magnetic response. J Appl Phys 109(7):07B530-1–07B530-3. doi: 10.1063/1.355677110.1063/1.3556771 ↗
24. Shephered JP, Aragón R, Koenitzer JW, Honig JM (1985) Changes in the nature of the Verwey transition in nonstoichiometric magnetite (Fe3O4). Phys Rev B 32:1818–1819. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.181810.1103/PhysRevB.32.1818 ↗
25. Shephered JP, Koenitzer JW, Aragn R, Spalek J, Honig JM (1991) Heat capacity and entropy of nonstoichiometric magnetite Fe3(1 − δ)O4: the thermodynamic nature of the Verwey transition. Phys Rev B 43:8461847. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.846110.1103/PhysRevB.43.8461 ↗
26. Verwey EJW (1939) Electronic conduction of magnetite (Fe3O4) and its transition point at low temperatures. Nature 144:327–328. doi: 10.1038/144327b010.1038/144327b0 ↗
27. Verwey EJW, Haayman PW (1941) Electronic conductivity and transition point of magnetite (Fe3O4). Physica 8:979–987. doi: 10.1016/S0031-8914(41)80005-610.1016/S0031-8914(41)80005-6 ↗
28. Wang C, Yin H, Dai S, Sun S (2010) A general approach to noble metal–metal oxide dumbbell nanoparticles and their catalytic application for CO oxidation. Chem Mater 22(10):3277–3282. doi: 10.1021/cm100603r10.1021/cm100603r ↗