journal article·2011-02

Evaluation of a soft X-ray unipolar charger for charging nanoparticles

Dae Seong Kim, Yong Min Kim, Yong Taek Kwon, Kihong Park

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 13· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Three types of unipolar chargers (parallel multi-electrodes, single electrode, and single electrode with compact size) using the soft X-ray were constructed and their charging performance was evaluated by measuring positive, negative, and neutral fractions of size-resolved ultrafine particles (20–100 nm) with the Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (TDMA) technique. The unipolar charger with a single electrode and compact size showed the highest charge fraction with least particle loss probably due to lower electrostatic loss of ions among tested chargers. With positive voltage applied to electrode to remove negative ions, we found that the positively charged particles were 43, 52, 62, 69, and 75% for 20, 30, 50, 70, and 100-nm particles, respectively, and a few particles were negatively charged although their fraction increased with size (1, 2, 4, 5, and 6% for 20, 30, 50, 70, and 100-nm particles, respectively). The positive charge fractions were about three times higher than the values estimated theoretically from a bipolar charger. Also, based on comparison of current data with previously reported values using corona discharge unipolar charger, the soft X-ray charger showed better performance in terms of charging efficiency and penetration for particles (NaCl) currently tested in the particle size range of 20–100 nm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Borra JP, Goldman A, Goldman M, Boulaud D (1998) Electrical discharge regimes and aerosol production in point-to-plane dc high-pressure cold plasmas: aerosol production by electrical discharges. J Aerosol Sci 29:661–67410.1016/S0021-8502(97)00453-9 ↗
2. Buscher P, Schmidt-Ott A, Wiedensohler A (1994) Performance of a unipolar ‘square wave’ diffusion charger with variable nt-product. J Aerosol Sci 25:651–66310.1016/0021-8502(94)90006-X ↗
3. Chen J, Davidson JH (2002) Ozone production in the positive DC corona discharge: model and comparison to experiments. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 22:495–52210.1023/A:1021315412208 ↗
4. Chen D-R, Pui DYH (1999) A high efficiency, high throughput unipolar aerosol charger for nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 1:115–12610.1023/A:1010087311616 ↗
5. Flagan RC (1998) History of electrical aerosol measurements. Aerosol Sci Technol 28:301–38010.1080/02786829808965530 ↗
6. Fuchs NA (1963) On the stationary charge distribution on aerosol particles in a bipolar ionic atmosphere. Pure Appl Geophys 56:185–19310.1007/BF01993343 ↗
7. Han B, Shimada M, Choi M, Okuyama K (2003) Unipolar charging of nanosized aerosol particles using soft X-ray photoionization. Aerosol Sci Technol 37:330–34110.1080/02786820300962 ↗
8. Kim YM, Kim DS, Yoon JU, Kwon YT, Ahn KH (2007) Development and performance evaluation of soft x-ray chargers. In: Abstracts of the 5th Asian aerosol conference, pp 140–141
9. Kruis FE, Fissan H (2001) Nanoparticle charging in a twin Hewitt charger. J Nanopart Res 3:39–5010.1023/A:1011425816983 ↗
10. Kwon SB, Sakurai H, Seto T, Kim YJ (2006) Charge neutralization of submicron aerosols using surface-discharge microplasma. J Aerosol Sci 37:483–49910.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.05.007 ↗
11. Marjamäki M, Keskinen J, Chen D-R, Pui DYH (2000) Performance evaluation of the electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI). J Aerosol Sci 31:249–26110.1016/S0021-8502(99)00052-X ↗
12. McMurry PH (2000) A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements. Atmos Environ 34:1959–199910.1016/S1352-2310(99)00455-0 ↗
13. McMurry PH, Ghimire A, Ahn H-K, Sakurai H, Moore K, Stolzenburg M, Smith JN (2009) Sampling nanoparticles for chemical analysis by low resolution electrical mobility classification. Environ Sci Technol 43:4653–465810.1021/es8029335 ↗
14. Park K, Kim JS, Park SH (2009) Measurements of hygroscopicity and volatility of atmospheric ultrafine particles during ultrafine particle formation events at urban, industrial, and coastal Sites. Environ Sci Technol 43:6710–671610.1021/es900398q ↗
15. Pui DYH, Fruin S, McMurry PH (1988) Unipolar diffusion charging of ultrafine aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol 8:173–18710.1080/02786828808959180 ↗
16. Qi C, Chen D-R, Greenberg P (2008) Performance study of a unipolar aerosol mini-charger for a personal nanoparticle sizer. J Aerosol Sci 39:450–45910.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.01.003 ↗
17. Radar DJ, McMurry PH (1986) Application of the tandem differential mobility analyzer to studies of droplet growth or evaporation. J Aerosol Sci 17:771–78710.1016/0021-8502(86)90031-5 ↗
18. Shimada M, Han B, Okuyama K, Otani Y (2002) Bipolar charging of aerosol nanoparticles by a soft X-ray photoionizer. J Chem Eng Jpn 35:786–79310.1252/jcej.35.786 ↗
19. Sierra AH, Alguacil FJ, Alonso M (2003) Unipolar charging of nanometer aerosol particles in a corona ionizer. J Aerosol Sci 34:733–74510.1016/S0021-8502(03)00033-8 ↗
20. Stommel YG, Riebel U (2004) A new corona discharge-based aerosol charger for submicron particles with low initial charge. J Aerosol Sci 35:1051–106910.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.03.005 ↗
21. Viner AS, Lawless PA, Ensor DS, Sparks LE (1992) Ozone generation in dc-energized electrostatic precipitators. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 28:504–51210.1109/28.137427 ↗
22. Wiedenshler A, B¨uscher P, Hansson H-C, Martinsson BG, Stratmann F, Ferron G, Busch B (1994) A novel unipolar charger for ultrafine aerosol particles with minimal particle losses. J Aerosol Sci 25:639–64910.1016/0021-8502(94)90005-1 ↗
23. Wiedensohler A (1988) An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range. J Aerosol Sci 19:387–38910.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9 ↗