Particle size prediction of magnesium nanoparticle produced by inert gas condensation method
Source abstract
Abstract
Properties of nanoparticles are normally depending on particle size; therefore, developing a model to predict particle size is of vital importance. This paper established an energy analysis model to predict average particle size of magnesium nanoparticles fabricated by inert gas condensation method. Predictions of average particle size ranging from 20 to 50 nm by energy analysis model have relative errors of less than 10% compared with experimental research. Further, the model is applied to investigate operation conditions to decrease the average particle size of magnesium nanoparticles. It is found that decreasing the absolute pressure in the condensation room and increasing the temperature rise of the inert gas can both produce nanoparticles with smaller average particle sizes. Temperature rise of the inert gas plays a more important role in effect on average nanoparticle size than the absolute pressure in the condensation room. Energy transformed by collision bonding and dissipated by convection are the dominant processes for particle growth when number of atoms in one particle is greater than 2000 atoms.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashcroft NW, Mermin ND (1976) Solid state physics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
2. Atkins P, de Paula J (2006) Atkins’ physical chemistry. 8th edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
3. Bérubé V, Radtke G, Dresselhaus M, Chen G (2007) Size effects on the hydrogen storage properties of nanostructured metal hydrides: a review. Int J Energy Res 31:637–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.128410.1002/er.1284 ↗
4. Bhatnagar PL, Gross EP, Krook M (1954) A model for collision processes in gases. I. Small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems. Phys Rev 94:511–525. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.94.51110.1103/PhysRev.94.511 ↗
5. Corradini PG, Pires FI, Paganin VA, Perez J, Antolini E (2012) Effect of the relationship between particle size, inter-particle distance, and metal loading of carbon supported fuel cell catalysts on their catalytic activity. J Nanoparticle Res:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1080-510.1007/s11051-012-1080-5 ↗
6. Cui S, Gao Z-q, Shen X-d, Lin B-l (2010) Preparation of ultrafine Mg powders with evaporation and condensation method. J Univ Sci Technol Beijing 32:484–487
7. de Jongh PE, Wagemans RWP, Eggenhuisen TM, Dauvillier BS, Radstake PB, Meeldijk JD, Geus JW, de Jong KP (2007) The preparation of carbon-supported magnesium nanoparticles using melt infiltration. Chemistry of Materials 19(24):6052–6057. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm702205v10.1021/cm702205v ↗
8. Howell JR, Siegel R, Menguc MP (2010) Thermal radiation heat transfer, 5th edn. CRC Press, Baca Raton10.1201/9781439894552 ↗
9. Israelachvili JN (2012) Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd edn. Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd., China
10. Itikawa Y (1973) Effective collision frequency of electrons in gases. Physics of Fluids 16(6):5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.169443510.1063/1.1694435 ↗
11. Kalidindi SB, Jagirdar BR (2009) Highly monodisperse colloidal magnesium nanoparticles by room temperature digestive ripening. Inorganic Chemistry 48(10):4524–4529. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic900357710.1021/ic9003577 ↗
12. Kim KC, Dai B, Karl Johnson J, Sholl DS (2009) Assessing nanoparticle size effects on metal hydride thermodynamics using the Wulff construction. Nanotechnology 20(20):7. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/20/20400110.1088/0957-4484/20/20/204001 ↗
13. Kooi BJ, Palasantzas G, De Hosson JTM (2006) Gas-phase synthesis of magnesium nanoparticles: a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy study. Appl Phys Lett 89(16):3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.235886010.1063/1.2358860 ↗
14. Krishnan G, Kooi BJ, Palasantzas G, Pivak Y, Dam B (2010) Thermal stability of gas phase magnesium nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 107(5):7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.330545310.1063/1.3305453 ↗
15. Krishnan G, Verheijen MA, ten Brink GH, Palasantzas G, Kooi BJ (2013) Tuning structural motifs and alloying of bulk immiscible Mo-Cu bimetallic nanoparticles by gas-phase synthesis. Nanoscale 5(12):5375–5383. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00565h10.1039/c3nr00565h ↗
16. Kumar S, Gandhi KS, Kumar R (2007) Modeling of formation of gold nanoparticles by citrate method. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(10):3128–3136. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060672j10.1021/ie060672j ↗
17. Kuwana K, Saito K (2005) Modeling CVD synthesis of carbon nanotubes: nanoparticle formation from ferrocene. Carbon 43(10):2088–2095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.01610.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.016 ↗
18. Lim DW, Yoon JW, Ryu KY, Suh MP (2012) Magnesium nanocrystals embedded in a metal-organic framework: hybrid hydrogen storage with synergistic effect on physi- and chemisorption. Angewandte Chemie 51(39):9814–9817. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120605510.1002/anie.201206055 ↗
19. Mueller T, Ceder G (2010) Effect of particle size on hydrogen release from sodium alanate nanoparticles. ACS Nano 4(10):5647–5656. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101224j10.1021/nn101224j ↗
20. Ogawa S, Niwa H, Nomoto T, Yagi S (2010) Fabrication and characterization of magnesium nanoparticle by gas evaporation method. e-Journal of Surf Sci Nanotechnol 8:246–249. https://doi.org/10.1380/ejssnt.2010.24610.1380/ejssnt.2010.246 ↗
21. Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J (2003) Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D: Appl Phys 36(13):R167–R181. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/20110.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 ↗
22. Phuoc TX, Howard BH, Martello DV, Soong Y, Chyu MK (2008) Synthesis of Mg(OH)2, MgO, and Mg nanoparticles using laser ablation of magnesium in water and solvents. Opt Lasers Eng 46(11):829–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.05.01810.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.05.018 ↗
23. Raula J, Kuivanen A, Lähde A, Jiang H, Antopolsky M, Kansikas J, Kauppinen EI (2007) Synthesis of -leucine nanoparticles via physical vapor deposition at varying saturation conditions. J Aerosol Sci 38(12):1172–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.08.00910.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.08.009 ↗
24. Shegai T, Langhammer C (2011) Hydride formation in single palladium and magnesium nanoparticles studied by nanoplasmonic dark-field scattering spectroscopy. Adv Mater 23(38):4409–4414. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110197610.1002/adma.201101976 ↗
25. Song M-R, Chen M, Zhang Z-J (2008) Preparation and characterization of Mg nanoparticles. Mater Charact 59(5):514–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2007.03.00810.1016/j.matchar.2007.03.008 ↗
26. Torrente-Murciano L (2016) The importance of particle-support interaction on particle size determination by gas chemisorption. J Nanoparticle Res: Interdiscip Forum Nanoscale Sci Technol 18:87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3385-210.1007/s11051-016-3385-2 ↗
27. Vernieres J et al (2017) Gas phase synthesis of multifunctional Fe-based nanocubes. Adv Funct Mater 27:1605328. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160532810.1002/adfm.201605328 ↗
28. Vollath D (2011) Estimation of particle size distributions obtained by gas phase processes. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13(9):3899–3909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0343-x10.1007/s11051-011-0343-x ↗
29. Wen Y, Xia D, Xuan W (2017) Modeling for particle size prediction and mechanism of silicon nitride nanoparticle synthesis by chemical vapor deposition. Aerosol Sci Technol 51(7):845–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.130793910.1080/02786826.2017.1307939 ↗
30. Xia D, Wen Y, Ren L, Hu X (2014) Mechanisms of thermal process of zinc ultrafine powder preparation by inert gas condensation. Powder Technol 257:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.06010.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.060 ↗
31. Xu YH, Wang JP (2008) Direct gas-phase synthesis of heterostructured nanoparticles through phase separation and surface segregation. Adv Mater 20(5):994–999. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060289510.1002/adma.200602895 ↗
32. Yagi S et al (2006) Fabrication and characterization of Pd nanoparticles. e-Journal Surf Sci Nanotechnol 4:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1380/ejssnt.2006.25810.1380/ejssnt.2006.258 ↗
33. Zhao J, Baibuz E, Vernieres J, Grammatikopoulos P, Jansson V, Nagel M, Steinhauer S, Sowwan M, Kuronen A, Nordlund K, Djurabekova F (2016) Formation mechanism of Fe nanocubes by magnetron sputtering inert gas condensation. ACS Nano 10(4):4684–4694. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0102410.1021/acsnano.6b01024 ↗
34. Zhao J et al (2015) Crystallization of silicon nanoclusters with inert gas temperature control. Phys Rev B 91. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.03541910.1103/PhysRevB.91.035419 ↗