journal article·2008-12

Effect of chitosan and thiolated chitosan coating on the inhibition behaviour of PIBCA nanoparticles against intestinal metallopeptidases

Irene Bravo-Osuna, Christine Vauthier, Alessandra Farabollini, Gioconda Millotti, Gilles Ponchel

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 10· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Surface modified nanoparticles composed of poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) (PIBCA) cores surrounded by a chitosan and thiolated chitosan gel layer were prepared and characterized in previous works. The presence of such biopolymers on the nanoparticle surface conferred those nanosystems interesting characteristics that might partially overcome the gastrointestinal enzymatic barrier, improving the oral administration of pharmacologically active peptides. In the present work, the antiprotease behaviour of this family of core–shell nanoparticles was in vitro tested against two model metallopeptidases present in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT): Carboxypeptidase A -CP A- (luminal protease) and Leucine Aminopeptidase M -LAP M- (membrane protease). As previous step, the zinc-binding capacity of these nanoparticles was evaluated. Interestingly, an improvement of both the zinc-binding capacity and the antiprotease effect of chitosan was observed when the biopolymers (chitosan and thiolated chitosan) were used as coating component of the core–shell nanoparticles, in comparison with their behaviour in solution, thanks to the different biopolymer chains rearrangement. The presence of amino, hydroxyl and thiol groups on the nanoparticle surface promoted zinc binding and hence the inhibition of the metallopeptidases analysed. On the contrary, the occurrence of a crosslinked structure in the gel layer surrounding the PIBCA cores of thiolated formulations, due to the formation of interchain and intrachain disulphide bonds, partially limited the inhibition of the proteases. The low accessibility of cations to the active groups of the cross-linked polymeric shell was postulated as a possible explanation of this behaviour. Results obtained in this work make this family of surface-modified nanocarriers promising candidates for the successfull administration of pharmacologically active peptides and proteins by the oral route.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Diabetes Treatment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Ameye D, Voorspoels J, Remon JP et al (2000) Optimisation of an in vitro procedure for the determination of the enzymatic inhibition potency of multifunctional polymers. J Control Rel 68:413–41710.1016/S0168-3659(00)00274-1 ↗
2. Ameye D, Voorspoels J, Foreman P et al (2001) Trypsin inhibition, calcium and zinc ion binding of starch-g-poly(acrylic acid) copolymers and starch/poly(acrylic acid) mixtures for peroral peptide drug delivery. J Control Rel 75:357–36410.1016/S0168-3659(01)00408-4 ↗
3. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Krajicek ME (1998) Mucoadhesive polymers as platforms for peroral peptide delivery and absorption: synthesis and evaluation of different chitosan-EDTA conjugates. J Control Rel 50:215–22310.1016/S0168-3659(97)00136-3 ↗
4. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Thaler SC (2000) Polycarbophil-cysteine conjugates as platforms for oral polypeptide delivery systems. J Pharm Sci 89:901–90910.1002/1520-6017(200007)89:7<901::AID-JPS7>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
5. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Hornof M, Guggi D (2004) Thiolated chitosan. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 57:9–1710.1016/S0939-6411(03)00147-4 ↗
6. Bravo-Osuna I, Schmitz T, Bernkop-Schnürch A et al (2006) Elaboration and characterization of thiolated chitosan-coated acrylic nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 316:170–17510.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.037 ↗
7. Bravo-Osuna I, Ponchel G, Vauthier C (2007a) Tuning of shell and core characteristics of chitosan-decorated acrylic nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Sci 30(2):143–15410.1016/j.ejps.2006.10.007 ↗
8. Bravo-Osuna I, Vauthier C, Farabollini A et al (2007b) Mucoadhesion mechanism of chitosan and thiolated chitosan-poly(isobutyl cyanoacrylate) core-shell nanoparticles. Biomaterials 28(13):2233–224310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.005 ↗
9. Bravo-Osuna I, Millotti G, Vauthier C et al (2007c) In vitro evaluation of calcium binding capacity of chitosan and thiolated chitosan poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) core-shell nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 338(1):284–29010.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.01.039 ↗
10. Bravo-Osuna I, Teutonico D, Arpicco S et al (2007d) Characterization of chitosan thiolation and application to thiol quantification onto nanoparticle surface. Int J Pharm 340(1–2):173–18110.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.03.019 ↗
11. Chassary P, Vincent T, Guibal E (2004) Metal anion sorption of chitosan and derivative materials: a strategy for polymer modification and optimum use. React Funct Polym 60:137–14910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.02.018 ↗
12. Chauvierre C, Labarre D, Couvreur P et al (2003a) Radical polymerisation of alkylcyanoacrylates initiated by the redox system dextran-cerium (IV) under acidic aqueous conditions. Macromolecules 36:6018–602710.1021/ma034097w ↗
13. Chauvierre C, Labarre D, Couvreur P et al (2003b) Plug-in spectrometry with optical fibres as a novel analytical tool for nanoparticles technology: application to the investigation of the emulsion polymerisation of the alkylcyanoacrylate. J Nanopart Res 5:365–37110.1023/A:1025575730542 ↗
14. Chauvierre C, Labarre D, Couvreur P et al (2003c) Novel polysaccharide-decorated poly(isobutyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. Pharm Res 20:1786–179310.1023/B:PHAM.0000003376.57954.2a ↗
15. Cho JH, Kim DH, Chung SJ et al (2002) Insight into the stereochemistry in the inhibition of carboxypeptidase A with N-(hydroxyaminocarbonyl)phenylalanine: binding modes of an enantiomeric pair of the inhibitor to Carboxypeptidase A. Bioorg Med Chem 10:2015–202210.1016/S0968-0896(01)00429-1 ↗
16. Grangier JL, Puygrenier M, Gautier JC et al (1991) Nanoparticles as carriers for growth hormone releasing factor. J Control Rel 15:3–1310.1016/0168-3659(91)90098-X ↗
17. Guibal E (2004) Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review. Sep Purif Techn 38:43–7410.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.004 ↗
18. Guibal E, Vincent T, Navarro-Mendoza R (2000) Synthesis and characterization of a thiourea derivative of chitosan for platinum recovery. J Appl Polym Sci 75:199–13410.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000103)75:1<119::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
19. Guibal E, Von Offenberg Sweeney N, Vincent T et al (2002). Sulfur derivatives of chitosan for palladium sorption. React Funct Polym 50:149–16310.1016/S1381-5148(01)00110-9 ↗
20. Hooper NM (1994) Families of zinc metallopeptidases. FEBS Lett 354:1–610.1016/0014-5793(94)01079-X ↗
21. Huang M, Khor E, Lim LY (2004) Uptake and cytotoxicity of chitosan molecules and nanoparticles: effects of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. Pharm Res 21:344–35310.1023/B:PHAM.0000016249.52831.a5 ↗
22. Jung T, Kamm W, Breitenbach A et al (2000) Biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of peptides: is there a role for polymers to affect mucosal uptake? Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50:147–16010.1016/S0939-6411(00)00084-9 ↗
23. Khan T, Peh K, Ch’ng H (2000) Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluation of chitosan films for wound dressing. J Pharm Pharm Sci 3:303:311
24. Lambert G, Fattal E, Brehier A, Feger J, Couvreur P (1998) Effect of polyisobutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles and Lipofectin® loaded with oligonucleotides on cell viability and PKCα neosynthesis in HepG2 cells. Biochim 80:969–97610.1016/S0300-9084(99)80002-9 ↗
25. Lee M, Kim DH (2000) Hippuryl-α-methylphenylalanine and hyppuryl-α-methylphenyllactic acid as substrates for carboxypeptidase A. Synthesis, kinetic evaluation and mechanistic implication. Bioorg Med Chem 8:815–82310.1016/S0968-0896(00)00006-7 ↗
26. Lueβen HL, Verhoef JC, Borchard G, Lehr CM, de Boer AG, Junginger HE (1995) Mucoadhesive polymers in peroral peptide drug delivery. II. Carbomer and polycarbophil are potent inhibitors of the intestinal proteolytic enzyme trypsin. Pharm Res 12:1293–129810.1023/A:1016213405081 ↗
27. Lueβen HL, Leeuw BJ, Pérard D, Lehr CM, de Boer AG, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE (1996) Mucoadhesive polymers in peroral peptide drug delivery. I. Influence of mucoadhesive excipients on the proteolytic activity of intestinal enzymes. Eur J Pharm Sci 4:117–12810.1016/0928-0987(95)00042-9 ↗
28. Lueβen HL, Rentel CO, Kotzé AF, Lehr CM, de Boer AG, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE (1997) Mucoadhesive polymers in peroral peptide drug delivery. IV. Polycarbophil and chitosan are potent enhancers of peptide transport across intestinal mucosae in vitro. J Control Rel 45:15–2310.1016/S0168-3659(96)01536-2 ↗
29. Madsen F, Peppas NA (1999) Complexation graft copolymer networks: swelling properties, calcium binding and proteolytic enzyme inhibition. Biomaterials 20:1701–170810.1016/S0142-9612(99)00071-X ↗
30. Monza da Silveira A, Ponchel G, Puisieux F, Duchêne D (1998) Combined poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) and cyclodextrins nanoparticles for enhancing the encapsulation of lipophilic drugs. Pharm Res 15:1051–105510.1023/A:1011982211632 ↗
31. Prego C, Torres D, Fernández-Megía E, Novoa-Caballal R, Quínoa E, Alonso MJ (2006) Chitosan-PEG nanocapsules as new carriers for oral peptide delivery. Effect of chitosan pegylation degree. J Control Rel 111:299–30810.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.015 ↗
32. Sanderink GJ, Arthur Y, Siest G (1988) Human aminopeptidases: a review of the literature. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 26:795–807
33. Vallee BL, Rupley JA, Coombs TL, Neurath H (1960) The role of zinc in carboxypeptidase. J Biol Chem 235:64–6910.1016/S0021-9258(18)69586-9 ↗
34. Zhou XH (1994) Overcoming enzymatic and absorption barriers to non-parenterally administered protein and peptide drugs. J Control Rel 29:239–25210.1016/0168-3659(94)90071-X ↗