Synthesis of nanorods FePO4 via a facile route
Source abstract
Abstract
Iron phosphate nanorods were synthesized via a novel facile route. The structure, composition, and morphology of the prepared material were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscope (TEM), respectively. The diffraction lines were indexed to the hexagonal structure. The diameter of these nanorods is about in the range of 20–30 nm and the length 50–100 nm. The preferential growth direction of the prepared material was the [100]. The reaction mechanism for the synthesis of FePO4 nanorods was also primarily discussed. Compared to the bulky and the irregular nanoparticles, the nanometer ones will be more fascinating for application in many areas.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Balmer P, Frederiksen OF (1975) A pilot plant scale evaluation of potential precipitants in the secondary precipitation process. Water Res 9:721–72510.1016/0043-1354(75)90063-9 ↗
2. Beale AM, Sankar G (2002) Following the structural changes in iron phosphate catalysts by in situ combined XRD/QuEXAFS technique. J Mater Chem 12:3064–307210.1039/b204059j ↗
3. Boras CA, Romagnoli R, Lezna RO (2000) In-situ spectroelectrochemistry (UV–visible and infrared) of anodic films on iron in neutral phosphate solutions. Electrochim Acta 45:1717–172510.1016/S0013-4686(99)00393-X ↗
4. Cui W, Liu H, Wang C, Xia Y (2008) Highly ordered three-dimensional macroporous FePO4 as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 10:1587–158910.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.037 ↗
5. Du N, Zhang H, Ma X, Li DS, Yang D (2009) Controllable chemical reaction synthesis of Tb(OH)3 nanorods and their photoluminescence property. Mater Lett 63:1180–118210.1016/j.matlet.2009.02.037 ↗
6. Fuhrer MS, Nygard J, Shih L, Forero M, Yoon YG, Mazzoni MSC et al (2000) Crossed nanotube junctions. Science 288:494–49710.1126/science.288.5465.494 ↗
7. Kandori K, Kuwae T, Ishikawa T (2006) Control on size and adsorptive properties of spherical ferric phosphate particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 300:225–23110.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.072 ↗
8. Kickuth R, Tubail K (1976) Defektverbindung und fremdionen-dotierung bei der ausfällung von eisen(II)- und eisen(III)-phosphaten. Geoderma 16:219–23510.1016/0016-7061(76)90024-0 ↗
9. Okada S, Yamamoto T, Okazaki Y, Yamaki JI, Tokunaga M, Nishida T (2005) Cathode properties of amorphous and crystalline FePO4. J Power Sources 146:570–57410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.200 ↗
10. Sides CR, Croce F, Young VY, Martin CR, Scrosati B (2005) A high-rate, nanocomposite LiFePO4/carbon cathode. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 8:A484–A48710.1149/1.1999916 ↗
11. Wang L, Liang GC, Ou XQ, Zhi XK, Zhang JP, Cui JY (2009) Effect of synthesis temperature on the properties of LiFePO4/C composites prepared by carbothermal reduction. J Power Sources 189:423–42810.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.032 ↗
12. Wilhelmy RB, Matijevic E (1987) Preparation and growth kinetics of monodispersed ferric phosphate hydrosols. J Colloids Surf 22:111–13110.1016/0166-6622(87)80214-7 ↗