journal article·2014-04

Entropy-driven structure and dynamics in carbon nanocrystallites

N. W. McNutt, Q. Wang, O. Rios, D. J. Keffer

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 16· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

New carbon composite materials are being developed that contain carbon nanocrystallites in the range of 5–17 A in radius dispersed within an amorphous carbon matrix. Evaluating the applicability of these materials for use in battery electrodes requires a molecular-level understanding of the thermodynamic, structural, and dynamic properties of the nanocrystallites. Herein, molecular dynamics simulations reveal the molecular-level mechanisms for such experimental observations as the increased spacing between carbon planes in nanocrystallites as a function of decreasing crystallite size. As the width of this spacing impacts Li-ion capacity, an explanation of the origin of this distance is relevant to understanding anode performance. It is thus shown that the structural configuration of these crystallites is a function of entropy. The magnitude of out-of-plane ripples, binding energy between layers, and frequency of characteristic planar modes are reported over a range of nanocrystallite sizes and temperatures. This fundamental information for layered carbon nanocrystallites may be used to explain enhanced lithium ion diffusion within the carbon composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Aga RS, Fu CL, Krcmar M, Morris JR (2007) Theoretical investigation of the effect of graphite interlayer spacing on hydrogen absorption. Phys Rev B 76:16540410.1103/PhysRevB.76.165404 ↗
2. Baker DA, Gallego NC, Baker FS (2012) On the characterization and spinning of an organic-purified lignin toward the manufacture of low-cost carbon fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 124(1):227–23410.1002/app.33596 ↗
3. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8(3):902–90710.1021/nl0731872 ↗
4. Dienwiebel M, Verhoeven GS, Pradeep N, Frenken JWM, Heimberg JA, Zandbergen HW (2004) Superlubricity of graphite. Phys Rev Lett 92:12610110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.126101 ↗
5. Dion M, Rydberg H, Schröder E, Langreth DC, Lundqvist BI (2004) Van der Waals density functional for general geometries. Phys Rev Lett 92:24640110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246401 ↗
6. Dmowski W, Contescu CI, Llobet A, Gallego NC, Egami T (2012) Local atomic density of microporous carbons. J Phys Chem C 116(4):2946–295110.1021/jp209824f ↗
7. Fileti EE, Dalpian GM, Rivelino R (2010) Liquid separation by a graphene membrane. J Appl Phys 108(11):11352710.1063/1.3518507 ↗
8. Filippov AE, Dienwiebel M, Frenken JWM, Klafter J, Urbakh M (2008) Torque and twist against superlubricity. Phys Rev Lett 100:04610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.046102 ↗
9. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6(3):183–19110.1038/nmat1849 ↗
10. Hasegawa M, Nishidate K, Iyetomi H (2007) Energetics of interlayer binding in graphite: the semiempirical approach revisited. Phys Rev B 76:11542410.1103/PhysRevB.76.115424 ↗
11. Hawaldar R, Merino P, Correia MR, Bdikin I, Gracio J, Mendez J, Martin-Gago JA, Singh MK (2012) Large-area high-throughput synthesis of monolayer graphene sheet by hot filament thermal chemical vapor deposition. Sci Rep 2:68210.1038/srep00682 ↗
12. Hirano M, Shinjo K (1990) Atomistic locking and friction. Phys Rev B 41(17):11837–1185110.1103/PhysRevB.41.11837 ↗
13. Iijima T, Suzuki K, Matsuda Y (1995) Electrodic characteristics of various carbon materials for lithium rechargeable batteries. Synth Met 73(1):9–2010.1016/0379-6779(95)03290-8 ↗
14. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118(45):11225–1123610.1021/ja9621760 ↗
15. Langford JI, Wilson AJC (1978) Scherrer after 60 years—survey and some new results in determination of crystallite size. J Appl Crystallogr 11(Apr):102–11310.1107/S0021889878012844 ↗
16. Lebedeva IV, Knizhnik AA, Popov AM, Lozovik YE, Potapkin BV (2011) Interlayer interaction and relative vibrations of bilayer graphene. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13(13):5687–569510.1039/c0cp02614j ↗
17. Leontyev IN, Beenov SV, Guterman VE, Haghi-Ashtiani P, Shaganov AP, Dkhil B (2011) Catalytic activity of carbon-supported Pt nanoelectrocatalysts. Why reducing the size of Pt nanoparticles is not always beneficial. J Phys Chem C 115(13):5429–5434. doi: 10.1021/jp110947710.1021/jp1109477 ↗
18. Liu YH, Xue JS, Zheng T, Dahn JR (1996) Mechanism of lithium insertion in hard carbons prepared by pyrolysis of epoxy resins. Carbon 34(2):193–20010.1016/0008-6223(96)00177-7 ↗
19. Marquez A (2007) Molecular dynamics studies of combined carbon/electrolyte/lithium–metal oxide interfaces. Mater Chem Phys 104(1):199–20910.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.03.010 ↗
20. Marquez A, Balbuena PB (2001) Molecular dynamics study of graphite/electrolyte interfaces. J Electrochem Soc 148(6):A624–A63510.1149/1.1372216 ↗
21. Marquez A, Vargas A, Balbuena PB (1998) Computational studies of lithium intercalation in model graphite in the presence of tetrahydrofuran. J Electrochem Soc 145(10):3328–333410.1149/1.1838807 ↗
22. Meyer JC, Geim AK, Katsnelson MI, Novoselov KS, Obergfell D, Roth S, Girit C, Zettl A (2007) On the roughness of single- and bi-layer graphene membranes. Solid State Commun 143(1–2):101–10910.1016/j.ssc.2007.02.047 ↗
23. Nicklow R, Smith HG, Wakabayashi N (1972) Lattice-dynamics of pyrolytic-graphite. Phys Rev B 5(12):4951–496210.1103/PhysRevB.5.4951 ↗
24. Noel M, Suryanarayanan V (2002) Role of carbon host lattices in Li-ion intercalation/de-intercalation processes. J Power Sources 111(2):193–20910.1016/S0378-7753(02)00308-7 ↗
25. Phillips JM, Shrimpton N (1992) Molecular-dynamics study of interlayer incommensurability in adsorbed multilayers. Phys Rev B 45(7):3730–373410.1103/PhysRevB.45.3730 ↗
26. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular-dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
27. Popov AM, Lebedeva IV, Knizhnik AA, Lozovik YE, Potapkin BV (2011) Molecular dynamics simulation of the self-retracting motion of a graphene flake. Phys Rev B 84:24543710.1103/PhysRevB.84.245437 ↗
28. Popov AM, Lebedeva IV, Knizhnik AA, Lozovik YE, Potapkin BV (2012) Barriers to motion and rotation of graphene layers based on measurements of shear mode frequencies. Chem Phys Lett 536:82–8610.1016/j.cplett.2012.03.082 ↗
29. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the art of scientific computing, vol 1, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
30. Qi WH, Huang BY, Wang MP, Yin ZM, Li J (2009) Molecular dynamic simulation of the size- and shape-dependent lattice parameter of small platinum nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 11:575–58010.1007/s11051-008-9392-1 ↗
31. Rai A, Warrier M, Schneider R (2009) A hierarchical multi-scale method to simulate reactive-diffusive transport in porous media. Comput Mater Sci 46(2):469–47810.1016/j.commatsci.2009.03.038 ↗
32. Sasaki N, Kobayashi K, Tsukada M (1996) Atomic-scale friction image of graphite in atomic-force microscopy. Phys Rev B 54(3):2138–214910.1103/PhysRevB.54.2138 ↗
33. Savchenko DV, Ionov SG (2010) Physical properties of carbon composite materials with low percolation threshold. J Phys Chem Solids 71(4):548–55010.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.033 ↗
34. Sharma RK, Wooten JB, Baliga VL, Lin XH, Chan WG, Hajaligol MR (2004) Characterization of chars from pyrolysis of lignin. Fuel 83(11–12):1469–148210.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.015 ↗
35. Shimizu A, Tachikawa H (2003) Molecular dynamics simulation for sodium atom in and on the two layers of C150H30 graphite plane. J Phys Chem Solids 64(12):2397–240210.1016/S0022-3697(03)00279-8 ↗
36. Stuart SJ, Tutein AB, Harrison JA (2000) A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J Chem Phys 112(14):6472–648610.1063/1.481208 ↗
37. Tenhaeff WE, Rios O, More K, McGuire MA (2014) Highly robust lithium ion battery anodes from lignin: an abundant, renewable, and low-cost material. Adv Funct Mater 24(1):86–9410.1002/adfm.201301420 ↗
38. Tsai JL, Tu JF (2010) Characterizing mechanical properties of graphite using molecular dynamics simulation. Mater Des 31(1):194–19910.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.032 ↗
39. Tuckerman M, Berne BJ, Martyna GJ (1992) Reversible multiple time scale molecular-dynamics. J Chem Phys 97(3):1990–200110.1063/1.463137 ↗
40. Verhoeven GS, Dienwiebel M, Frenken JWM (2004) Model calculations of superlubricity of graphite. Phys Rev B 70:16541810.1103/PhysRevB.70.165418 ↗
41. Wang YC, Scheerschmidt K, Gosele U (2000) Theoretical investigations of bond properties in graphite and graphitic silicon. Phys Rev B 61(19):12864–1287010.1103/PhysRevB.61.12864 ↗
42. Wang QF, Keffer DJ, Petrovan S, Thomas JB (2010) Molecular dynamics simulation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) oligomers. J Phys Chem B 114(2):786–79510.1021/jp909762j ↗
43. Warrier M, Schneider R, Salonen E, Nordlund K (2005) Multi-scale modeling of hydrogen isotope transport in porous graphite. J Nucl Mater 337(1–3):580–58410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.017 ↗
44. Winter M, Besenhard JO, Spahr ME, Novak P (1998) Insertion electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv Mater 10(10):725–76310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::AID-ADMA725>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
45. Yoo EJ, Kim J, Hosono E, Zhou H, Kudo T, Honma I (2008) Large reversible Li storage of graphene nanosheet families for use in rechargeable lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett 8(8):2277–228210.1021/nl800957b ↗
46. Zacharia R, Ulbricht H, Hertel T (2004) Interlayer cohesive energy of graphite from thermal desorption of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Phys Rev B 69:15540610.1103/PhysRevB.69.155406 ↗