journal article·2006-08-14Open access

Suppression of particle generation in a plasma process using a sine-wave modulated rf plasma

Nobuki Kashihara, Heru Setyawan, Manabu Shimada, Yutaka Hayashi, Chan Soo Kim, Kikuo Okuyama, Sugeng Winardi

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 8· Issue 3-4

Abstract

Sine-wave modulated rf plasma has been used to control particle generation and growth in a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of silicon dioxide thin films using TEOS/O2. The density and the size of particles generated in the plasma are greatly reduced when the plasma is modulated with sine-wave modulation at low modulation frequency (<1000 Hz). In addition, particle contamination on the films is significantly reduced also for nanoparticles, and the film growth rates at the range of modulation frequencies where particle generation are greatly reduced do not decrease appreciably. Compared to its counterpart pulse-wave modulation plasma, the sine-wave modulation plasma has demonstrated a better performance in terms of reduction of particle generation and film contamination, and of film growth rate. Thus, the sine-wave modulation plasma has shown as a promising method to be applied in the production of thin film with a high deposition rate and a low particle contamination.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena · Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Bertran E., Viera G., Martinez E., Esteve J., Maniette Y., Farjas J., Roura P. (2000). Thin Solid Film 377–378
2. Bouchoule A., Plain A., Boufendi L., Blondeau J. Ph., Laure C. (1991). J. Appl. Phys. 70: 1991–200010.1063/1.349484 ↗
3. Friedlander S.K. (1977) Smoke, dust and haze – fundamentals of aerosol behaviour. John Wiley & Sons, New York
4. Howling A.A., Hollenstein Ch., Paris P.-J. (1991). Appl. Phys. Lett. 59: 1409–141110.1063/1.105322 ↗
5. Jellum G.M., Daugherty J.E., Graves D.B. (1991). J. Appl. Phys. 69: 6923–692410.1063/1.347630 ↗
6. Kondo K., Imajo Y., Shimada M., Okuyama K. (2003). Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 29: 513–52010.1252/kakoronbunshu.29.513 ↗
7. Perrin J., Bohm C., Etemadi R., Lloret A. (1994). Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3: 252–26110.1088/0963-0252/3/3/003 ↗
8. Raupp G.B., Cale T.S. Hey H.P.W. (1992). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10: 3710.1116/1.586361 ↗
9. Selwyn G.S. (1991). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9: 3487–349210.1116/1.585829 ↗
10. Setyawan H., Shimada M., Imajo Y., Hayashi Y., Okuyama K. (2003). J. Aerosol Sci. 34: 923–93610.1016/S0021-8502(03)00066-1 ↗
11. Setyawan H., Shimada M., Hayashi Y., Okuyama K., Yokoyama S. (2004). Aerosol Sci. Tech. 38: 12010.1080/02786820490250845 ↗
12. Shiratani M., Maeda S., Koga K., Watanabe Y. (2000). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 39: 28710.1143/JJAP.39.287 ↗
13. Viera G., Andújar J.L., Sharma S.N., Bertran E. (1998). Surf. Coat. Tech. 100–101: 55–5810.1016/S0257-8972(97)00587-2 ↗
14. Watanabe Y., Shiratani M., Makino H. (1990). Appl. Phys. Lett. 57: 1616–161810.1063/1.104087 ↗